COMPARISON OF ETOMIDATE, KETAMINE, MIDAZOLAM, PROPOFOL, AND THIOPENTAL ON FUNCTION AND METABOLISM OF ISOLATED HEARTS

被引:0
|
作者
STOWE, DF
BOSNJAK, ZJ
KAMPINE, JP
机构
[1] MED COLL WISCONSIN,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,ANESTHESIOL RES LAB,MILWAUKEE,WI 53226
[2] MED COLL WISCONSIN,DEPT PHYSIOL,MILWAUKEE,WI 53226
[3] VET AFFAIRS MED CTR,MILWAUKEE,WI
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 1992年 / 74卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The authors examined direct myocardial and coronary vascular responses to the anesthetic induction agents etomidate, ketamine, midazolam, propofol, and thiopental and compared their effects on attenuating autoregulation of coronary flow as assessed by changes in oxygen supply/demand relationships. Spontaneous heart rate, atrioventricular conduction time during atrial pacing, left ventricular pressure (LVP), coronary flow (CF), percent oxygen extraction, oxygen delivery, and myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) were examined in 55 isolated guinea pig hearts divided into five groups of 11 each. Hearts were perfused at constant pressure with one of the drugs administered at steady-state concentrations increasing from 0.5-mu-M to 1 mM. Adenosine was given to test maximal CF. At concentrations below 10-mu-M no significant changes were observed; beyond 50-mu-M for midazolam, etomidate, and propofol, and 100-mu-M for thiopental and ketamine, each agent caused progressive but differential decreases in heart rate, atrioventricular conduction time (leading to atrioventricular dissociation), LVP, +dLVP/dt(max), percent oxygen extraction, and MVO2. The concentrations (mu-M) at which +dLVP/dt(max) was reduced by 50% were as follows: etomidate, 82 +/- 2 (mean +/- SEM); propofol, 91 +/- 4; midazolam, 105 +/- 8; thiopental, 156 +/- 11; and ketamine, 323 +/- 7; the rank order of potency was etomidate = propofol = midazolam > thiopental > ketamine; results were similar for LVP. At the 100-mu-M concentration, CF was decreased 11% +/- 2% by ketamine and 5% +/- 3% by thiopental but was increased 17% +/- 6% by etomidate, 21% +/- 5% by midazolam, and near maximally to 57% +/- 10% by propofol; MVO2 was decreased 8% +/- 4% by thiopental, 10% +/- 5% by ketamine, 19% +/- 5% by midazolam, 29% +/- 7% by etomidate, and 37% +/- 5% by propofol; oxygen delivery/MVO2 was unchanged by thiopental and ketamine but was increased 62% +/- 7% by midazolam, 71% +/- 9% by etomidate, and 150% +/- 15% by propofol. Between 100-mu-M and 1 mM, thiopental and ketamine did not increase CF but decreased MVO2 and percent oxygen extraction, whereas propofol maximally increased CF and decreased MVO2 and midazolam and etomidate had intermediate effects. These results indicate that on a molar basis, propofol, and less so midazolam and etomidate, depress cardiac function moderately more than thiopental and ketamine, and that propofol markedly attenuates autoregulation by causing coronary vasodilation. With doses used to induce anesthesia, propofol and thiopental appear to depress cardiac function more than ketamine or etomidate.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 558
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Inotropic effects of propofol, thiopental, midazolam, etomidate, and ketamine on isolate human atrial muscle
    Gelissen, HPMM
    Epema, AH
    Henning, RH
    Krijnen, HJ
    Hennis, PJ
    denHertog, A
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 84 (02) : 397 - 403
  • [2] ETOMIDATE, MIDAZOLAM, THIOPENTAL AND KETAMINE FOR ANESTHETIC INDUCTION IN HYPOVOLEMIC SWINE
    PASSANNANTE, AN
    KOPP, V
    PERRETTA, S
    HUNT, R
    MCCULLOCH, HA
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 79 (3A) : A624 - A624
  • [3] ANESTHETIC INDUCTION WITH ALFENTANIL - COMPARISON WITH THIOPENTAL, MIDAZOLAM, AND ETOMIDATE
    NAUTA, J
    STANLEY, TH
    DELANGE, S
    KOOPMAN, D
    SPIERDIJK, J
    VANKLEEF, J
    CANADIAN ANAESTHETISTS SOCIETY JOURNAL, 1983, 30 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [4] Effects of thiopental, ketamine, etomidate, propofol and midazolam on the production of adrenomedullin and endothelin-1 in vascular smooth muscle cells
    Hayashi, Y
    Minamino, N
    Isumi, Y
    Kangawa, K
    Kuro, M
    Matsuo, H
    RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS IN MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 103 (03) : 325 - 331
  • [5] Recovery after ECT: comparison of propofol, etomidate and thiopental
    Rosa, Moacyr A.
    Rosa, Marina O.
    Belegarde, Iara M. T.
    Bueno, Celso R.
    Fregni, Felipe
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE PSIQUIATRIA, 2008, 30 (02) : 149 - 151
  • [6] Direct cardiac effects in isolated perfused rat hearts measured at increasing concentrations of morphine, alfentanil, fentanyl, ketamine, etomidate, thiopentone, midazolam and propofol
    Suzer, O
    Suzer, A
    Aykac, Z
    Ozuner, Z
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 15 (04) : 480 - 485
  • [7] A comparison of propofol, thiopental or ketamine as induction agents in goats
    Prassinos, NN
    Galatos, AD
    Raptopoulos, D
    VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 32 (05) : 289 - 296
  • [8] Biphasic EEG changes in relation to loss of consciousness during induction with thiopental, propofol, etomidate, midazolam or sevoflurane
    Kuizenga, K
    Wierda, JMKH
    Kalkman, CJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 86 (03) : 354 - 360
  • [9] Neuroprotective effects of propofol, thiopental, etomidate, and midazolam in fetal rat brain in ischemia-reperfusion model
    Ferhat Harman
    Askin Esen Hasturk
    Mehmet Yaman
    Turkan Arca
    Kamer Kilinc
    Mustafa Fevzi Sargon
    Erkan Kaptanoglu
    Child's Nervous System, 2012, 28 : 1055 - 1062
  • [10] Neuroprotective effects of propofol, thiopental, etomidate, and midazolam in fetal rat brain in ischemia-reperfusion model
    Harman, Ferhat
    Hasturk, Askin Esen
    Yaman, Mehmet
    Arca, Turkan
    Kilinc, Kamer
    Sargon, Mustafa Fevzi
    Kaptanoglu, Erkan
    CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2012, 28 (07) : 1055 - 1062