Analytical modeling of third party service provider selection in lead logistics provider environments

被引:33
|
作者
Bhatti, Rajbir Singh [1 ]
Kumar, Pradeep [1 ]
Kumar, Dinesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Roorkee, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Decision making; India; Servicing; Modelling; Supply chain management; Analytic hierarchy process;
D O I
10.1108/17465661011092641
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to model the choice parameters for selection of third party logistics service providers in global lead logistics provider (LLP) environments. Design/methodology/approach - Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) modeling has been carried out after questionnaire-based survey, results of which were moderated with inputs from experts from industry and academics. Findings - The findings of this study revealed the under lying sub-parameters which come into play while rating/choosing or evaluating service providers in the global LLP situations of today. Research limitations/implications - The number of service providers, selection criteria and the number of members of the AHP assessment team have been identified as some of the limitations of the present work. Practical implications - The study has significant practical implications for the service providers and for the organizations which have to choose them. The fourth party logistics scenario entails this choice to be made by the LLP. Originality/value - This paper deals with inputs from the Indian LLPs and the Indian service providers. With India emerging as the second most important outsourcing destination after China, the assessment of parameters specific to this country while modeling is of practical importance to LLPs beyond the political boundaries of India also.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 286
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Power battery third-party reverse logistics provider selection: Fuzzy evidential reasoning
    Zheng, Chaoyu
    Peng, Benhong
    Zhao, Xuan
    Wei, Guo
    Wan, Anxia
    Yue, Mu
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 36 (01) : 323 - 355
  • [32] Hybrid Intelligent Approach for the Selection of Third-Party Reverse Logistics Provider under Uncertainty
    宫艳雪
    宋俊典
    彭亦功
    添玉
    郑树泉
    Journal of Donghua University(English Edition), 2014, 31 (04) : 484 - 492
  • [33] A Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Sustainable Third-Party Reverse Logistics Provider Selection
    Tajik, G.
    Azadnia, A. H.
    Ma'aram, Azanizawati
    Hassan, S. A. H. S.
    MATERIALS, INDUSTRIAL, AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING RESEARCH ADVANCES 1.1, 2014, 845 : 521 - 526
  • [34] A Hybrid MCDM Approach in Third-Party Logistics (3PL) Provider Selection
    Jovcic, Stefan
    Prusa, Petr
    MATHEMATICS, 2021, 9 (21)
  • [35] Selection of Third-Party Reverse Logistics Service Provider Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making
    Song, Jiekun
    Jiang, Lina
    Liu, Zhicheng
    Leng, Xueli
    He, Zeguo
    SYSTEMS, 2022, 10 (05):
  • [36] Reverse Logistics Service Provider Selection in Communication Enterprise
    Zhou, Sanyuan
    Ii, Meijiao
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS (ITA), 2013, : 27 - 29
  • [37] Study on Third-Party Logistics Service Provider Selection Evaluation Indices System Based on Analytic Network Process with BOCR
    Sun, Chunling
    Pan, Yongming
    Bi, Ran
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOGISTICS SYSTEMS AND INTELLIGENT MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-3, 2010, : 1013 - 1017
  • [38] THIRD PARTY LOGISTIC SERVICE PROVIDER SELECTION USING FUZZY AHP AND TOPSIS METHOD
    Kabir, Golam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2012, 6 (01) : 71 - 79
  • [39] Pricing Policy for Supply Chain with Third-party Logistics Provider
    Wang, Jianpeng
    Tang, Jiayin
    2012 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (SOSE), 2012, : 906 - 908
  • [40] A comprehensive framework for measuring performance in a third-party logistics provider
    Domingues, Maria Leonor
    Reis, Vasco
    Macario, Rosario
    18TH EURO WORKING GROUP ON TRANSPORTATION, EWGT 2015, 2015, 10 : 662 - 672