Digital mapping of soil physical and mechanical properties using machine learning at the watershed scale

被引:0
|
作者
Mohammad Sajjad Ghavami
Shamsollah Ayoubi
Mohammad Reza Mosaddeghi
Salman Naimi
机构
[1] Isfahan University of Technology,Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture
来源
关键词
Machine learning; Soil physical property; Soil mechanical property; Saturated hydraulic conductivity; Soil cohesion; Soil shear strength;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Knowledge about the spatial distribution of the soil physical and mechanical properties is crucial for soil management, water yield, and sustainability at the watershed scale; however, the lack of soil data hinders the application of this tool, thus urging the need to estimate soil properties and consequently, to perform the spatial distribution. This research attempted to examine the proficiency of three machine learning methods (RF: Random Forest; Cubist: Regression Tree; and SVM: Support Vector Machine) to predict soil physical and mechanical properties, saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks), Cohesion measured by fall-cone at the saturated (Psat) and dry (Pdry) states, hardness index (HI) and dry shear strength (SS) by integrating environmental variables and soil features in the Zayandeh-Rood dam watershed, central Iran. To determine the best combination of input variables, three scenarios were examined as follows: scenario I, terrain attributes derivative from a digital elevation model (DEM) + remotely sensed data; scenario II, covariates of scenario I + selected climatic data and some thematic maps; scenario III, covariates in scenario II + intrinsic soil properties (Clay, Silt, Sand, bulk density (BD), soil organic matter (SOM), calcium carbonate equivalent (CCE), mean weight diameter (MWD) and geometric weight diameter (GWD)). The results showed that for Ks, PsatPdry and SS, the best performance was found by the RF model in the third scenario, with R2= 0.53, 0.32, 0.31 and 0.41, respectively, while for soil hardness index (HI), Cubist model in the third scenario with R2= 0.25 showed the highest performance. For predicting Ks and Psat, soil characteristics (i.e. clay and soil SOM and BD), and land use were the most important variables. For predicting Pdry, HI, and SS, some topographical characteristics (Valley depth, catchment area, mlti-resolution of ridge top flatness index), and some soil characteristics (i.e. clay, SOM and MWD) were the most important input variables. The results of this research present moderate accuracy, however, the methodology employed provides quick and cost-effective information serving as the scientific basis for decision-making goals.
引用
收藏
页码:2975 / 2992
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Three-dimensional digital soil mapping of multiple soil properties at a field-scale using regression kriging
    Zhang, Yakun
    Ji, Wenjun
    Saurette, Daniel D.
    Easher, Tahmid Huq
    Li, Hongyi
    Shi, Zhou
    Adamchuk, Viacheslav, I
    Biswas, Asim
    GEODERMA, 2020, 366
  • [42] Hypotheses, machine learning and soil mapping
    Wadoux, Alexandre M. J-C
    McBratney, Alex B.
    GEODERMA, 2021, 383
  • [43] Flood hazard mapping using synthesis hydraulic and geomorphic properties at watershed scale
    Motevalli, Alireza
    Vafakhah, Mehdi
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2016, 30 (07) : 1889 - 1900
  • [44] Flood hazard mapping using synthesis hydraulic and geomorphic properties at watershed scale
    Alireza Motevalli
    Mehdi Vafakhah
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2016, 30 : 1889 - 1900
  • [45] Geospatial digital mapping of soil organic carbon using machine learning and geostatistical methods in different land uses
    Parvizi, Yahya
    Fatehi, Shahrokh
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [46] Digital Mapping of Soil Organic Carbon Using Machine Learning Algorithms in the Upper Brahmaputra Valley of Northeastern India
    Kumar, Amit
    Moharana, Pravash Chandra
    Jena, Roomesh Kumar
    Malyan, Sandeep Kumar
    Sharma, Gulshan Kumar
    Fagodiya, Ram Kishor
    Shabnam, Aftab Ahmad
    Jigyasu, Dharmendra Kumar
    Kumari, Kasthala Mary Vijaya
    Doss, Subramanian Gandhi
    LAND, 2023, 12 (10)
  • [47] A high resolution map of soil types and physical properties for Cyprus: A digital soil mapping optimization
    Camera, Corrado
    Zomeni, Zomenia
    Noller, Jay S.
    Zissimos, Andreas M.
    Christoforou, Irene C.
    Bruggeman, Adriana
    GEODERMA, 2017, 285 : 35 - 49
  • [48] Mapping Soil Properties in the Haihun River Sub-Watershed, Yangtze River Basin, China, by Integrating Machine Learning and Variable Selection
    Huang, Jun
    Liu, Jia
    Ye, Yingcong
    Jiang, Yameng
    Lai, Yuying
    Qin, Xianbing
    Zhang, Lin
    Jiang, Yefeng
    SENSORS, 2024, 24 (12)
  • [49] Soil Erosion Spatial Prediction using Digital Soil Mapping and RUSLE methods for Big Sioux River Watershed
    Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, Ruhollah
    Bawa, Arun
    Kumar, Sandeep
    Zeraatpisheh, Mojtaba
    Amirian-Chakan, Alireza
    Akbarzadeh, Ali
    SOIL SYSTEMS, 2019, 3 (03) : 1 - 15
  • [50] Model averaging of machine learning algorithms for digital soil mapping: A minimum variance framework
    Bogaert, Patrick
    Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, Ruhollah
    Hamzehpour, Nikou
    GEODERMA, 2023, 437