Patient-controlled sedation with propofol/remifentanil versus propofol/alfentanil for patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy, a randomized, controlled double-blind study

被引:6
|
作者
Sultan, Sherif S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Alfentanil; colonoscopy; patient-controlled sedation; remifentanil;
D O I
10.4103/1658-354X.144068
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Context: Many techniques are used for sedation of colonoscopies. Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) is utilizing many drugs or drug combinations. Aims: The aim of this study is to compare the safety and feasibility of propofol/remifentanil versus propofol/alfentanil given to sedate patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopies through a patient-controlled technique. Settings and Design: Controlled randomized and double-blind study. Materials and Methods: A total of 80 patients were randomly divided into two groups; PA group received a combination of propofol/alfentanil and PR group received propofol/remifentanil combination. Patients were monitored for heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), oxygen saturation, and Ramsay sedation scale (RSS). Times of the following events were recorded; initiation of sedation, insertion and removal of the colonoscope, recovery and discharge. Five intervals were calculated; time to sedation, procedure time, postprocedure time, procedure room time, and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) time. Endoscopist and patient satisfaction scores were obtained. Statistical Analysis Used: Unpaired Student's t-test was used to compare between the two groups. Paired Student's t-test was used to compare baseline readings with readings after 30 min of sedation in the same group when needed. Results: Both groups showed slowing of the HR and decrease in mean arterial BP. HR and mean arterial BP were significantly lower 5 and 10 min after initiation of sedation in PR group when compared with PA group. Both HR and mean arterial BP returned to presedation readings 30 min after initiation of sedation in PR group but not in PA group. No differences between the two groups concerning oxygen saturation, RSS, endoscopist and patient satisfaction scores. Postprocedure and PACU times were significantly prolonged in PA group. Conclusion: PCS with either remifentanil/propofol or alfentanil/propofol for patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy is safe and feasible. Remifentanil/proofol has more beneficial advantages in this setting secondary to its more rapid clearance.
引用
收藏
页码:S36 / S40
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Less respiratory depression with patient versus anesthesiologist controlled sedation: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy using propofol-remifentanil
    Mandel, Jeff
    Lichtenstein, Gary
    Metz, David
    Ginsberg, Gregory
    Kochman, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 : S518 - S518
  • [22] PATIENT SATISFACTION WITH PROPOFOL FOR OUTPATIENT COLONOSCOPY: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY.
    Padmanabhan, A.
    Frangopoulos, C.
    Shaffer, L.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2017, 60 (06) : E82 - E82
  • [23] Patient-controlled propofol infusion sedation
    Zych, Z
    ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 55 (09) : 933 - 933
  • [24] Propofol compared with bolus and titrated midazolam for sedation in outpatient colonoscopy: a prospective randomized double-blind study
    Kim, Dae Bum
    Kim, Joon Sung
    Huh, Cheal Wung
    Ma, Dae Won
    Ji, Jeong-Seon
    Kim, Byung-Wook
    Choi, Hwang
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (01) : 201 - 208
  • [25] Alfentanil and patient-controlled propofol sedation - facilitate gynaecological outpatient surgery with increased risk of respiratory events
    Nilsson, A.
    Nilsson, L.
    Ustaal, E.
    Sjoberg, F.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2012, 56 (09) : 1123 - 1129
  • [26] Patient-controlled sedation during transvaginal oocyte retrieval: an assessment of patient acceptance of patient-controlled sedation using a mixture of propofol and alfentanil
    Dell, RG
    Cloote, AH
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 15 (02) : 210 - 215
  • [27] Patient-controlled versus nurse-administered sedation with propofol during colonoscopy. A prospective randomized trial
    Heuss, LT
    Drewe, J
    Schnieper, P
    Tapparelli, CB
    Pflimlin, E
    Beglinger, C
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (03): : 511 - 518
  • [28] INTRAOPERATIVE PATIENT-CONTROLLED SEDATION - COMPARISON OF PATIENT-CONTROLLED PROPOFOL WITH PATIENT-CONTROLLED MIDAZOLAM
    RUDKIN, GE
    OSBORNE, GA
    FINN, BP
    JARVIS, DA
    VICKERS, D
    ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 47 (05) : 376 - 381
  • [29] Sedation for colonoscopy; A randomised, controlled trial comparing patient-controlled administration of propofol and alfentanil with physician-administered midazolam and pethidine
    Roseveare, C
    Bright, L
    Dalgleish, D
    Kimble, J
    Shepherd, H
    GUT, 2002, 50 : A40 - A40
  • [30] Nurse-administered propofol-alfentanil sedation using a patient-controlled analgesia pump compared with opioid-benzodiazepine sedation for outpatient colonoscopy
    Liu, S. Y. W.
    Poon, C. M.
    Leung, T. L.
    Wong, C. W.
    Chan, Y. L.
    Leung, T. C.
    Leong, H. T.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 41 (06) : 522 - 528