Challenges in adjoint-based optimization of a foam EOR process

被引:0
|
作者
M. Namdar Zanganeh
J. F. B. M. Kraaijevanger
H. W. Buurman
J. D. Jansen
W. R. Rossen
机构
[1] Xodus Group,Department of Geoscience and Engineering
[2] Shell Global Solutions International,undefined
[3] Delft University of Technology,undefined
来源
Computational Geosciences | 2014年 / 18卷
关键词
Adjoint-based optimization; Simulation; Enhanced oil recovery; Foam;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We apply adjoint-based optimization to a surfactant-alternating gas foam process using a linear foam model introducing gradual changes in gas mobility and a nonlinear foam model giving abrupt changes in gas mobility as function of oil and water saturations and surfactant concentration. For the linear foam model, the objective function is a relatively smooth function of the switching time. For the nonlinear foam model, the objective function exhibits many small-scale fluctuations. As a result, a gradient-based optimization routine could have difficulty finding the optimal switching time. For the nonlinear foam model, extremely small time steps were required in the forward integration to converge to an accurate solution to the semi-discrete (discretized in space, continuous in time) problem. The semi-discrete solution still had strong oscillations in gridblock properties associated with the steep front moving through the reservoir. In addition, an extraordinarily tight tolerance was required in the backward integration to obtain accurate adjoints. We believe the small-scale oscillations in the objective function result from the large oscillations in gridblock properties associated with the front moving through the reservoir. Other EOR processes, including surfactant EOR and near-miscible flooding, have similar sharp changes and may present similar challenges to gradient-based optimization.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 577
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An adjoint-based optimization method for gas production in shale reservoirs
    Antonio A. Novotny
    Márcio A. Murad
    Sidarta A. Lima
    Acta Geotechnica, 2018, 13 : 833 - 852
  • [32] ROBUST ADJOINT-BASED SHAPE OPTIMIZATION OF SUPERSONIC TURBOMACHINERY CASCADES
    Pini, M.
    Persico, G.
    Dossena, V.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBINE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2014, VOL 2B, 2014,
  • [33] Efficient Method to Eliminate Mesh Sensitivity in Adjoint-Based Optimization
    Mura, Gabriele L.
    Hinchliffe, Benjamin L.
    Qin, Ning
    Brezillon, Joel
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2017, 55 (04) : 1140 - 1151
  • [34] ADJOINT-BASED AEROACOUSTIC OPTIMIZATION OF NASA ROTOR37
    Katsapoxaki, Pelagia
    Hottois, Romain
    Thanh-Son Tran
    Schram, Christophe
    Coussement, Gregory
    Verstraete, Tom
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME TURBO EXPO 2023: TURBOMACHINERY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, GT2023, VOL 13C, 2023,
  • [35] Adjoint-based surrogate optimization of oil reservoir water flooding
    Eka Suwartadi
    Stein Krogstad
    Bjarne Foss
    Optimization and Engineering, 2015, 16 : 441 - 481
  • [36] Adjoint-based surrogate optimization of oil reservoir water flooding
    Suwartadi, Eka
    Krogstad, Stein
    Foss, Bjarne
    OPTIMIZATION AND ENGINEERING, 2015, 16 (02) : 441 - 481
  • [37] Adjoint-based unsteady shape optimization to suppress transonic buffet
    Chen, Wengang
    Gao, Chuanqiang
    Zhang, Weiwei
    Gong, Yiming
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 127
  • [38] Effect of time stepping strategy on adjoint-based production optimization
    O. Volkov
    D. V. Voskov
    Computational Geosciences, 2016, 20 : 707 - 722
  • [39] Adjoint-based optimization of experimental designs with many control variables
    Walter, Sebastian F.
    Schmidt, Andreas
    Koerkel, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2014, 24 (10) : 1504 - 1515
  • [40] Adjoint-Based Design Optimization of Nonlinear Switched Reluctance Motors
    Sayed, Ehab
    Bakr, Mohamed H.
    Bilgin, Berker
    Emadi, Ali
    ELECTRIC POWER COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS, 2019, 47 (19-20) : 1705 - 1716