Examination of platform and differentiating elements in product family design

被引:0
|
作者
Michael Van Wie
Robert B. Stone
Henri Thevenot
Timothy Simpson
机构
[1] University of Missouri-Rolla,Department of Interdisciplinary Engineering
[2] Penn State University,Department of Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
来源
关键词
Product platforms; Modularity; Product families;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The problems of mass customization, portfolio design, and platform design all pose a common challenge to the designer: knowing how to partition a set of product variants to maximize commonality and simultaneously achieve sufficient differentiation for purposes of customization. This research focuses on the particular issue of how differences between platform elements and differentiating elements are evidenced in the product layout or configuration. The premise of this research is that certain architectural properties, such as modularity, vary between platform and differentiating elements. In particular, certain measures of commonality offer an appropriate set of indices for evaluating these differences in a systematic and repeatable manner. Both function and physical solution commonality provide a descriptor with which to distinguish and rank platform and differentiating elements. By evaluating components of a product in terms of function commonality, physical solution commonality, and modularity, a comparison can be made between platforms and differentiating elements with respect to these indices. The hypothesis of this work is that platforms are integrated and the non-common differentiating elements are, relative to the platforms, more modular. While anecdotal evidence exists to support this idea, the purpose of this work is to evaluate two existing product families as a means for analyzing this hypothesized relation. The result of this research is a descriptive set of knowledge that illustrates distinguishing factors between platform and differentiating elements. The data specifically demonstrates the differences in modularity between platforms and differentiating elements, thus suggesting how this design aspect can and should be addressed during design. While not the focus of this study, future research involving a more prescriptive approach to design can directly benefit from the results. The knowledge gained in this work serves as a foundation for addressing portfolio design where both customization and commonality are key issues.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 96
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DESIGN OF MULTI-FAMILY PRODUCT PLATFORM BY USING MODULARITY APPROACH
    Abdullah, A. B.
    Kamaruddin, A. R.
    Ripin, Z. M.
    JURNAL TEKNOLOGI-SCIENCES & ENGINEERING, 2005, 42
  • [22] PLATFORM STRATEGY FOR PRODUCT FAMILY DESIGN USING PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION
    Moon, Seung Ki
    Park, KyoungJong
    Simpson, Timothy W.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2011, VOL 5, PTS A AND B, 2012, : 1057 - 1066
  • [23] IDENTIFICATION OF PLATFORM VARIABLES IN PRODUCT FAMILY DESIGN USING SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
    Hume, Chad
    Rosen, David W.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE 2012, VOL 3, PTS A AND B, 2012, : 1001 - 1009
  • [24] JOINT PRICING AND PLATFORM CONFIGURATION IN PRODUCT FAMILY DESIGN WITH GENETIC ALGORITHM
    Qian Li
    Ben-Arieh, David
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL 8, PTS A AND B, 2010, : 49 - 58
  • [25] Guest EditorialProduct Family Design and Platform-Based Product Development
    Jianxin (Roger) Jiao
    Timothy W. Simpson
    Zahed Siddique
    Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2007, 18 : 1 - 3
  • [26] Recent advancements in product family design and platform-based product development: A literature review
    Pirmoradi, Zhila
    Wang, G. Gary
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2011, VOL 5, PTS A AND B, 2012, : 1041 - 1055
  • [27] Modularity analysis and commonality design: a framework for the top-down platform and product family design
    Liu, Zhuo
    Wong, Yoke San
    Lee, Kim Seng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2010, 48 (12) : 3657 - 3680
  • [28] A hybrid model of component sharing and platform modularity for optimal product family design
    Agrawal, Tarang
    Sao, Anuj
    Fernandes, Kiran Jude
    Tiwari, Manoj Kumar
    Kim, Duck Young
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2013, 51 (02) : 614 - 625
  • [29] Hierarchical optimization model in platform-customization association design of product family
    Xia, Yi
    Du, Gang
    Zhi, Hua-Wei
    Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, CIMS, 2013, 19 (11): : 2704 - 2713
  • [30] Product Family Development Based on a Flexible Product Platform
    Huang, Yanli
    Dai, Xiangdong
    Xiao, Yuting
    ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION III, PTS 1 AND 2, 2012, 201-202 : 798 - 803