Classifying project management resources by complexity and leverage

被引:15
|
作者
Jugdev, Kam [1 ]
Mathur, Gita [2 ]
机构
[1] Athabasca Univ, Fac Business, Project Management & Strategy, Athabasca, AB, Canada
[2] San Jose State Univ, Coll Business, San Jose, CA 95192 USA
关键词
Project management; Resource management; Competitive advantage; Project management resources; Resource-based view; Strategic resources;
D O I
10.1108/17538371211192928
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present a conceptual framework to classify project management resources as sources of competitive advantage. Design/methodology/approach - The paper draws on the resource-based view of the firm and project management literature to explore the level of competitive advantage from 17 project management resources based on their degree of complexity and level of leverage in the project management process. This exploratory study drew on a small sample of practitioners in the classification. Findings - The paper proposes a conceptual model to show the relationship between four categories of resources and their contribution to competitive advantage by being valuable, rare, inimitable, and organizationally supported. Research limitations/implications - This paper is exploratory in nature and uses a small sample of practitioners. Practical implications - The authors believe that the classification of project management resources based on complexity and leverage provides a useful framework for managers considering the impact of investment in these resources for competitive advantage. Originality/value - This paper provides a classification of project management resources based on the complexity of the resource and its leverage in the project management process. It is posited that resources that are complex and can be highly leveraged to develop further resources warrant attention as sources of competitive advantage.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / +
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Classifying and Analysing Project Resources in Project Portfolio Optimizing Process
    Kral', P.
    Janoskova, K.
    TRANSPORT MEANS 2014, 2014, : 133 - 136
  • [2] Complexity in Project Management
    San Cristobal, J. R.
    CENTERIS 2017 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS / PROJMAN 2017 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT / HCIST 2017 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, CENTERI, 2017, 121 : 762 - 766
  • [3] Complexity of Project Scheduling Problem with Nonrenewable Resources
    Servakh, Vladimir V.
    Shcherbinina, Tatyana A.
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH PROCEEDINGS 2007, 2008, : 427 - +
  • [4] The Complexity in Project Management: An Approach to Social Complexity
    Teresa Herrera-Reyes, Ana
    de los Rios-Carmenado, Ignacio
    Guillen, Jesus
    ICEEM 2012: 2012 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC, EDUCATION AND MANAGEMENT, VOL 1, 2012, : 460 - +
  • [5] Risk Management with Leverage: Evidence from Project Finance
    Byoun, Soku
    Kim, Jaemin
    Yoo, Sean Sehyun
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2013, 48 (02) : 549 - 577
  • [6] Complexity management in project organisations
    Hansen, Zaza Nadja Lee
    Haug, Anders
    Afandi, Said
    Hvam, Lars
    PRODUCTION ENGINEERING-RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 15 (3-4): : 361 - 370
  • [7] Understanding project complexity: implications on project management
    Vidal, Ludovic-Alexandre
    Marle, Franck
    KYBERNETES, 2008, 37 (08) : 1094 - 1110
  • [8] Complexity Theory and Project Management
    Kodukula, Prasad
    PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 42 (05) : 92 - 92
  • [9] Complexity management in project organisations
    Zaza Nadja Lee Hansen
    Anders Haug
    Said Afandi
    Lars Hvam
    Production Engineering, 2021, 15 : 361 - 370
  • [10] CLASSIFYING PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES IN AN AUSTRALIAN CHENOPOD SHRUBLAND
    GIBBS, M
    LAMACRAFT, RR
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1984, 18 (03) : 215 - 227