Economic comparison of greenhouse gas mitigation options in Germany

被引:0
|
作者
Ronald D. Sands
Katja Schumacher
机构
[1] Pacific Northwest National Laboratory,Joint Global Change Research Institute
[2] Öko-Institut e.V. (Institute for Applied Ecology),undefined
来源
Energy Efficiency | 2009年 / 2卷
关键词
Greenhouse gas mitigation options; Energy efficiency; Fuel switch; Carbon dioxide capture and storage; Non-CO; greenhouse gases; General equilibrium modeling; Economic effects; Climate policy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Our objective is to provide a balanced analysis of greenhouse gas mitigation options, across a variety of climate policy scenarios, for Germany. At least four classes of greenhouse gas mitigation options are available: energy efficiency, fuel switching, CO2 capture and storage (CCS), and reductions in emissions of non-CO2 greenhouse gases. These options vary by cost, timing, and our ability to represent them in an economic analysis. We use the Second Generation Model, an economy-wide computable general equilibrium (CGE) model that embodies greenhouse gas mitigation possibilities from the energy system and CCS. Policy scenarios are represented as a response to varying levels of a price for greenhouse gas emissions, either applied economy-wide or targeted at energy-intensive sectors of the economy according to the EU emissions trading scheme. Energy efficiency options are represented in the standard CGE format where non-energy inputs substitute for energy inputs within economic production functions, or system of consumer demand equations, as the price of energy increases relative to other goods. The electric power sector provides substantial opportunities for fuel switching and the deployment of advanced electricity-generating technologies, with and without CO2 capture and storage. Our methodology relies on engineering descriptions of electricity-generating technologies and how their competitive positions vary with a CO2 price or change in fuel price. Further, we allow for reduction of emissions of non-CO2 gases, which adds a set of mitigation opportunities not usually included in energy-economic modeling efforts. A formal decomposition methodology is used to isolate the contribution of each greenhouse gas mitigation option.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 36
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation options for the iron, gold, and potash mining sectors
    Katta, Anil Kumar
    Davis, Matthew
    Kumar, Amit
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 245
  • [32] Mitigation options for nitrogenous greenhouse gas emissions from wastewater treatment plants
    Brotto, Ariane Coelho
    Chandran, Kartik
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [33] Capital assets and institutional constraints to implementation of greenhouse gas mitigation options in agriculture
    Hari Bansha Dulal
    Gernot Brodnig
    Kalim U. Shah
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2011, 16 : 1 - 23
  • [34] Correction to: Gendered impacts of greenhouse gas mitigation options for rice cultivation in India
    Hom Gartaula
    Tek B. Sapkota
    Arun Khatri-Chhetri
    Gokul Prasad
    Lone Badstue
    Climatic Change, 2020, 163 : 2261 - 2261
  • [35] Capital assets and institutional constraints to implementation of greenhouse gas mitigation options in agriculture
    Dulal, Hari Bansha
    Brodnig, Gernot
    Shah, Kalim U.
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2011, 16 (01) : 1 - 23
  • [36] Health and economic benefit of China's greenhouse gas mitigation by 2050
    Xie, Yang
    Wu, Yazhen
    Xie, Mingjun
    Li, Baodi
    Zhang, Hui
    Ma, Teng
    Zhang, Yuqiang
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (10)
  • [37] Economic Potential of Biomass Based Fuels for Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation
    Uwe A. Schneider
    Bruce A. McCarl
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2003, 24 : 291 - 312
  • [38] Greenhouse gas emissions mitigation and economic viability of sugar crops in China
    Yang, Linsheng
    Wang, Xiaozhong
    Zhang, Wushuai
    Lakshmanan, Prakash
    Deng, Yan
    Shi, Xiaojun
    Chen, Xinping
    Zhang, Fusuo
    FRONTIERS OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 11 (03) : 397 - 408
  • [39] Greenhouse gas emissions mitigation and economic viability of sugar crops in China
    Linsheng YANG
    Xiaozhong WANG
    Wushuai ZHANG
    Prakash LAKSHMANAN
    Yan DENG
    Xiaojun SHI
    Xinping CHEN
    Fusuo ZHANG
    FrontiersofAgriculturalScienceandEngineering, 2024, 11 (03) : 397 - 408
  • [40] Economic potential of biomass based fuels for greenhouse gas emission mitigation
    Schneider, UA
    McCarl, BA
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2003, 24 (04): : 291 - 312