Classifying project management resources by complexity and leverage

被引:15
|
作者
Jugdev, Kam [1 ]
Mathur, Gita [2 ]
机构
[1] Athabasca Univ, Fac Business, Project Management & Strategy, Athabasca, AB, Canada
[2] San Jose State Univ, Coll Business, San Jose, CA 95192 USA
关键词
Project management; Resource management; Competitive advantage; Project management resources; Resource-based view; Strategic resources;
D O I
10.1108/17538371211192928
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present a conceptual framework to classify project management resources as sources of competitive advantage. Design/methodology/approach - The paper draws on the resource-based view of the firm and project management literature to explore the level of competitive advantage from 17 project management resources based on their degree of complexity and level of leverage in the project management process. This exploratory study drew on a small sample of practitioners in the classification. Findings - The paper proposes a conceptual model to show the relationship between four categories of resources and their contribution to competitive advantage by being valuable, rare, inimitable, and organizationally supported. Research limitations/implications - This paper is exploratory in nature and uses a small sample of practitioners. Practical implications - The authors believe that the classification of project management resources based on complexity and leverage provides a useful framework for managers considering the impact of investment in these resources for competitive advantage. Originality/value - This paper provides a classification of project management resources based on the complexity of the resource and its leverage in the project management process. It is posited that resources that are complex and can be highly leveraged to develop further resources warrant attention as sources of competitive advantage.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / +
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A theoretical framework for classifying project complexity at the preconstruction stage using cluster analysis techniques
    Sing, Michael C. P.
    Edwards, David J. J.
    Leung, Arthur W. T.
    Liu, Henry
    Roberts, Chris J. J.
    ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 29 (09) : 3754 - 3774
  • [32] Study on System Complexity Analysis and Complexity Integration Management of PPP Project
    You, Di
    NINTH CHINA PROJECT MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, 2010, : 228 - 231
  • [33] Exploring the Complexity of Projects: Implications of Complexity Theory for Project Management Practice
    Rose, Kenneth H.
    PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2009, 40 (03) : 84 - 84
  • [34] Project management estimating: Scope, timeline, resources
    LaGuardia, C
    Tallent, E
    LIBRARY JOURNAL, 1998, 123 (16) : 144 - 144
  • [35] Models for Sharing Resources in Agile Project Management
    Adam, Adrian
    Prostean, Gabriela
    SOFT COMPUTING APPLICATIONS, 2013, 195 : 691 - 697
  • [36] Project management using the buffers of time and resources
    Izmailov, Azar
    Korneva, Diana
    Kozhemiakin, Artem
    12TH INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, ISMC 2016, 2016, 235 : 189 - 197
  • [37] IT project management resources and capabilities: a Delphi study
    Hadaya, Pierre
    Cassivi, Luc
    Chalabi, Chahinaze
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2012, 5 (02) : 216 - 229
  • [38] Project management canvas: a systems thinking framework to address project complexity
    Elia, Gianluca
    Margherita, Alessandro
    Secundo, Giustina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2021, 14 (04) : 809 - 835
  • [39] IT-enabled management of project complexity - An Action Design Research project
    Mikkelsen, Mogens Frank
    Aaltonen, Kirsi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2023, 16 (01) : 141 - 164
  • [40] Does lean & agile project management help coping with project complexity?
    Sohi, Afshin Jalali
    Hertogh, Marcel
    Bosch-Rekveldt, Marian
    Blom, Rianne
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 29TH IPMA WORLD CONGRESS WC2015, 2016, 226 : 252 - 259