ANDRO-IVF: a novel protocol for poor responders to IVF controlled ovarian stimulation

被引:10
|
作者
Bercaire, Ludmila [1 ]
Nogueira, Sara M. B. [1 ]
Lima, Priscila C. M. [1 ]
Alves, Vanessa R. [1 ]
Donadio, Nilka [1 ]
Dzik, Artur [1 ]
Cavagna, Mario [1 ]
Fanchin, Renato [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Perola Byington, IVF Ctr, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Hosp Foch, IVF Ctr, Suresnes, France
来源
关键词
Fertilization in vitro; androgens; ovulation induction; oocyte retrieval; fertility agents; primary ovarian insufficiency;
D O I
10.5935/1518-0557.20180011
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to assess a novel protocol designed to improve poor ovarian response through intra-ovarian androgenization. The endpoints were: number of oocytes and mature oocytes retrieved, fertilization, cancellation and pregnancy rates. Methods: This prospective crossover study enrolled poor responders from previous ovarian stimulation cycles submitted to a novel protocol called ANDRO-IVF. The protocol included pretreatment with transdermal AndroGel(r) (Besins) 25 mg, oral letrozole 2.5 mg and subcutaneous hCG 2500 IU; cycle control was performed with estradiol valerate and micronized progesterone; ovarian stimulation was attained with gonadotropins FSH/LH 450 IU, GnRH antagonist and hCG 5000 IU. Results: Fourteen poor responders were enrolled. One patient did not meet the inclusion criteria. Thirteen patients previously summited to the standard protocol were offered the ANDRO-IVF Protocol.-Standard Protocol: Mean age: 35.30 years; cancellation rate: 61.53%; mean number of MII oocytes retrieved per patient: 1.8; fertilization rate: 33.33%. Only two patients had embryo transfers, and none got pregnant.-ANDRO-IVF Protocol: Mean age: 35.83 years; cancellation rate: 7.69%; mean number of oocytes retrieved per patient: 5.58, MII oocytes: 3.91. ICSI was performed in 84.61% of the patients and a mean of 1.5 embryos were transferred per patient. Fertilization rate: 62.5%; cumulative pregnancy rate: 16.66%; mean duration of stimulation: 9.77 days. Conclusion: ANDRO-IVF allows intra-ovarian androgenization by increasing serum and intra-follicular androgen levels and preventing androgen aromatization. This protocol apparently improved clinical outcomes of poor responders in parameters such as number of oocytes retrieved and clinical pregnancy rates. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 55
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Management of poor responders in IVF
    Lashen, H
    Ledger, W
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (07) : 1919 - 1919
  • [22] GH Deficiency Can be Encountered in Poor Ovarian Responders to IVF
    Jagot, Marie
    Sonnet, Emmanuel D.
    le Martelot, Marie-Therese
    Masse, Isabelle
    Crouzeix, Genevieve
    Leclercq, Estelle
    Kerlan, Veronique
    ENDOCRINE REVIEWS, 2014, 35 (03)
  • [23] Miscarriage risk for IVF pregnancies in poor responders to ovarian hyperstimulation
    Haadsma, Maaike L.
    Groen, Henk
    Mooij, Thea M.
    Burger, Curt W.
    Broekmans, Frank J. M.
    Lambalk, Cornelis B.
    van Leeuwen, Flora E.
    Hoek, Annemiek
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2010, 20 (02) : 191 - 200
  • [24] The 'Agonist-Antagonist Protocol' for poor responders undergoing IVF
    Berger, B. M.
    Baxter, B. R.
    Reindollar, R. H.
    Oskowitz, S. P.
    Alper, M. M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 : 50 - 51
  • [25] Comparisons of GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF
    Pu, Danhua
    Wu, Jie
    Liu, Jiayin
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 (10) : 2742 - 2749
  • [26] Live birth rates in "Bologna" poor responders treated with intensified ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI
    Polyzos, N. P.
    Nwoye, M.
    Corona, R.
    Blockeel, C.
    Stoop, D.
    Camus, M.
    Tournaye, H.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 : 232 - 232
  • [27] Optimal treatment for poor responders to ovarian stimulation: Does IVF offer any advantages to IUL
    Wood, SJ
    Sajjad, Y
    Rahim, R
    Searle, T
    Lewis-Jones, I
    Kingsland, CR
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 78 (03) : S7 - S7
  • [28] GnRH agonist stop antagonist protocol versus GnRH antagonist protocol in ovarian poor responders undergoing IVF
    Khezri, Atefeh
    Kashani, Ladan
    Moini, Ashraf
    Mojtahedi, Maryam Farid
    Yamini, Nazila
    Ataee, Mina
    REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE HIPERTENSION, 2022, 17 (01): : 46 - 52
  • [29] Direct ovarian stimulation by ovarian injection of rFSH and somatropin for the poor responders in IVF-ET program.
    Jung, J.
    Kwon, H. C.
    Kim, J. W.
    Kim, B. H.
    Lee, S. E.
    Lee, S. J.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 : S282 - S282
  • [30] A comparison of microdose flare protocol versus AACEP protocol for IVF poor responders
    Quintero, R.
    Yap, R.
    Lopez, M.
    Acacio, B.
    Nouriani, M.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 89 : S25 - S25