Patient-controlled sedation with propofol/remifentanil versus propofol/alfentanil for patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy, a randomized, controlled double-blind study

被引:6
|
作者
Sultan, Sherif S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Alfentanil; colonoscopy; patient-controlled sedation; remifentanil;
D O I
10.4103/1658-354X.144068
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Context: Many techniques are used for sedation of colonoscopies. Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) is utilizing many drugs or drug combinations. Aims: The aim of this study is to compare the safety and feasibility of propofol/remifentanil versus propofol/alfentanil given to sedate patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopies through a patient-controlled technique. Settings and Design: Controlled randomized and double-blind study. Materials and Methods: A total of 80 patients were randomly divided into two groups; PA group received a combination of propofol/alfentanil and PR group received propofol/remifentanil combination. Patients were monitored for heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), oxygen saturation, and Ramsay sedation scale (RSS). Times of the following events were recorded; initiation of sedation, insertion and removal of the colonoscope, recovery and discharge. Five intervals were calculated; time to sedation, procedure time, postprocedure time, procedure room time, and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) time. Endoscopist and patient satisfaction scores were obtained. Statistical Analysis Used: Unpaired Student's t-test was used to compare between the two groups. Paired Student's t-test was used to compare baseline readings with readings after 30 min of sedation in the same group when needed. Results: Both groups showed slowing of the HR and decrease in mean arterial BP. HR and mean arterial BP were significantly lower 5 and 10 min after initiation of sedation in PR group when compared with PA group. Both HR and mean arterial BP returned to presedation readings 30 min after initiation of sedation in PR group but not in PA group. No differences between the two groups concerning oxygen saturation, RSS, endoscopist and patient satisfaction scores. Postprocedure and PACU times were significantly prolonged in PA group. Conclusion: PCS with either remifentanil/propofol or alfentanil/propofol for patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy is safe and feasible. Remifentanil/proofol has more beneficial advantages in this setting secondary to its more rapid clearance.
引用
收藏
页码:S36 / S40
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of propofol-nalbuphine and propofol-fentanyl sedation for patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial
    Wang, Peiqi
    Chen, Yan
    Guo, Ying
    Cao, Jiangbei
    Wang, Hong
    Mi, Weidong
    Xu, Longhe
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [32] Comparison of propofol-nalbuphine and propofol-fentanyl sedation for patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial
    Peiqi Wang
    Yan Chen
    Ying Guo
    Jiangbei Cao
    Hong Wang
    Weidong Mi
    Longhe Xu
    BMC Anesthesiology, 22
  • [33] Anesthesiologist-controlled versus patient-controlled propofol sedation for shockwave lithotripsy
    Alhashemi, JA
    Kaki, AM
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2006, 53 (05): : 449 - 455
  • [34] A prospective randomised controlled study of patient-controlled propofol sedation in phobic dental patients
    Girdler, NM
    Rynn, D
    Lyne, JP
    Wilson, KE
    ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 55 (04) : 327 - 333
  • [35] Remifentanil vs. Meperidine for Patient-Controlled Analgesia During Colonoscopy: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial
    Fanti, Lorella
    Massimo, Agostoni
    Marco, Gemma
    Giulia, Gambino
    Antonio, Facciorusso
    Mario, Guslandi
    Giorgio, Torri
    Alberto, Testoni Pier
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 104 (05): : 1119 - 1124
  • [36] Randomized controlled trial of patient-controlled sedation for colonoscopy: Entonox vs modified patient-maintained target-controlled propofol
    Maslekar, S.
    Balaji, P.
    Gardiner, A.
    Culbert, B.
    Monson, J. R. T.
    Duthie, G. S.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2011, 13 (01) : 48 - 57
  • [37] The efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol in patients undergoing painless hysteroscopy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Li, Aijun
    Li, Ning
    Zhu, Lei
    Xu, Zige
    Wang, Yifan
    Li, Junjie
    Zhang, Gerong
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [38] A Comparative Study Using Propofol Alone Versus Propofol Combined Midazolam for Colonoscopy: Randomized Double-Blind Study
    Park, Cheol Hee
    Kim, Jong Hyeok
    Jung, Jae One
    Moon, Joon Ho
    Shin, Woon Geon
    Kim, Jong Pyo
    Kim, Kyoung Oh
    Hahn, Taeho
    Yoo, Kyo-Sang
    Park, Sang Hoon
    Park, Choong Kee
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (05) : AB190 - AB190
  • [39] Propofol anesthesia for craniotomy: A double-blind comparison of remifentanil, alfentanil, and fentanyl
    Coles, JP
    Leary, TS
    Monteiro, JN
    Brazier, P
    Summors, A
    Doyle, P
    Matta, BF
    Gupta, AK
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 12 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [40] Patient-controlled sedation versus intravenous sedation for colonoscopy in elderly patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Lee, DWH
    Chan, ACW
    Sze, TS
    Ko, CW
    Poon, CM
    Chan, KC
    Sin, KS
    Chung, SCS
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (05) : 629 - 632