Comparison of seismic behavior of chevron and suspended-zipper braced frames under near-fault ground motion

被引:0
|
作者
Emami F. [1 ]
Bakhtiari-Moghadam M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran
关键词
Brace; Chevron; Near fault; Seismic behavior; Suspended-zipper;
D O I
10.1007/s42107-021-00370-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Chevron braced frame (inverted V shaped) is one of the common lateral load resisting systems in the steel structures. Although this system has high stiffness and resistance, it exhibits poor post-buckling behavior. Following the brace buckling on a story, an unbalanced vertical force enters to the mid-span of the beam which causing failure on that story and finally leading to the destruction of the structure. To avoid this condition, vertical elements known as “zipper columns” are used to transfer the unbalanced force to the upper stories and the hat truss is attached in the top story. This modified system called “suspended-zipper braced frame”. The present paper aims to compare the seismic behavior of the chevron and suspended-zipper braced frames under near fault earthquakes. For this purpose, nonlinear time history dynamic analyses were conducted on the chevron and suspended-zipper braced frames with 3, 6, 9 and 15 stories utilizing commercial general purpose nonlinear program. The selected models were designed in accordance with Iran’s steel provision and Iranian standard 2800. Based on the results, it is observed that the dynamic behavior of the suspended-zipper frames can be better than the chevron frames in drift controlling, maximum displacement of stories and response history of roof displacement under a specific earthquake. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
引用
收藏
页码:1131 / 1141
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of chevron and suspended-zipper braced steel frames
    Ozcelik, Yigit
    Saritas, Afsin
    Clayton, Patricia M.
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2016, 119 : 169 - 175
  • [2] Effect of near-fault ground motion and damper characteristics on the seismic performance of chevron braced steel frames
    Dicleli, Murat
    Mehta, Anshu
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2007, 36 (07): : 927 - 948
  • [3] Seismic Response Investigation of Rocking Zipper-Braced Frames under Near-Fault Ground Motions
    Sarand, Nasim Irani
    Jalali, Abdolrahim
    PRACTICE PERIODICAL ON STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 26 (01)
  • [4] Seismic Collapse Risk Assessment of Braced Frames under Near-Fault Earthquakes
    Sonwani, Jeet Kumar
    Jia, Gaofeng
    Mahmoud, Hussam N.
    Wang, Zhenqiang
    METALS, 2021, 11 (08)
  • [5] Probabilistic seismic assessment of mega buckling-restrained braced frames under near-fault ground motions
    Veismoradi, Sajad
    Darvishan, Ehsan
    EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2018, 15 (05) : 487 - 498
  • [6] Seismic response of buckling restrained braced frames under near fault ground motions
    Baghbanijavid Z.
    Jalali A.
    Yasrebinia Y.
    Journal of Applied Sciences, 2010, 10 (23) : 2967 - 2977
  • [7] Effects of near-fault records characteristics on seismic performance of eccentrically braced frames
    Eskandari, Reyhaneh
    Vafaei, Davoud
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2015, 56 (05) : 855 - 870
  • [8] Seismic analysis and design of general self-centering braced frames under near-fault pulse-type ground motions
    Wang, Yongwei
    Xie, Yazhou
    Zhou, Zhen
    Xie, Qin
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2024, 96
  • [9] Seismic Behavior of a Bridge with New Composite Tall Piers under Near-Fault Ground Motion Conditions
    Cai, Zhehan
    Wang, Zhijian
    Lin, Kaiqi
    Sun, Ying
    Zhuo, Weidong
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (20): : 1 - 17
  • [10] Near-Fault Earthquake Ground Motion and Seismic Isolation Design
    Erdik, Mustafa
    Sadan, Bahadir
    Tuzun, Cuneyt
    Demircioglu-Tumsa, Mine B.
    Ulker, Omer
    Harmandar, Ebru
    SEISMIC ISOLATION, ENERGY DISSIPATION AND ACTIVE VIBRATION CONTROL OF STRUCTURES, 17WCSI 2022, 2023, 309 : 117 - 152