Survey on animal welfare in nine hundred and forty three Italian dairy farms

被引:9
|
作者
Peli, Angelo [1 ]
Pietra, Marco [1 ]
Giacometti, Federica [1 ]
Mazzi, Antonella [2 ]
Scacco, Gianluca [1 ]
Serraino, Andrea [1 ]
Scagliarini, Lorenzo [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum, Dept Vet Sci, Via Tolara Supra 50, I-4001)4 Ozzano Dell Emilia, BO, Italy
[2] Vet Practitioner, Modena, Italy
[3] Vet Publ Hlth Area, Bologna, Italy
[4] Local Hlth Unit Bologna, Bologna, Italy
来源
ITALIAN JOURNAL OF FOOD SAFETY | 2016年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
Dairy cows; Survey; Italy;
D O I
10.4081/ijfs.2016.5832
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The final results of a survey on welfare of dairy cows in 7 Italian Regions are presented. The study has been performed on 943 farms in southern and central Italy to highlight critical and strong points concerning animal welfare in dairy systems, by using direct and indirect criteria. To assess animal welfare, a checklist based on 303 parameters has been used; indirect criteria have been organised in 5 general areas concerning Farm management. Farming and housing systems, Environment, Feeding, Health and hygiene: other resource-based criteria were considered in 5 specific areas for the different productive categories (lactating cows, dry cows, pregnant heifers, cows comeback, calves up to 8 weeks and calves between 8 weeks and 6 months); finally, an Indicators section focused on animal based criteria. Parameters have been valued as conforming or not conforming on the basis of the current lesgislation on animal welfare, and in the other cases by the use of a semi-quantitative scale such as poor, satisfactory., good or very good referring to scientific literature and reports by the Animal Health and Animal Welfare panel of the European Food Safety Authority Among the 249 examined parameters (54 criteria have been valued as descriptive), 15 showed a failure prevalence inferior to 1%; for the remaining parameters, the overall non-compliance prevalence on the whole sample ranged from a maximum of 67% to a minimum of 2%, showing an inverse proportionality correlation with the herd size. One hundred and ten parameters were judged as poor (96) or not in compliance with the rules in force (14) in more than 10% of the examined herds. The most common non-compliance aspects detected in the different areas concern calves management, staff training and prophylaxis programmes; staff training levels were inversely related to failure prevalences in almost all areas. The combination of direct and indirect criteria has allowed to fully embrace recommendations on the use of animal based measures for the assessment of animal welfare, as accepted into the strategic Plan for the EU animal welfare for 2012-2015.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 56
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A survey of some factors relevant to animal welfare on 249 dairy farms in the Republic of Ireland Part 2: Data on incidence of disease, culling and biosecurity measures
    Leonard, N
    Egan, J
    Griffin, J
    Hanlon, A
    Poole, D
    IRISH VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2001, 54 (09) : 454 - 456
  • [42] Comparison of selected animal observations and management practices used to assess welfare of calves and adult dairy cows on organic and conventional dairy farms
    Bergman, M. A.
    Richert, R. M.
    Cicconi-Hogan, K. M.
    Gamroth, M. J.
    Schukken, Y. H.
    Stiglbauer, K. E.
    Ruegg, P. L.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2014, 97 (07) : 4269 - 4280
  • [43] Comparative Analysis of Animal Welfare in Three Broiler Slaughterhouses and Associated Farms with Unsatisfactory Slaughterhouse Results
    Saraiva, Sonia
    Santos, Sara
    Garcia-Diez, Juan
    Simoes, Joao
    Saraiva, Cristina
    ANIMALS, 2024, 14 (17):
  • [44] SURVEY OF NINE ABORTIFACIENT INFECTIOUS AGENTS IN ABORTED BOVINE FETUSES FROM DAIRY FARMS IN BEIJING, CHINA, BY PCR
    Yang, Na
    Cui, Xia
    Qian, Weifeng
    Yu, Shanshan
    Liu, Qun
    ACTA VETERINARIA HUNGARICA, 2012, 60 (01) : 83 - 92
  • [45] A comparison of three animal welfare assessment protocols applied to Swedish dairy cow herds
    Larsson, B. Staaf
    Jansson, A.
    Holmberg, M.
    von Walter, L. Winblad
    Steen, M.
    Dahlborn, K.
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 73 (3-4): : 153 - 164
  • [46] Impact of animal health and welfare planning on medicine use, herd health and production in European organic dairy farms
    Ivemeyer, S.
    Smolders, G.
    Brinkmann, J.
    Gratzer, E.
    Hansen, B.
    Henriksen, B. I. F.
    Huber, J.
    Leeb, C.
    March, S.
    Mejdell, C.
    Nicholas, P.
    Roderick, S.
    Stoeger, E.
    Vaarst, M.
    Whistance, L. K.
    Winckler, C.
    Walkenhorst, M.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2012, 145 (1-3) : 63 - 72
  • [47] Characterization of Phosphorus in Animal Manures Collected from Three (Dairy, Swine, and Broiler) Farms in China
    Li, Guohua
    Li, Haigang
    Leffelaar, Peter A.
    Shen, Jianbo
    Zhang, Fusuo
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (07):
  • [48] Survey on housing, management and welfare of dairy cattle in tie-stalls in western Italian Alps
    Mattiello, S
    Arduino, D
    Tosi, MV
    Carenzi, C
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2005, 55 (01): : 31 - 39
  • [49] Assessing circumstances and causes of dairy cow death in Italian dairy farms through a veterinary practice survey (2013-2014)
    Fusi, Francesca
    Angelucci, Alessandra
    Lorenzi, Valentina
    Bolzoni, Luca
    Bertocchi, Luigi
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2017, 137 : 105 - 108
  • [50] A survey of Australian dairy farmers to investigate animal welfare risks associated with increasing scale of production
    Beggs, D. S.
    Fisher, A. D.
    Jongman, E. C.
    Hemsworth, P. H.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2015, 98 (08) : 5330 - 5338