THE PREDICTIVE PROBABILITY OF TWO DIFFERENT BREAST CANCER NOMOGRAMS FOR NON SENTINEL AXILLARY LYMPH NODE METASTASIS IN POSITIVE SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY

被引:0
|
作者
Guer, Akif Serhat [1 ]
Uenal, Buelent [1 ]
Johnson, Ronald [1 ]
Ahrendt, Gretchen [1 ]
Bonaventura, Marguerite [1 ]
Evrensel, Turkkan [2 ]
Soran, Atilla [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hosp, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Uludag Univ, Tip Fak, Med Onkol, Bursa, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH | 2008年 / 4卷 / 03期
关键词
breast cancer; sentinel lymph node; nomogram;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Non sentinel axillary lymph node metastasis (NSLNM) occurs in 35-50% of breast cancer (BC) patients having positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN). A nomogram which includes 8 variables was developed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) in 2003 and it has been validated at sources outside that institution. The Stanford University group recently reported their nomogram which evaluated 3 variables. AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the predictability of two different scoring systems wherein 3 or 8 variables are used in the same patient groups. MATERIALS and METHODS: We identified 201 patients who had a positive SLN biopsy and completion axillary lymph node dissection at Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC over a 5 year period. The computerized BC nomograms developed by MSKCC and Stanford University were used to calculate the probability of non-sentinel lymph node metastases. Area Under (AUC) Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (ROC) was calculated for each nomogram and the values more than 0.70 have been accepted that presents considerable discrimination. RESULTS: Sixty-six of 201 patients (32.8%) had positive axillary NSLNM. The mean predicted probability of positive NSLNM was 25.4% (3-93), and 66.3% (7-100) for the MSKCC and Stanford nomograms, respectively. The AUC values were 0.73 and 0.67 for MSKCC and Stanford nomograms, respectively. DISCUSSION and CONCLUSION: Nomograms for predicting the probability of NSLNM in BC patients have been in use for 5 years. It is clear there are discrepancies in the results of nomograms among the studies using the same scoring system. Notwithstanding the Stanford nomogram is easier to implement as it considers only 3 variables in our study, we found the MSKCC nomogram to be more predictive than the Stanford nomogram Nomograms developed at outside institutions should be used with caution when counseling patients regarding the risk of additional nodal disease.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 173
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of criteria for the indication of axillary lymph node dissection in patients with breast cancer and positive sentinel lymph node biopsy
    Vega Perez, D.
    Tabuenca Mateo, M.
    Martin Ferrer, M.
    Martinez Albero, E.
    Godigna Guilloteau, V.
    Galiana Moron, A.
    Ruiz Solis, S.
    Estenoz Alfaro, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2019, 46 (SUPPL 1) : S335 - S335
  • [42] Sentinel lymph node micrometastasis and predictive factors for metastasis in non-sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer
    Troilo, V. L.
    D'Eredita, G.
    Fischetti, F.
    Indellicato, R.
    Berardi, T.
    GIORNALE DI CHIRURGIA, 2009, 30 (05): : 1 - 5
  • [43] Sentinel lymph node biopsy alone without axillary lymph node dissection - follow up of sentinel lymph node negative breast cancer patients
    Reitsamer, R
    Peintinger, F
    Prokop, E
    Menzel, C
    Cimpoca, W
    Rettenbacher, L
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 29 (03): : 221 - 223
  • [44] Sentinel lymph node biopsy alone without axillary lymph node dissection - Follow up of sentinel lymph node negative breast cancer patients
    Reitsamer, R
    Peintinger, F
    Prokop, E
    Rettenbacher, L
    Menzel, C
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 10 (01) : S60 - S60
  • [45] Validation of breast cancer nomograms for predicting the non-sentinel lymph node metastases after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in a multi-center study
    Gur, A. S.
    Unal, B.
    Ozbek, U.
    Ozmen, V.
    Aydogan, F.
    Gokgoz, S.
    Gulluoglu, B. M.
    Aksaz, E.
    Ozbas, S.
    Baskan, S.
    Koyuncu, A.
    Soran, A.
    EJSO, 2010, 36 (01): : 30 - 35
  • [46] Increased sentinel lymph node lymphangiogenesis is associated with nonsentinel axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node
    Van den Eynden, Gert G.
    Vandenberghe, Melanie K.
    van Dam, Pieter-Jan H.
    Colpaert, Cecile G.
    van Dam, Peter
    Dirix, Luc Y.
    Vermeulen, Peter B.
    Van Marck, Eric A.
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (18) : 5391 - 5397
  • [47] Axillary Clearance Following Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Symptomatic Breast Cancer
    Shaker, Hudhaifah
    Mahate, Zeinab
    Dabritz, Grit
    Absar, Mohammed S.
    IN VIVO, 2020, 34 (06): : 3503 - 3509
  • [48] A New and Simple Predictive Formula for Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes, and Validation of 3 Different Nomograms in Turkish Breast Cancer Patients
    Yeniay, Levent
    Carti, Erdem
    Karaca, Can
    Zekioglu, Osman
    Yararbas, Ulkem
    Yilmaz, Rasih
    Kapkac, Murat
    BREAST CARE, 2012, 7 (05) : 397 - 402
  • [49] Validation of a nomogram to predict the risk of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy
    van la Parra, R.
    Ernst, M. F.
    Barneveld, P. C.
    Broekman, J.
    Bosscha, K.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 5 (04): : 226 - 226
  • [50] Factors Predicting the Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients With Sentinel Lymph Node
    Uras, Cihan
    Boler, Deniz E.
    Ince, Umit
    Cabioglu, Neslihan
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 : S183 - S183