Survey on animal welfare in nine hundred and forty three Italian dairy farms

被引:9
|
作者
Peli, Angelo [1 ]
Pietra, Marco [1 ]
Giacometti, Federica [1 ]
Mazzi, Antonella [2 ]
Scacco, Gianluca [1 ]
Serraino, Andrea [1 ]
Scagliarini, Lorenzo [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum, Dept Vet Sci, Via Tolara Supra 50, I-4001)4 Ozzano Dell Emilia, BO, Italy
[2] Vet Practitioner, Modena, Italy
[3] Vet Publ Hlth Area, Bologna, Italy
[4] Local Hlth Unit Bologna, Bologna, Italy
来源
ITALIAN JOURNAL OF FOOD SAFETY | 2016年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
Dairy cows; Survey; Italy;
D O I
10.4081/ijfs.2016.5832
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The final results of a survey on welfare of dairy cows in 7 Italian Regions are presented. The study has been performed on 943 farms in southern and central Italy to highlight critical and strong points concerning animal welfare in dairy systems, by using direct and indirect criteria. To assess animal welfare, a checklist based on 303 parameters has been used; indirect criteria have been organised in 5 general areas concerning Farm management. Farming and housing systems, Environment, Feeding, Health and hygiene: other resource-based criteria were considered in 5 specific areas for the different productive categories (lactating cows, dry cows, pregnant heifers, cows comeback, calves up to 8 weeks and calves between 8 weeks and 6 months); finally, an Indicators section focused on animal based criteria. Parameters have been valued as conforming or not conforming on the basis of the current lesgislation on animal welfare, and in the other cases by the use of a semi-quantitative scale such as poor, satisfactory., good or very good referring to scientific literature and reports by the Animal Health and Animal Welfare panel of the European Food Safety Authority Among the 249 examined parameters (54 criteria have been valued as descriptive), 15 showed a failure prevalence inferior to 1%; for the remaining parameters, the overall non-compliance prevalence on the whole sample ranged from a maximum of 67% to a minimum of 2%, showing an inverse proportionality correlation with the herd size. One hundred and ten parameters were judged as poor (96) or not in compliance with the rules in force (14) in more than 10% of the examined herds. The most common non-compliance aspects detected in the different areas concern calves management, staff training and prophylaxis programmes; staff training levels were inversely related to failure prevalences in almost all areas. The combination of direct and indirect criteria has allowed to fully embrace recommendations on the use of animal based measures for the assessment of animal welfare, as accepted into the strategic Plan for the EU animal welfare for 2012-2015.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 56
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A survey of some factors relevant to animal welfare on 249 dairy farms in the Republic of Ireland - Part 1: Data on housing, calving and calf husbandry
    Egan, J
    Leonard, N
    Griffin, J
    Hanlon, A
    Poole, D
    IRISH VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2001, 54 (08) : 388 - 392
  • [32] Classification of animal welfare on mink farms differs between three annual production periods
    Henriksen, B. I. F.
    Sorensen, J. T.
    Moller, S. H.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2016, 25 (02) : 265 - 273
  • [33] A survey of management practices that influence production and welfare of dairy cattle on family farms in southern Brazil
    Costa, J. H. C.
    Hoetzel, M. J.
    Longo, C.
    Balcao, L. F.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2013, 96 (01) : 307 - 317
  • [34] Relationship between herd size and measures of animal welfare on dairy cattle farms with freestall housing in Germany
    Gieseke, Daniel
    Lambertz, Christian
    Gauly, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2018, 101 (08) : 7397 - 7411
  • [35] Animal welfare outcomes and associated risk indicators on Austrian dairy farms: A cross-sectional study
    Schenkenfelder, J.
    Winckler, C.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2021, 104 (10) : 11091 - 11107
  • [36] Current state of animal welfare in Puerto Rico's dairy farms according to FARM observational evaluations
    Ruiz-Ramos, M.
    Perdomo-Garcia, C. R.
    Rivera-Camacho, C. I.
    Ortiz-Colon, G.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2022, 105 : 76 - 76
  • [37] Animal Welfare and Mountain Products from Traditional Dairy Farms: How Do Consumers Perceive Complexity?
    Zuliani, Anna
    Esbjerg, Lars
    Grunert, Klaus G.
    Bovolenta, Stefano
    ANIMALS, 2018, 8 (11):
  • [38] How Do Animal Welfare Practices Relate to Farm Characteristics? Evidence from German Dairy Farms
    Wimmer, Stefan
    Frick, Fabian
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2022, 47 (02) : 427 - +
  • [39] Animal Welfare and Parasite Infections in Organic and Conventional Dairy Farms: A Comparative Pilot Study in Central Italy
    Chincarini, Matteo
    Lanzoni, Lydia
    Di Pasquale, Jorgelina
    Morelli, Simone
    Vignola, Giorgio
    Paoletti, Barbara
    Di Cesare, Angela
    ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [40] On-farm welfare assessment of dairy goat farms using animal-based indicators: the example of 30 commercial farms in Portugal
    Can, E.
    Vieira, A.
    Battini, M.
    Mattiello, S.
    Stilwell, G.
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 66 (01): : 43 - 55