Economic comparison of greenhouse gas mitigation options in Germany

被引:0
|
作者
Ronald D. Sands
Katja Schumacher
机构
[1] Pacific Northwest National Laboratory,Joint Global Change Research Institute
[2] Öko-Institut e.V. (Institute for Applied Ecology),undefined
来源
Energy Efficiency | 2009年 / 2卷
关键词
Greenhouse gas mitigation options; Energy efficiency; Fuel switch; Carbon dioxide capture and storage; Non-CO; greenhouse gases; General equilibrium modeling; Economic effects; Climate policy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Our objective is to provide a balanced analysis of greenhouse gas mitigation options, across a variety of climate policy scenarios, for Germany. At least four classes of greenhouse gas mitigation options are available: energy efficiency, fuel switching, CO2 capture and storage (CCS), and reductions in emissions of non-CO2 greenhouse gases. These options vary by cost, timing, and our ability to represent them in an economic analysis. We use the Second Generation Model, an economy-wide computable general equilibrium (CGE) model that embodies greenhouse gas mitigation possibilities from the energy system and CCS. Policy scenarios are represented as a response to varying levels of a price for greenhouse gas emissions, either applied economy-wide or targeted at energy-intensive sectors of the economy according to the EU emissions trading scheme. Energy efficiency options are represented in the standard CGE format where non-energy inputs substitute for energy inputs within economic production functions, or system of consumer demand equations, as the price of energy increases relative to other goods. The electric power sector provides substantial opportunities for fuel switching and the deployment of advanced electricity-generating technologies, with and without CO2 capture and storage. Our methodology relies on engineering descriptions of electricity-generating technologies and how their competitive positions vary with a CO2 price or change in fuel price. Further, we allow for reduction of emissions of non-CO2 gases, which adds a set of mitigation opportunities not usually included in energy-economic modeling efforts. A formal decomposition methodology is used to isolate the contribution of each greenhouse gas mitigation option.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 36
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Greenhouse gas mitigation in Chinese agriculture: Distinguishing technical and economic potentials
    Wang, Wen
    Koslowski, Frank
    Nayak, Dali Rani
    Smith, Pete
    Saetnan, Eli
    Ju, Xiaotang
    Guo, Liping
    Han, Guodong
    de Perthuis, Christian
    Lin, Erda
    Moran, Dominic
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2014, 26 : 53 - 62
  • [42] Greenhouse gas mitigation options in Brazil for land-use change, livestock and agriculture
    Cerri, Carlos Clemente
    Bernoux, Martial
    Ferreira Maia, Stoecio Malta
    Pellegrino Cerri, Carlos Eduardo
    Costa Junior, Ciniro
    Feigl, Brigitte Josefine
    Frazao, Leidivan Almeida
    de Castro Mello, Francisco Fujita
    Galdos, Marcelo Valadares
    Moreira, Cindy Silva
    Nunes Carvalho, Joao Luis
    SCIENTIA AGRICOLA, 2010, 67 (01): : 102 - 116
  • [43] Using life-cycle assessments for the environmental evaluation of greenhouse gas mitigation options
    Nieuwlaar, E
    Alsema, E
    vanEngelenburg, B
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 37 (6-8) : 831 - 836
  • [44] Greenhouse gas emissions from Thailand's transport sector: Trends and mitigation options
    Pongthanaisawan, Jakapong
    Sorapipatana, Chumnong
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 101 : 288 - 298
  • [45] Application of the COMAP model for developing and evaluating forestry greenhouse gas mitigation options in Vietnam
    Hieu, NK
    Carbon Accounting in Forests, 2003, : 56 - 64
  • [46] Greenhouse gas mitigation options in the forest sector of Russia: National and project level assessments
    Vinson, TS
    Kolchugina, TP
    Andrasko, KA
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1996, 20 : S111 - S118
  • [47] MITIGATION OPTIONS AND ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES
    MILLER, A
    MARINE TECHNOLOGY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 1991, 25 (03) : 33 - 41
  • [48] Greenhouse gas emissions projections and mitigation options for the Czech Republic, 1990-2010
    Tichy, M
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1996, 20 : S47 - S55
  • [49] Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture
    Smith, Pete
    Martino, Daniel
    Cai, Zucong
    Gwary, Daniel
    Janzen, Henry
    Kumar, Pushpam
    McCarl, Bruce
    Ogle, Stephen
    O'Mara, Frank
    Rice, Charles
    Scholes, Bob
    Sirotenko, Oleg
    Howden, Mark
    McAllister, Tim
    Pan, Genxing
    Romanenkov, Vladimir
    Schneider, Uwe
    Towprayoon, Sirintornthep
    Wattenbach, Martin
    Smith, Jo
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 363 (1492) : 789 - 813
  • [50] Comparison of integration options for gasification-based biofuel production systems - Economic and greenhouse gas emission implications
    Holmgren, Kristina M.
    Berntsson, Thore S.
    Andersson, Eva
    Rydberg, Tomas
    ENERGY, 2016, 111 : 272 - 294