Examination of platform and differentiating elements in product family design

被引:0
|
作者
Michael Van Wie
Robert B. Stone
Henri Thevenot
Timothy Simpson
机构
[1] University of Missouri-Rolla,Department of Interdisciplinary Engineering
[2] Penn State University,Department of Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
来源
关键词
Product platforms; Modularity; Product families;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The problems of mass customization, portfolio design, and platform design all pose a common challenge to the designer: knowing how to partition a set of product variants to maximize commonality and simultaneously achieve sufficient differentiation for purposes of customization. This research focuses on the particular issue of how differences between platform elements and differentiating elements are evidenced in the product layout or configuration. The premise of this research is that certain architectural properties, such as modularity, vary between platform and differentiating elements. In particular, certain measures of commonality offer an appropriate set of indices for evaluating these differences in a systematic and repeatable manner. Both function and physical solution commonality provide a descriptor with which to distinguish and rank platform and differentiating elements. By evaluating components of a product in terms of function commonality, physical solution commonality, and modularity, a comparison can be made between platforms and differentiating elements with respect to these indices. The hypothesis of this work is that platforms are integrated and the non-common differentiating elements are, relative to the platforms, more modular. While anecdotal evidence exists to support this idea, the purpose of this work is to evaluate two existing product families as a means for analyzing this hypothesized relation. The result of this research is a descriptive set of knowledge that illustrates distinguishing factors between platform and differentiating elements. The data specifically demonstrates the differences in modularity between platforms and differentiating elements, thus suggesting how this design aspect can and should be addressed during design. While not the focus of this study, future research involving a more prescriptive approach to design can directly benefit from the results. The knowledge gained in this work serves as a foundation for addressing portfolio design where both customization and commonality are key issues.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 96
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The platform configuration for product family production
    Jin, Maozhu
    Chen, Rongqiu
    2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-31, 2008, : 11860 - 11863
  • [32] PRODUCT FAMILY DESIGN: STRATEGIC PRINCIPLES TO CHOOSE BETWEEN PRODUCT-DRIVEN AND PLATFORM-DRIVEN PROCESSES
    Alizon, Fabrice
    Shooter, Steven B.
    Marion, Tucker J.
    Simpson, Timothy W.
    DETC 2008: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL 1, PTS A AND B: 34TH DESIGN AUTOMATION CONFERENCE, 2009, : 1019 - 1029
  • [33] Using product dissection to integrate product family design research into the classroom and improve students' understanding of platform commonality
    Simpson, Timothy W.
    Thevenot, Henri J.
    Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Vol 5, 2005, : 375 - 382
  • [34] Using product dissection to integrate product family design research into the classroom and improve students' understanding of platform commonality
    Simpson, Timothy W.
    Thevenot, Henri J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2007, 23 (01) : 120 - 130
  • [35] PRODUCT FAMILY AND PRODUCT PLATFORM BENCHMARKING WITH COMMONALITY AND VARIETY INDICES
    Simpson, Timothy W.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2017, VOL 2B, 2017,
  • [36] Optimal product family design with platform modularity and component sharing under uncertain environment
    Song, Qinyu
    Ni, Yaodong
    Ralescue, Dan
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2021, 41 (02) : 3573 - 3589
  • [37] Optimal product family design with platform modularity and component sharing under uncertain environment
    Song, Qinyu
    Ni, Yaodong
    Ralescu, Dan
    Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2021, 41 (02): : 3573 - 3589
  • [38] The potential of product family management based on product platform concepts
    Schuh, G
    Ley, W
    Gruenenfelder, MP
    Hofer, AP
    ENGINEERING DESIGN CONFERENCE 2000: DESIGN FOR EXCELLENCE, 2000, : 601 - 611
  • [39] Using product family evaluation graphs in product family design
    Ye, Xiaoli
    Thevenot, Henri J.
    Alizon, Fabrice
    Gershenson, John K.
    Khadke, Kiran
    Simpson, Timothy W.
    Shooter, Steven B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2009, 47 (13) : 3559 - 3585
  • [40] Internet-based intensive product design platform for product design
    Zhou, SQ
    Chin, KS
    Yarlagadda, PKDV
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2003, 16 (01) : 7 - 15