FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations—update and clinical examples

被引:0
|
作者
Reinhard Hickel
Arnd Peschke
Martin Tyas
Ivar Mjör
Stephen Bayne
Mathilde Peters
Karl-Anton Hiller
Ross Randall
Guido Vanherle
Siegward D. Heintze
机构
[1] Ludwig-Maximilians-University,Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology
[2] Ivoclar Vivadent,Research & Development
[3] University of Melbourne,Melbourne Dental School
[4] University of Florida,College of Dentistry
[5] University of Michigan School of Dentistry,Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences, and Endodontics
[6] University of Regensburg,Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology
[7] 3M ESPE Dental,undefined
[8] K.U. Leuven,undefined
来源
关键词
Study; Calibration; Composite;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In 2007, new clinical criteria were approved by the FDI World Dental Federation and simultaneously published in three dental journals. The criteria were categorized into three groups: esthetic parameters (four criteria), functional parameters (six criteria) and biological parameters (six criteria). Each criterion can be expressed with five scores, three for acceptable and two for non-acceptable (one for reparable and one for replacement). The criteria have been used in several clinical studies since 2007, and the resulting experience in their application has led to a requirement to modify some of the criteria and scores. The two major alterations involve staining and approximal contacts. As staining of the margins and the surface has different causes, both phenomena do not appear simultaneously. Thus, staining has been differentiated into marginal staining and surface staining. The approximal contact now appears under the name “approximal anatomic form” as the approximal contour is a specific, often non-esthetic issue that cannot be integrated into the criterion “esthetic anatomical form”. In 2008, a web-based training and calibration tool called e-calib (www.e-calib.info) was made available. Clinical investigators and other research workers can train and calibrate themselves interactively by assessing clinical cases of posterior restorations which are presented as high-quality pictures. Currently, about 300 clinical cases are included in the database which is regularly updated. Training for eight of the 16 clinical criteria is available in the program: “Surface lustre”; “Staining (surface, margins)”; “Color match and translucency”; Esthetic anatomical form”; “Fracture of material and retention”; “Marginal adaptation”; “Recurrence of caries, erosion, abfraction”; and “Tooth integrity (enamel cracks, tooth fractures)”. Typical clinical cases are presented for each of these eight criteria and their corresponding five scores.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 366
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical Evaluation of Indirect Composite Resin Restorations Cemented with Different Resin Cements
    Marcondes, Maurem
    Souza, Nielli
    Manfroi, Fernanda Borguetti
    Burnett, Luiz Henrique, Jr.
    Spohr, Ana Maria
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2016, 18 (01): : 59 - 67
  • [32] Clinical Evaluation of Indirect Composite Restorations at Baseline and 36 Months After Placement
    Dukic, W.
    Dukic, O. L.
    Milardovic, S.
    Delija, B.
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2010, 35 (02) : 156 - 164
  • [33] Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations
    Prakki, A
    Cilli, R
    Saad, JOC
    Rodrigues, JR
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 35 (10): : 785 - 789
  • [34] Clinical performance and SEM evaluation of direct composite restorations in primary molars
    Puppin-Rontani, Regina Maria
    Fernando de Goes, Marjo
    Voelske, Cleane Elizabete
    Garcia-Godoy, Franklin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2006, 19 (05): : 255 - 261
  • [35] Clinical Evaluation of Direct Composite Resin Restorations in Fractured Anterior Teeth
    Ramirez Barrantes, Juan Carlos
    Araujo, Edson, Jr.
    Baratieri, Luiz Narciso
    ODOVTOS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2014, 16 : 47 - 61
  • [36] Validation of assessment of intraoral digital photography for evaluation of dental restorations in clinical research
    Signori, Cacia
    Collares, Kaue
    Cumerlato, Catarina B. F.
    Correa, Marcos B.
    Opdam, Niek J. M.
    Cenci, Maximiliano S.
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2018, 71 : 54 - 60
  • [37] Two years of clinical evaluation of direct adhesive restorations in posterior teeth.
    Vieira, LCC
    Lopes, GC
    Maia, EAV
    Baratieri, LN
    Andrada, MAC
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : B128 - B128
  • [38] Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Resin Composite Restorations Placed by Dental Students of Kuwait University
    Al-Samhan, Asmaa
    Al-Enezi, Hanadi
    Alomari, Qasem
    MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2010, 19 (04) : 299 - 304
  • [39] Choosing the Criteria for Clinical Evaluation of Composite Restorations: An Analysis of Impact on Reliabilty and Treatment Decision
    Cavalheiro, Cleber Paradzinski
    de Souza, Pablo Soares
    Rocha, Rachel de Oliveira
    Mendes, Fausto Medeiros
    Braga, Mariana Minatel
    Raggio, Daniela Procida
    Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa
    PESQUISA BRASILEIRA EM ODONTOPEDIATRIA E CLINICA INTEGRADA, 2020, 20 : 1 - 8
  • [40] Three-year clinical performance of two indirect composite inlays compared to direct composite restorations
    Ozakar-Ilday, Nurcan
    Zorba, Yahya-Orcun
    Yildiz, Mehmet
    Erdem, Vildan
    Seven, Nilgun
    Demirbuga, Sezer
    MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2013, 18 (03): : E521 - E528