Patient-controlled sedation with propofol/remifentanil versus propofol/alfentanil for patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy, a randomized, controlled double-blind study

被引:6
|
作者
Sultan, Sherif S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Alfentanil; colonoscopy; patient-controlled sedation; remifentanil;
D O I
10.4103/1658-354X.144068
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Context: Many techniques are used for sedation of colonoscopies. Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) is utilizing many drugs or drug combinations. Aims: The aim of this study is to compare the safety and feasibility of propofol/remifentanil versus propofol/alfentanil given to sedate patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopies through a patient-controlled technique. Settings and Design: Controlled randomized and double-blind study. Materials and Methods: A total of 80 patients were randomly divided into two groups; PA group received a combination of propofol/alfentanil and PR group received propofol/remifentanil combination. Patients were monitored for heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), oxygen saturation, and Ramsay sedation scale (RSS). Times of the following events were recorded; initiation of sedation, insertion and removal of the colonoscope, recovery and discharge. Five intervals were calculated; time to sedation, procedure time, postprocedure time, procedure room time, and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) time. Endoscopist and patient satisfaction scores were obtained. Statistical Analysis Used: Unpaired Student's t-test was used to compare between the two groups. Paired Student's t-test was used to compare baseline readings with readings after 30 min of sedation in the same group when needed. Results: Both groups showed slowing of the HR and decrease in mean arterial BP. HR and mean arterial BP were significantly lower 5 and 10 min after initiation of sedation in PR group when compared with PA group. Both HR and mean arterial BP returned to presedation readings 30 min after initiation of sedation in PR group but not in PA group. No differences between the two groups concerning oxygen saturation, RSS, endoscopist and patient satisfaction scores. Postprocedure and PACU times were significantly prolonged in PA group. Conclusion: PCS with either remifentanil/propofol or alfentanil/propofol for patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy is safe and feasible. Remifentanil/proofol has more beneficial advantages in this setting secondary to its more rapid clearance.
引用
收藏
页码:S36 / S40
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of patient-controlled sedation with propofol/remifentanil versus midazolam/fentanyl for colonoscopy
    Mandel, Jeff E.
    Tanner, Jonathan W.
    Lichtenstein, Gary R.
    Metz, David C.
    Katzka, David A.
    Ginsberg, Gregory G.
    Kochman, Michael L.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 106 (02): : 434 - 439
  • [2] A randomized controlled double blind trial of patient-controlled sedation for colonoscopy with propofol/remifentanil vs. midazolam/fentanyl
    Mandel, Jeff E.
    Tanner, Jonathan
    Lichtenstein, Gary R.
    Metz, David C.
    Katzka, David A.
    Ginsberg, Gregory
    Kochman, Michael L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (09): : S520 - S521
  • [3] Patient-controlled sedation with propofol for ERCP: Remifentanil vs alfentanil
    Mazanikov, M.
    Udd, M.
    Lindstrom, O.
    Farkila, M.
    Poyhia, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (01) : 38 - 39
  • [4] Patient-controlled sedation for ERCP: a randomized double-blind comparison of alfentanil and remifentanil
    Mazanikov, M.
    Udd, M.
    Kylanpaa, L.
    Mustonen, H.
    Lindstrom, O.
    Halttunen, J.
    Farkkila, M.
    Poyhia, R.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 44 (05) : 487 - 492
  • [5] Patient-controlled sedation with propofol and remifentanil for ERCP: a randomized, controlled study
    Mazanikov, Maxim
    Udd, Marianne
    Kylanpaa, Leena
    Lindstrom, Outi
    Aho, Pekka
    Halttunen, Jorma
    Farkkila, Martti
    Poyhia, Reino
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 73 (02) : 260 - 266
  • [6] A randomized trial comparing patient-controlled sedation using propofol/alfentanil to diazemul/pethidine in patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy.
    Liu, GM
    Ching, JY
    Chan, SK
    Lau, JY
    Sun, LC
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 51 (04) : AB62 - AB62
  • [7] Patient-controlled sedation with propofol and alfentanil during colonoscopy: A pilot study
    Roseveare, C
    Seavell, C
    Patel, P
    Criswell, J
    Shepherd, H
    ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 30 (05) : 482 - 483
  • [8] Safer colonoscopy with patient-controlled analgesia and sedation with propofol and alfentanil
    Külling, D
    Fantin, AC
    Biro, P
    Bauerfeind, P
    Fried, M
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 54 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [9] Patient-controlled sedation using propofol: randomized, double-blind dose refinement
    Smith, AF
    Thorpe, SJ
    Cook, LB
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 16 (01) : 18 - 22
  • [10] Patient-controlled sedation with propofol for colonoscopy
    Ng, JM
    Kong, CF
    Nyam, D
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 54 (01) : 8 - 13