THE PREDICTIVE PROBABILITY OF TWO DIFFERENT BREAST CANCER NOMOGRAMS FOR NON SENTINEL AXILLARY LYMPH NODE METASTASIS IN POSITIVE SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY

被引:0
|
作者
Guer, Akif Serhat [1 ]
Uenal, Buelent [1 ]
Johnson, Ronald [1 ]
Ahrendt, Gretchen [1 ]
Bonaventura, Marguerite [1 ]
Evrensel, Turkkan [2 ]
Soran, Atilla [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hosp, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Uludag Univ, Tip Fak, Med Onkol, Bursa, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH | 2008年 / 4卷 / 03期
关键词
breast cancer; sentinel lymph node; nomogram;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Non sentinel axillary lymph node metastasis (NSLNM) occurs in 35-50% of breast cancer (BC) patients having positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN). A nomogram which includes 8 variables was developed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) in 2003 and it has been validated at sources outside that institution. The Stanford University group recently reported their nomogram which evaluated 3 variables. AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the predictability of two different scoring systems wherein 3 or 8 variables are used in the same patient groups. MATERIALS and METHODS: We identified 201 patients who had a positive SLN biopsy and completion axillary lymph node dissection at Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC over a 5 year period. The computerized BC nomograms developed by MSKCC and Stanford University were used to calculate the probability of non-sentinel lymph node metastases. Area Under (AUC) Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (ROC) was calculated for each nomogram and the values more than 0.70 have been accepted that presents considerable discrimination. RESULTS: Sixty-six of 201 patients (32.8%) had positive axillary NSLNM. The mean predicted probability of positive NSLNM was 25.4% (3-93), and 66.3% (7-100) for the MSKCC and Stanford nomograms, respectively. The AUC values were 0.73 and 0.67 for MSKCC and Stanford nomograms, respectively. DISCUSSION and CONCLUSION: Nomograms for predicting the probability of NSLNM in BC patients have been in use for 5 years. It is clear there are discrepancies in the results of nomograms among the studies using the same scoring system. Notwithstanding the Stanford nomogram is easier to implement as it considers only 3 variables in our study, we found the MSKCC nomogram to be more predictive than the Stanford nomogram Nomograms developed at outside institutions should be used with caution when counseling patients regarding the risk of additional nodal disease.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 173
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Accuracy of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Compared with Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer
    Tahmasebi, Sedigheh
    Azimi, Ali
    Talei, Abdolrasoul
    Zakeri, Zeinab
    MIDDLE EAST JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 2 (3-4) : 99 - 103
  • [32] Validation of nomograms to predict non-sentinel lymph node metastasis after positive sentinel lymph node in breast cancer: Indian cohort background.
    Reddy, Asha
    Nair, Nita S.
    Mokal, Smruti
    Shet, Tanuja
    Parmar, Vani
    Joshi, Shalaka P.
    Chitkara, Garvit
    Thakkar, Purvi
    Badwe, Rajendra
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)
  • [33] Association between non-sentinel lymph node metastasis and clinicopathological factors in sentinel lymph node metastasis positive breast cancer
    Koyama, Yu
    Hasegawa, Miki
    Tatsuda, Kumiko
    Sakata, Jun
    Kobayashi, Takashi
    Minagawa, Masahiro
    Kosugi, Shin-Ichi
    Wakai, Toshifumi
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2014, 219 (04) : E172 - E173
  • [34] Can Nomograms Predict Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Sentinel Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients?
    Unal, Bulent
    Gur, Akif Serhat
    Ahrendt, Gretchen
    Johnson, Ronald
    Bonaventura, Marguerite
    Soran, Atilla
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2009, 9 (02) : 92 - 95
  • [35] Sentinel node biopsy to avoid axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer
    Motomura K.
    Komoike Y.
    Nagumo S.
    Kasugai T.
    Hasegawa Y.
    Inaji H.
    Noguchi S.
    Koyama H.
    Breast Cancer, 2002, 9 (4) : 337 - 343
  • [36] Diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in determining the axillary lymph node metastasis
    Okur, Ozlem
    Sagiroglu, Julide
    Kir, Gozde
    Bulut, Nurgul
    Alimoglu, Orhan
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 16 (06) : 1265 - 1268
  • [37] Comparison of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Alone and Completion Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Node-Positive Breast Cancer
    Bilimoria, Karl Y.
    Bentrem, David J.
    Hansen, Nora M.
    Bethke, Kevin P.
    Rademaker, Alfred W.
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    Winchester, David P.
    Winchester, David J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (18) : 2946 - 2953
  • [38] Non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node: validation of five nomograms and development of a new predictive model
    Lombardi, Augusto
    Maggi, Stefano
    Lo Russo, Marzia
    Scopinaro, Francesco
    Di Stefano, Domenica
    Pittau, Maria Grazia
    Tiberi, Simone
    Amanti, Claudio
    TUMORI, 2011, 97 (06) : 749 - 755
  • [39] Validation of Three Different Nomograms to Predict the Risk of Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Involvement in Turkish Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis
    Yeniay, L.
    Karaca, A. C.
    Carti, E.
    Ozdemir, N.
    Yararbas, U.
    Zekioglu, O.
    Yilmaz, R.
    Kapkac, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 : S208 - S208
  • [40] Predictors of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph node (Pilot study)
    Eldweny, Hany
    Alkhaldy, Khaled
    Alsaleh, Noha
    Abdulsamad, Majda
    Abbas, Ahmed
    Hamad, Ahmad
    Mounib, Sherif
    Essam, Tarek
    Kukawski, Pawel
    Bobin, Jean-Yves
    Oteifa, Medhat
    Amanguono, Henney
    Abulhoda, Fawaz
    Usmani, Sharjeel
    Elbasmy, Amany
    JOURNAL OF THE EGYPTIAN NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2012, 24 (01) : 23 - 30