Digital mapping of soil physical and mechanical properties using machine learning at the watershed scale

被引:0
|
作者
Mohammad Sajjad Ghavami
Shamsollah Ayoubi
Mohammad Reza Mosaddeghi
Salman Naimi
机构
[1] Isfahan University of Technology,Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture
来源
关键词
Machine learning; Soil physical property; Soil mechanical property; Saturated hydraulic conductivity; Soil cohesion; Soil shear strength;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Knowledge about the spatial distribution of the soil physical and mechanical properties is crucial for soil management, water yield, and sustainability at the watershed scale; however, the lack of soil data hinders the application of this tool, thus urging the need to estimate soil properties and consequently, to perform the spatial distribution. This research attempted to examine the proficiency of three machine learning methods (RF: Random Forest; Cubist: Regression Tree; and SVM: Support Vector Machine) to predict soil physical and mechanical properties, saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks), Cohesion measured by fall-cone at the saturated (Psat) and dry (Pdry) states, hardness index (HI) and dry shear strength (SS) by integrating environmental variables and soil features in the Zayandeh-Rood dam watershed, central Iran. To determine the best combination of input variables, three scenarios were examined as follows: scenario I, terrain attributes derivative from a digital elevation model (DEM) + remotely sensed data; scenario II, covariates of scenario I + selected climatic data and some thematic maps; scenario III, covariates in scenario II + intrinsic soil properties (Clay, Silt, Sand, bulk density (BD), soil organic matter (SOM), calcium carbonate equivalent (CCE), mean weight diameter (MWD) and geometric weight diameter (GWD)). The results showed that for Ks, PsatPdry and SS, the best performance was found by the RF model in the third scenario, with R2= 0.53, 0.32, 0.31 and 0.41, respectively, while for soil hardness index (HI), Cubist model in the third scenario with R2= 0.25 showed the highest performance. For predicting Ks and Psat, soil characteristics (i.e. clay and soil SOM and BD), and land use were the most important variables. For predicting Pdry, HI, and SS, some topographical characteristics (Valley depth, catchment area, mlti-resolution of ridge top flatness index), and some soil characteristics (i.e. clay, SOM and MWD) were the most important input variables. The results of this research present moderate accuracy, however, the methodology employed provides quick and cost-effective information serving as the scientific basis for decision-making goals.
引用
收藏
页码:2975 / 2992
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hybrid Machine Learning Approach for Gully Erosion Mapping Susceptibility at a Watershed Scale
    Hitouri, Sliman
    Varasano, Antonietta
    Mohajane, Meriame
    Ijlil, Safae
    Essahlaoui, Narjisse
    Ali, Sk Ajim
    Essahlaoui, Ali
    Quoc Bao Pham
    Waleed, Mirza
    Palateerdham, Sasi Kiran
    Teodoro, Ana Claudia
    ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2022, 11 (07)
  • [22] Multi-scale digital soil mapping with deep learning
    Thorsten Behrens
    Karsten Schmidt
    Robert A. MacMillan
    Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel
    Scientific Reports, 8
  • [23] Multi-scale digital soil mapping with deep learning
    Behrens, Thorsten
    Schmidt, Karsten
    MacMillan, Robert A.
    Rossel, Raphael A. Viscarra
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [24] Digital mapping of GlobalSoilMap soil properties at a broad scale: A review
    Chen, Songchao
    Arrouays, Dominique
    Mulder, Vera Leatitia
    Poggio, Laura
    Minasny, Budiman
    Roudier, Pierre
    Libohova, Zamir
    Lagacherie, Philippe
    Shi, Zhou
    Hannam, Jacqueline
    Meersmans, Jeroen
    Richer-de-Forges, Anne C.
    Walter, Christian
    GEODERMA, 2022, 409
  • [25] Optimal Mapping of Soil Erodibility Factor (K) Using Machine Learning Models in a Semi-arid Watershed
    Ghavami, Mohammad Sajjad
    Na, Zhou
    Ayoubi, Shamsollah
    Marandi, Salman Naimi
    Cerda, Artemi
    EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2025,
  • [26] Enhancing the accuracy of machine learning models using the super learner technique in digital soil mapping
    Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, Ruhollah
    Hamzehpour, Nikou
    Hassanzadeh, Maryam
    Heung, Brandon
    Goydaragh, Maryam Ghebleh
    Schmidt, Karsten
    Scholten, Thomas
    GEODERMA, 2021, 399
  • [27] Machine learning for digital soil mapping: Applications, challenges and suggested solutions
    Wadoux, Alexandre M. J-C
    Minasny, Budiman
    McBratney, Alex B.
    EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2020, 210
  • [28] Measurement error-filtered machine learning in digital soil mapping
    van der Westhuizen, Stephan
    Heuvelink, Gerard B. M.
    Hofmeyr, David P.
    Poggio, Laura
    SPATIAL STATISTICS, 2022, 47
  • [29] Synthetic resampling strategies and machine learning for digital soil mapping in Iran
    Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, Ruhollah
    Schmidt, Karsten
    Eftekhari, Kamran
    Behrens, Thorsten
    Jamshidi, Mohammad
    Davatgar, Naser
    Toomanian, Norair
    Scholten, Thomas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2020, 71 (03) : 352 - 368
  • [30] Digital mapping of soil phosphorous sorption parameters (PSPs) using environmental variables and machine learning algorithms
    Saidi, Sanaz
    Ayoubi, Shamsollah
    Shirvani, Mehran
    Azizi, Kamran
    Zhao, Shuai
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIGITAL EARTH, 2023, 16 (01) : 1752 - 1769