ANDRO-IVF: a novel protocol for poor responders to IVF controlled ovarian stimulation

被引:10
|
作者
Bercaire, Ludmila [1 ]
Nogueira, Sara M. B. [1 ]
Lima, Priscila C. M. [1 ]
Alves, Vanessa R. [1 ]
Donadio, Nilka [1 ]
Dzik, Artur [1 ]
Cavagna, Mario [1 ]
Fanchin, Renato [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Perola Byington, IVF Ctr, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Hosp Foch, IVF Ctr, Suresnes, France
来源
关键词
Fertilization in vitro; androgens; ovulation induction; oocyte retrieval; fertility agents; primary ovarian insufficiency;
D O I
10.5935/1518-0557.20180011
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to assess a novel protocol designed to improve poor ovarian response through intra-ovarian androgenization. The endpoints were: number of oocytes and mature oocytes retrieved, fertilization, cancellation and pregnancy rates. Methods: This prospective crossover study enrolled poor responders from previous ovarian stimulation cycles submitted to a novel protocol called ANDRO-IVF. The protocol included pretreatment with transdermal AndroGel(r) (Besins) 25 mg, oral letrozole 2.5 mg and subcutaneous hCG 2500 IU; cycle control was performed with estradiol valerate and micronized progesterone; ovarian stimulation was attained with gonadotropins FSH/LH 450 IU, GnRH antagonist and hCG 5000 IU. Results: Fourteen poor responders were enrolled. One patient did not meet the inclusion criteria. Thirteen patients previously summited to the standard protocol were offered the ANDRO-IVF Protocol.-Standard Protocol: Mean age: 35.30 years; cancellation rate: 61.53%; mean number of MII oocytes retrieved per patient: 1.8; fertilization rate: 33.33%. Only two patients had embryo transfers, and none got pregnant.-ANDRO-IVF Protocol: Mean age: 35.83 years; cancellation rate: 7.69%; mean number of oocytes retrieved per patient: 5.58, MII oocytes: 3.91. ICSI was performed in 84.61% of the patients and a mean of 1.5 embryos were transferred per patient. Fertilization rate: 62.5%; cumulative pregnancy rate: 16.66%; mean duration of stimulation: 9.77 days. Conclusion: ANDRO-IVF allows intra-ovarian androgenization by increasing serum and intra-follicular androgen levels and preventing androgen aromatization. This protocol apparently improved clinical outcomes of poor responders in parameters such as number of oocytes retrieved and clinical pregnancy rates. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 55
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effect of transdermal testosterone gel pretreatment on controlled ovarian stimulation and IVF outcome in low responders
    Kim, Chung-Hoon
    Howles, Colin M.
    Lee, Hyang-Ah
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (02) : 679 - 683
  • [42] Mild versus conventional ovarian stimulation for poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI: a prospective randomized study
    Siristatidis, C.
    Salamalekis, G.
    Dafopoulos, K.
    Basios, G.
    Vogiatzi, P.
    Papantoniou, N.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 : 438 - 439
  • [43] Mild versus conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF in poor responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Datta, Adrija Kumar
    Maheshwari, Abha
    Felix, Nirmal
    Campbell, Stuart
    Nargund, Geeta
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2020, 41 (02) : 225 - 238
  • [44] Is there an ideal stimulation regimen for IVF for poor responders and does it change with age?
    Vollenhoven, Beverley
    Osianlis, Tiki
    Catt, James
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2008, 25 (11-12) : 523 - 529
  • [45] Maximizing outcomes for poor responders to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in IVF: the use of microdose flare GnRH agonist induction to gonadotropin stimulation in women with previous IVF failure.
    Mark, AG
    Ginsburg, ES
    Jackson, KV
    Walsh, BW
    Racowsky, C
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2001, 76 (03) : S231 - S232
  • [46] Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation is a feasible method for poor ovarian responders undergoing in IVF/ICSI compared to a GnRH antagonist protocol: A retrospective study
    Huang, Pinxiu
    Tang, Minling
    Qin, Aiping
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2019, 48 (02) : 99 - 102
  • [47] Is there an ideal stimulation regimen for IVF for poor responders and does it change with age?
    Beverley Vollenhoven
    Tiki Osianlis
    James Catt
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2008, 25 : 523 - 529
  • [48] Efficiency of mild ovarian stimulation with clomiphene on poor ovarian responders during IVF\ICSI procedures: a meta-analysis
    Song, Dan
    Shi, Yichao
    Zhong, Yun
    Meng, Qingxia
    Hou, Shunyu
    Li, Hong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 204 : 36 - 43
  • [49] THE TELOMERE LENGTH OF LEUKOCYTES AND CUMULUS CELLS ARE NOT DIFFERENT BETWEEN POOR RESPONDERS AND GOOD RESPONDERS TO CONTROLLED OVARIAN HYPERSTIMULATION FOR IVF.
    Morin, S.
    Marin, D.
    Tao, X.
    Landis, J.
    Scott, R.
    Seli, E.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 110 (04) : E327 - E327
  • [50] Modified natural cycle IVF for poor ovarian responders: rethink before concluding
    Polyzos, N. P.
    Drakopoulos, P.
    Tournaye, H.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 (01) : 221 - 222