COMPARISON OF ETOMIDATE, KETAMINE, MIDAZOLAM, PROPOFOL, AND THIOPENTAL ON FUNCTION AND METABOLISM OF ISOLATED HEARTS

被引:0
|
作者
STOWE, DF
BOSNJAK, ZJ
KAMPINE, JP
机构
[1] MED COLL WISCONSIN,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,ANESTHESIOL RES LAB,MILWAUKEE,WI 53226
[2] MED COLL WISCONSIN,DEPT PHYSIOL,MILWAUKEE,WI 53226
[3] VET AFFAIRS MED CTR,MILWAUKEE,WI
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 1992年 / 74卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The authors examined direct myocardial and coronary vascular responses to the anesthetic induction agents etomidate, ketamine, midazolam, propofol, and thiopental and compared their effects on attenuating autoregulation of coronary flow as assessed by changes in oxygen supply/demand relationships. Spontaneous heart rate, atrioventricular conduction time during atrial pacing, left ventricular pressure (LVP), coronary flow (CF), percent oxygen extraction, oxygen delivery, and myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) were examined in 55 isolated guinea pig hearts divided into five groups of 11 each. Hearts were perfused at constant pressure with one of the drugs administered at steady-state concentrations increasing from 0.5-mu-M to 1 mM. Adenosine was given to test maximal CF. At concentrations below 10-mu-M no significant changes were observed; beyond 50-mu-M for midazolam, etomidate, and propofol, and 100-mu-M for thiopental and ketamine, each agent caused progressive but differential decreases in heart rate, atrioventricular conduction time (leading to atrioventricular dissociation), LVP, +dLVP/dt(max), percent oxygen extraction, and MVO2. The concentrations (mu-M) at which +dLVP/dt(max) was reduced by 50% were as follows: etomidate, 82 +/- 2 (mean +/- SEM); propofol, 91 +/- 4; midazolam, 105 +/- 8; thiopental, 156 +/- 11; and ketamine, 323 +/- 7; the rank order of potency was etomidate = propofol = midazolam > thiopental > ketamine; results were similar for LVP. At the 100-mu-M concentration, CF was decreased 11% +/- 2% by ketamine and 5% +/- 3% by thiopental but was increased 17% +/- 6% by etomidate, 21% +/- 5% by midazolam, and near maximally to 57% +/- 10% by propofol; MVO2 was decreased 8% +/- 4% by thiopental, 10% +/- 5% by ketamine, 19% +/- 5% by midazolam, 29% +/- 7% by etomidate, and 37% +/- 5% by propofol; oxygen delivery/MVO2 was unchanged by thiopental and ketamine but was increased 62% +/- 7% by midazolam, 71% +/- 9% by etomidate, and 150% +/- 15% by propofol. Between 100-mu-M and 1 mM, thiopental and ketamine did not increase CF but decreased MVO2 and percent oxygen extraction, whereas propofol maximally increased CF and decreased MVO2 and midazolam and etomidate had intermediate effects. These results indicate that on a molar basis, propofol, and less so midazolam and etomidate, depress cardiac function moderately more than thiopental and ketamine, and that propofol markedly attenuates autoregulation by causing coronary vasodilation. With doses used to induce anesthesia, propofol and thiopental appear to depress cardiac function more than ketamine or etomidate.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 558
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of the Effect of Ketamine, Ketamine-Midazolam and Ketamine-Propofol on Post-Tonsillectomy Agitation in Children
    Fattahi-Saravi, Zeinabsadat
    Jouybar, Reza
    Haghighat, Rezvan
    Asmarian, Naeimehossadat
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 28 (05): : 72 - 81
  • [32] Effects of thiopental, ketamine, and midazolam on nonadrenergic noncholinergic relaxation of isolated rabbit lower esophageal sphincter
    Kohjitani, A
    Miyawaki, T
    Matsuo, R
    Shimada, M
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (3A) : U127 - U127
  • [33] COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF ETOMIDATE, PROPOFOL AND MIDAZOLAM ON CALCIUM AND POTASSIUM CURRENTS IN ISOLATED CANINE VENTRICULAR CELLS
    MARIJIC, J
    BULJUBASIC, N
    BERCZI, V
    SUPAN, DF
    STOWE, DF
    KAMPINE, JP
    BOSNJAK, ZJ
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 79 (3A) : A390 - A390
  • [34] EFFECTS OF PROPOFOL (P), KETAMINE (K), ETOMIDATE (E) AND SODIUM THIOPENTAL (STP) ON PERFORMANCE AND HIGH-ENERGY PHOSPHATE (HEP) METABOLISM IN THE RAT-HEART
    LEEMENGEL, M
    NEUBAUER, S
    HORN, M
    PAULIMAGNUS, C
    FRANTZ, S
    SCHMITT, C
    ERTL, G
    FASEB JOURNAL, 1995, 9 (03): : A393 - A393
  • [35] HEMODYNAMIC-CHANGES AFTER INTRAVENOUS INDUCTION WITH PROPOFOL, THIOPENTAL, METHOHEXITAL, ETOMIDATE, AND MIDAZOLAM IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE
    KLING, D
    LAUBENTHAL, H
    BORNER, U
    BOLDT, J
    HEMPELMANN, G
    ANAESTHESIST, 1987, 36 (10): : 541 - 547
  • [36] DOSE-RESPONSE CURVE COMPARISONS FOR MIDAZOLAM AND THIOPENTAL IN ISOLATED-PERFUSED RAT HEARTS
    SUZER, O
    SUZER, A
    AYKAC, Z
    OZUNER, Z
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 74 : 23 - 23
  • [37] A comparison of thiopental, propofol, and diazepam-ketamine anesthesia for evaluation of laryngeal function in dogs premedicated with butorphanol-glycopyrrolate
    Gross, ME
    Dodam, JR
    Pope, ER
    Jones, BD
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ANIMAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 38 (06) : 503 - 506
  • [38] Emergence agitation after cataract surgery in children: a comparison of midazolam, propofol and ketamine
    Chen, Jiayao
    Li, Wenxian
    Hu, Xiao
    Wang, Dingding
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2010, 20 (09) : 873 - 879
  • [39] Comparison of Propofol, Etomidate, and Thiopental in Anesthesia for Electroconvulsive Therapy A Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial
    Canbek, Ozge
    Ipekcioglu, Derya
    Menges, Okan Oktay
    Atagun, Murat Ilhan
    Karamustafalioglu, Nesrin
    Cetinkaya, Ozlem Zekiye
    Ilnem, Mehmet Cem
    JOURNAL OF ECT, 2015, 31 (02) : 91 - 97
  • [40] Comparison of alfaxalone, ketamine and thiopental for anaesthetic induction and recovery in Thoroughbred horses premedicated with medetomidine and midazolam
    Wakuno, A.
    Aoki, M.
    Kushiro, A.
    Mae, N.
    Kodaira, K.
    Maeda, T.
    Yamazaki, Y.
    Ohta, M.
    EQUINE VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2017, 49 (01) : 94 - 98