FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations—update and clinical examples

被引:0
|
作者
Reinhard Hickel
Arnd Peschke
Martin Tyas
Ivar Mjör
Stephen Bayne
Mathilde Peters
Karl-Anton Hiller
Ross Randall
Guido Vanherle
Siegward D. Heintze
机构
[1] Ludwig-Maximilians-University,Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology
[2] Ivoclar Vivadent,Research & Development
[3] University of Melbourne,Melbourne Dental School
[4] University of Florida,College of Dentistry
[5] University of Michigan School of Dentistry,Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences, and Endodontics
[6] University of Regensburg,Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology
[7] 3M ESPE Dental,undefined
[8] K.U. Leuven,undefined
来源
关键词
Study; Calibration; Composite;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In 2007, new clinical criteria were approved by the FDI World Dental Federation and simultaneously published in three dental journals. The criteria were categorized into three groups: esthetic parameters (four criteria), functional parameters (six criteria) and biological parameters (six criteria). Each criterion can be expressed with five scores, three for acceptable and two for non-acceptable (one for reparable and one for replacement). The criteria have been used in several clinical studies since 2007, and the resulting experience in their application has led to a requirement to modify some of the criteria and scores. The two major alterations involve staining and approximal contacts. As staining of the margins and the surface has different causes, both phenomena do not appear simultaneously. Thus, staining has been differentiated into marginal staining and surface staining. The approximal contact now appears under the name “approximal anatomic form” as the approximal contour is a specific, often non-esthetic issue that cannot be integrated into the criterion “esthetic anatomical form”. In 2008, a web-based training and calibration tool called e-calib (www.e-calib.info) was made available. Clinical investigators and other research workers can train and calibrate themselves interactively by assessing clinical cases of posterior restorations which are presented as high-quality pictures. Currently, about 300 clinical cases are included in the database which is regularly updated. Training for eight of the 16 clinical criteria is available in the program: “Surface lustre”; “Staining (surface, margins)”; “Color match and translucency”; Esthetic anatomical form”; “Fracture of material and retention”; “Marginal adaptation”; “Recurrence of caries, erosion, abfraction”; and “Tooth integrity (enamel cracks, tooth fractures)”. Typical clinical cases are presented for each of these eight criteria and their corresponding five scores.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 366
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Testing criteria for clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations.
    Christensen, N
    Tveit, AB
    Qvist, V
    Espelid, I
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : B362 - B362
  • [22] Clinical evaluation of indirect composite resin restorations in large cavities.
    Zarow, M.
    Krupinski, J.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : B339 - B339
  • [23] Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition
    Manhart, J
    Chen, HY
    Hamm, G
    Hickel, R
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2004, 29 (05) : 481 - 508
  • [24] Clinical evaluation of "open sandwich" restorations in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon, M
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A81 - A81
  • [25] Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials
    Cvar J.F.
    Ryge G.
    Schmalz G.
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2005, 9 (4) : 7 - 24
  • [26] Reprint of Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials
    John F. Cvar
    Gunnar Ryge*
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2006, 10 : 92 - 92
  • [28] Treatment of Tooth Wear Using Direct or Indirect Restorations: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies
    Hardan, Louis
    Mancino, Davide
    Bourgi, Rim
    Cuevas-Suarez, Carlos Enrique
    Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
    Zarow, Maciej
    Jakubowicz, Natalia
    Zamarripa-Calderon, Juan Eliezer
    Kafa, Laura
    Etienne, Olivier
    Reitzer, Francois
    Kharouf, Naji
    Haikel, Youssef
    BIOENGINEERING-BASEL, 2022, 9 (08):
  • [29] Evaluation of the marginal adaptation of indirect restorations through optical and clinical microscope.
    Pedrosa, CF
    Soares, CJ
    Pizzi, ECG
    Celiberto, L
    Martins, LRM
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : 246 - 246
  • [30] CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF INDIRECT POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS OVER 3 YEARS
    FREDERICKSON, D
    SETCOS, J
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1994, 73 : 381 - 381