A comprehensive framework for measuring performance in a third-party logistics provider

被引:33
|
作者
Domingues, Maria Leonor [1 ]
Reis, Vasco [1 ]
Macario, Rosario [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, Ave Rovisco Pais 1, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Performance Measurement Framework; Third-Party Logistics Providers (3PL); Outsourcing;
D O I
10.1016/j.trpro.2015.09.020
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Today, Third-Party Logistics Providers (3PL) face a great pressure in order to meet its clients' needs: customers demand a high level of time and place value for their deliveries, at lower prices, making the last mile activity not only a challenge whilst meeting the clients' requirements but likewise in managing the profitability and the financial balance of the operation. In order to meet the logistics' operation efficiency, several 3PL monitor their activity assisted by a variety of ex-post systems of performance indicators that assess the quality and efficiency of the logistic process. Whereas most of the times 3PL do not fully exploit the potentiality of those performance systems. The objective of this paper is to provide comprehensive and innovative performance measurement framework for a Third-Party Logistics Provider, transferrable for other stakeholders. The framework is supported in a thorough revision of the existing literature regarding performance indicators systems, with particularly significance in the field of logistics and freight transport. The rich variety of logistics' performance indicators arrays frequently focus on a specific domain or follow a typical framework which includes metrics for cost and asset management, customer service, productivity and quality. In order to meet the specifics of a 3PL, we believe that a more detailed framework would be beneficial. The framework we propose is organized in three levels: the activities dimension (e. g. transport, warehousing, and customer service), the decision level dimension (operational, tactical and strategic) and the different actors dimension (e. g. carriers, 3PL and consolidation centers). A case study of Urbanos, a Portuguese 3PL firm, was used to validate the proposed framework. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:662 / 672
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How to choose a third-party logistics provider
    Ackerman, Ken
    Material Handling Engineering, 2000, 55 (03):
  • [2] A framework for evaluating third-party logistics
    Vaidyanathan, G
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2005, 48 (01) : 89 - 94
  • [3] Selection Model for a Third-Party Reverse Logistics Provider
    Yin, Zhihong
    Lu, Qiang
    Cui, Lili
    EIGHTH WUHAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS, VOLS I-III, 2009, : 2857 - 2861
  • [4] WHAT DRIVES THE CHOICE OF A THIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS PROVIDER?
    Anderson, Edward J.
    Coltman, Tim
    Devinney, Timothy M.
    Keating, Byron
    JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2011, 47 (02) : 97 - 115
  • [5] A third-party logistics provider: To be or not to be a highly reliable organization
    Zuniga, Roy
    Martinez, Carlos
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (10) : 4435 - 4453
  • [6] Should you use a third-party logistics provider?
    Verespej, Mike
    Frontline Solutions, 2002, JUNE
  • [7] Pricing Policy for Supply Chain with Third-party Logistics Provider
    Wang, Jianpeng
    Tang, Jiayin
    2012 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (SOSE), 2012, : 906 - 908
  • [8] Logistics cost sharing in supply chains involving a third-party logistics provider
    Lin Jiang
    Yong Wang
    Dongmei Liu
    Central European Journal of Operations Research, 2016, 24 : 207 - 230
  • [9] Logistics cost sharing in supply chains involving a third-party logistics provider
    Jiang, Lin
    Wang, Yong
    Liu, Dongmei
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2016, 24 (01) : 207 - 230
  • [10] Customer orientation, relationship quality, and performance The third-party logistics provider's perspective
    Chu, Zhaofang
    Wang, Qiang
    Lado, Augustine A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2016, 27 (03) : 738 - 754