Comparison of seismic behavior of chevron and suspended-zipper braced frames under near-fault ground motion

被引:0
|
作者
Emami F. [1 ]
Bakhtiari-Moghadam M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran
关键词
Brace; Chevron; Near fault; Seismic behavior; Suspended-zipper;
D O I
10.1007/s42107-021-00370-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Chevron braced frame (inverted V shaped) is one of the common lateral load resisting systems in the steel structures. Although this system has high stiffness and resistance, it exhibits poor post-buckling behavior. Following the brace buckling on a story, an unbalanced vertical force enters to the mid-span of the beam which causing failure on that story and finally leading to the destruction of the structure. To avoid this condition, vertical elements known as “zipper columns” are used to transfer the unbalanced force to the upper stories and the hat truss is attached in the top story. This modified system called “suspended-zipper braced frame”. The present paper aims to compare the seismic behavior of the chevron and suspended-zipper braced frames under near fault earthquakes. For this purpose, nonlinear time history dynamic analyses were conducted on the chevron and suspended-zipper braced frames with 3, 6, 9 and 15 stories utilizing commercial general purpose nonlinear program. The selected models were designed in accordance with Iran’s steel provision and Iranian standard 2800. Based on the results, it is observed that the dynamic behavior of the suspended-zipper frames can be better than the chevron frames in drift controlling, maximum displacement of stories and response history of roof displacement under a specific earthquake. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
引用
收藏
页码:1131 / 1141
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Seismic Responses of Asymmetric Base-Isolated Structures under Near-Fault Ground Motion
    叶昆
    李黎
    方秦汉
    Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University(English Edition), 2008, (04) : 335 - 345
  • [22] STUDY ON SEISMIC FRAGILITY OF SHALLOW BURIED UTILITY TUNNEL UNDER NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTION
    Zhang H.
    Wang C.-X.
    Wang D.
    Liu Z.-X.
    Meng S.-B.
    Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics, 2024, 41 (02): : 213 - 221
  • [23] Seismic performance of steel mega braced frames equipped with shape-memory alloy braces under near-fault earthquakes
    Vafaei, Davoud
    Eskandari, Reyhaneh
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2016, 25 (01): : 3 - 21
  • [24] Seismic performance quantification of buckling-restrained braced RC frame structures under near-fault ground motions
    Du, Ke
    Cheng, Feng
    Bai, Jiulin
    Jin, Shuangshuang
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 211
  • [25] Seismic loss and environmental impacts assessment of conventional and emerging steel frames under near-fault ground motions
    Ping, Boyan
    Yu, Shengxin
    Wang, Yifei
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2025, 102
  • [26] Sensitivity analysis of the influence of ground motion intensity levels on the seismic behavior of steel frames in assessment of the target displacement considering near-fault effects
    Esfahanian, Alireza
    Aghakouchak, A.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2020, 47 (04) : 470 - 486
  • [27] Numerical simulation on seismic behavior of subway station structure under near-fault ground motions
    Tang, Baizan
    Chen, Su
    Li, Xiaojun
    Zhuang, Haiyang
    CIVIL, ARCHITECTURE AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2017, : 259 - 264
  • [28] Shaking table tests on the seismic response of slopes to near-fault ground motion
    Zhu, Chongqiang
    Cheng, Hualin
    Bao, Yangjuan
    Chen, Zhiyi
    Huang, Yu
    GEOMECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 29 (02) : 133 - 143
  • [29] Seismic response of embankment dams under near-fault and far-field ground motion excitation
    Davoodi, M.
    Jafari, M. K.
    Hadiani, N.
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2013, 158 : 66 - 76
  • [30] Analysis of Seismic Response of Curved Bridge Subjected to Near-Fault Ground Motion
    Zuo Y.
    Sun G.
    Jin H.
    Li H.
    Zhendong Ceshi Yu Zhenduan/Journal of Vibration, Measurement and Diagnosis, 2018, 38 (04): : 687 - 695