COMPARISON OF ETOMIDATE, KETAMINE, MIDAZOLAM, PROPOFOL, AND THIOPENTAL ON FUNCTION AND METABOLISM OF ISOLATED HEARTS

被引:0
|
作者
STOWE, DF
BOSNJAK, ZJ
KAMPINE, JP
机构
[1] MED COLL WISCONSIN,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,ANESTHESIOL RES LAB,MILWAUKEE,WI 53226
[2] MED COLL WISCONSIN,DEPT PHYSIOL,MILWAUKEE,WI 53226
[3] VET AFFAIRS MED CTR,MILWAUKEE,WI
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 1992年 / 74卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The authors examined direct myocardial and coronary vascular responses to the anesthetic induction agents etomidate, ketamine, midazolam, propofol, and thiopental and compared their effects on attenuating autoregulation of coronary flow as assessed by changes in oxygen supply/demand relationships. Spontaneous heart rate, atrioventricular conduction time during atrial pacing, left ventricular pressure (LVP), coronary flow (CF), percent oxygen extraction, oxygen delivery, and myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) were examined in 55 isolated guinea pig hearts divided into five groups of 11 each. Hearts were perfused at constant pressure with one of the drugs administered at steady-state concentrations increasing from 0.5-mu-M to 1 mM. Adenosine was given to test maximal CF. At concentrations below 10-mu-M no significant changes were observed; beyond 50-mu-M for midazolam, etomidate, and propofol, and 100-mu-M for thiopental and ketamine, each agent caused progressive but differential decreases in heart rate, atrioventricular conduction time (leading to atrioventricular dissociation), LVP, +dLVP/dt(max), percent oxygen extraction, and MVO2. The concentrations (mu-M) at which +dLVP/dt(max) was reduced by 50% were as follows: etomidate, 82 +/- 2 (mean +/- SEM); propofol, 91 +/- 4; midazolam, 105 +/- 8; thiopental, 156 +/- 11; and ketamine, 323 +/- 7; the rank order of potency was etomidate = propofol = midazolam > thiopental > ketamine; results were similar for LVP. At the 100-mu-M concentration, CF was decreased 11% +/- 2% by ketamine and 5% +/- 3% by thiopental but was increased 17% +/- 6% by etomidate, 21% +/- 5% by midazolam, and near maximally to 57% +/- 10% by propofol; MVO2 was decreased 8% +/- 4% by thiopental, 10% +/- 5% by ketamine, 19% +/- 5% by midazolam, 29% +/- 7% by etomidate, and 37% +/- 5% by propofol; oxygen delivery/MVO2 was unchanged by thiopental and ketamine but was increased 62% +/- 7% by midazolam, 71% +/- 9% by etomidate, and 150% +/- 15% by propofol. Between 100-mu-M and 1 mM, thiopental and ketamine did not increase CF but decreased MVO2 and percent oxygen extraction, whereas propofol maximally increased CF and decreased MVO2 and midazolam and etomidate had intermediate effects. These results indicate that on a molar basis, propofol, and less so midazolam and etomidate, depress cardiac function moderately more than thiopental and ketamine, and that propofol markedly attenuates autoregulation by causing coronary vasodilation. With doses used to induce anesthesia, propofol and thiopental appear to depress cardiac function more than ketamine or etomidate.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 558
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Comparative Study of the effect of anesthesia induction with the use of four drug combinations including "propofol," "etomidate-propofol," "thiopental," and "midazolam-thiopental" on hemodynamic changes during the insertion of laryngeal mask in eye surgery
    Shetabi, Hamidreza
    Montazeri, Kamran
    Ghoodjani, Yalda
    ADVANCED BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (01): : 11
  • [42] A COMPARISON OF HEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF ETOMIDATE-MIDAZOLAM AND KETAMINE-MIDAZOLAM FOR ANESTHESIA INDUCTION IN CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING SURGERY
    Pirat, A.
    Komurcu, O.
    Camkiran, A.
    Arslan, G.
    Bayraktar, N.
    Sezgin, A.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 39 : S414 - S414
  • [43] Comparison of Propofol and Propofol/Ketamine Anesthesia for Evaluation of Laryngeal Function in Healthy Dogs
    McKeirnan, Kelci L.
    Gross, Marjorie E.
    Rochat, Mark
    Payton, Mark
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ANIMAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 50 (01) : 19 - 26
  • [44] INFLUENCE OF THIOPENTAL, ETOMIDATE, AND PROPOFOL ON REGIONAL MYOCARDIAL-FUNCTION IN THE NORMAL AND ACUTE ISCHEMIC HEART SEGMENT IN DOGS
    DEHERT, SG
    VERMEYEN, KM
    ADRIAENSEN, HF
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1990, 70 (06): : 600 - 607
  • [45] The comparison of the effects of anesthetic doses of ketamine, propofol, and etomidate on ischemia-reperfusion injury in skeletal muscle
    Ergun, Yusuf
    Darendeli, Sacide
    Imrek, Secil
    Kilinc, Metin
    Oksuz, Hafize
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 24 (02) : 215 - 222
  • [46] Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Skeletal Muscle: Comparison of the Effects of Subanesthetic Doses of Ketamine, Propofol, and Etomidate
    Ergun, Yusuf
    Oksuz, Hafize
    Atli, Yalcin
    Kilinc, Metin
    Darendeli, Sacide
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 159 (01) : E1 - E10
  • [47] MYOCARDIAL-METABOLISM AFTER ADMINISTRATION OF PROPOFOL IN GERIATRIC-PATIENTS - A COMPARISON WITH ETOMIDATE
    LARSEN, R
    LANGE, H
    RATHGEBER, J
    ANAESTHESIST, 1988, 37 (08): : 510 - 516
  • [48] Comparison of the efficacy of ketamine- propofol versus sodium thiopental-fentanyl in sedation: a randomised clinical trial
    Bahreini, Maryam
    Garekani, Mostafa Talebi
    Sotoodehnia, Mehran
    Rasooli, Fatemeh
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2021, 38 (03) : 211 - 216
  • [49] Comparison of ketofol (ketamine and propofol) and etomidate in electro convulsive therapy: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Joshi, Chhaya P.
    Thapisrija
    Ayyanagouda, Basavaraja
    Mutalik, Narayan
    Hulakund, Shivanand Y.
    Jalapati, Harini
    INDIAN ANAESTHETISTS FORUM, 2021, 22 (01): : 73 - 78
  • [50] Comparison of Propofol-Fentanyl with Midazolam-Ketamine Combination in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Kidney Biopsy
    Azarfar, Anoush
    Ravanshad, Yalda
    Golsorkhi, Mohaddeseh
    Zahiri, Elnaz
    Fard, Mohamad Gharavi
    Akhondi, Mohsen
    Ghodsi, Alireza
    Ravanshad, Sahar
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2022, 16 (04) : 246 - 251