Who's in and who's out? Studying the effects of communication management on social cohesion

被引:6
|
作者
Verhoeven, Piet [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res ASCoR, Dept Commun Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Social capital; Communication management; Public relations;
D O I
10.1108/13632540810881947
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Purpose - This paper aims at providing a theoretical perspective to study the effects of the communication management/public relations of organizations on the social cohesion of individuals, groups and societies. Design/methodology/approach - The possible connections between communication management and social cohesion, social integration and diversity are explored by looking at the concept of social capital. After discussing aspects of the hypothesis of decreasing social capital and of the hypothesis of increasing contingency of Western societies, questions are raised about the societal role of communication management as a profession that is usually described as being concerned with building relations. To study questions like these empirically, the actor network theory (ANT) is suggested as an analytical perspective and a methodological approach to elaborate the position of reflective communication management. Findings - ANT or the sociology of associations seems a suitable theoretical perspective for studying the relations between communication management, social capital and social cohesion. ANT sheds a light on fact and meaning construction, on issues of power and framing and on coalition building activities and translation: who is bridging or bonding with whom and with what consequences? Originality/value - Research from the perspective of ANT could result in a comprehensive understanding of communication management/public relations incorporating functionalistic, social psychological, relationship and rhetorical approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] WHO'S IN AND WHO'S OUT UNDER WORKPLACE COVID SYMPTOM SCREENING?
    Ruffini, Krista
    Sojourner, Aaron
    Wozniak, Abigail
    JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 40 (02) : 614 - 641
  • [32] Information management - Who's controlling who?
    Noorlander, W
    ONLINE, 2001, 25 (01): : 36 - 38
  • [33] WHO'S IN AND WHO'S OUT? THE COURT'S EMERGING CASE LAW ON THE DEFINITION OF A REFUGEE
    Drywood, Eleanor
    COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW, 2014, 51 (04): : 1093 - 1124
  • [34] Who Let the Drugs Out, and Who's Providing Them?
    McPherson, Mary Lynn
    Broderick, Ann
    Harrold, Joan
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2014, 47 (02) : 389 - 390
  • [35] 'Who is singing out there?' - Sijan,S
    Iordanova, D
    SLAVIC REVIEW, 1996, 55 (04) : 882 - 890
  • [36] Who's in, who's out? Re-evaluation of lipid raft residents
    Mlinac-Jerkovic, Kristina
    Ilic, Katarina
    Zjalic, Milorad
    Mandic, Dario
    Debeljak, Zeljko
    Balog, Marta
    Damjanovic, Vladimir
    Macek Hrvat, Nikolina
    Habek, Nikola
    Kalanj-Bognar, Svjetlana
    Schnaar, Ronald L.
    Heffer, Marija
    JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY, 2021, 158 (03) : 657 - 672
  • [37] Gay and lesbian professionals in the closet: Who's in, who's out, and why.
    Ehrenberg, M
    SEX ROLES, 1998, 38 (5-6) : 497 - 499
  • [38] Who's-in,-who's-out: The cultural poetics of archival exclusion
    Greetham, D
    STUDIES IN THE LITERARY IMAGINATION, 1999, 32 (01) : 1 - 28
  • [39] Who's Controlling Who? Personal Communication Devices and Work
    Rose, Emily
    SOCIOLOGY COMPASS, 2014, 8 (08): : 1004 - 1017
  • [40] Reply - Who's for the WHO and who's not
    Ross, KB
    Wertz, RT
    APHASIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (09) : 893 - 900