Challenges in adjoint-based optimization of a foam EOR process

被引:0
|
作者
M. Namdar Zanganeh
J. F. B. M. Kraaijevanger
H. W. Buurman
J. D. Jansen
W. R. Rossen
机构
[1] Xodus Group,Department of Geoscience and Engineering
[2] Shell Global Solutions International,undefined
[3] Delft University of Technology,undefined
来源
Computational Geosciences | 2014年 / 18卷
关键词
Adjoint-based optimization; Simulation; Enhanced oil recovery; Foam;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We apply adjoint-based optimization to a surfactant-alternating gas foam process using a linear foam model introducing gradual changes in gas mobility and a nonlinear foam model giving abrupt changes in gas mobility as function of oil and water saturations and surfactant concentration. For the linear foam model, the objective function is a relatively smooth function of the switching time. For the nonlinear foam model, the objective function exhibits many small-scale fluctuations. As a result, a gradient-based optimization routine could have difficulty finding the optimal switching time. For the nonlinear foam model, extremely small time steps were required in the forward integration to converge to an accurate solution to the semi-discrete (discretized in space, continuous in time) problem. The semi-discrete solution still had strong oscillations in gridblock properties associated with the steep front moving through the reservoir. In addition, an extraordinarily tight tolerance was required in the backward integration to obtain accurate adjoints. We believe the small-scale oscillations in the objective function result from the large oscillations in gridblock properties associated with the front moving through the reservoir. Other EOR processes, including surfactant EOR and near-miscible flooding, have similar sharp changes and may present similar challenges to gradient-based optimization.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 577
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An adjoint-based optimization method for gas production in shale reservoirs
    Novotny, Antonio A.
    Murad, Marcio A.
    Lima, Sidarta A.
    ACTA GEOTECHNICA, 2018, 13 (04) : 833 - 852
  • [42] ADJOINT-BASED UNSTEADY AERODYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION OF A TRANSONIC TURBINE STAGE
    Ma, Can
    Su, Xinrong
    Yuan, Xin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBINE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2016, VOL 2C, 2016,
  • [43] Adjoint-Based Constrained Aerodynamic Shape Optimization for Multistage Turbomachines
    Walther, Benjamin
    Nadarajah, Siva
    JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, 2015, 31 (05) : 1298 - 1319
  • [44] Effect of time stepping strategy on adjoint-based production optimization
    Volkov, O.
    Voskov, D. V.
    COMPUTATIONAL GEOSCIENCES, 2016, 20 (03) : 707 - 722
  • [45] Automatic adjoint-based design optimization for laminar combustion applications
    Mayer, Daniel
    Beishuizen, Nijso
    Pitsch, Heinz
    Economon, Thomas D.
    Carrigan, Travis
    FUEL, 2024, 370
  • [46] Adjoint-Based Unsteady Optimization of Turbomachinery Operating with Nonideal Compressible Flows
    Rubino, Antonio
    Colonna, Piero
    Pini, Matteo
    JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, 2021, 37 (06) : 910 - 918
  • [47] Adjoint-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization for Low Reynolds Number Airfoils
    Lei, Juanmian
    He, Jiandong
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2016, 138 (02):
  • [48] Geometric design of electric motors using adjoint-based shape optimization
    Scotzniovsky, Luca
    Xiang, Ru
    Cheng, Zeyu
    Rodriguez, Gabriel
    Kamensky, David
    Mi, Chris
    Hwang, John T.
    OPTIMIZATION AND ENGINEERING, 2025, 26 (01) : 121 - 158
  • [49] A study on the optimization of the deployment of targeted observations using adjoint-based methods
    Bergot, T
    Doerenbecher, A
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2002, 128 (583) : 1689 - 1712
  • [50] TWO ADJOINT-BASED OPTIMIZATION APPROACHES FOR A FREE SURFACE STOKES FLOW
    Repke, Sabine
    Marheineke, Nicole
    Pinnau, Rene
    SIAM JOURNAL ON APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2011, 71 (06) : 2168 - 2184