The differential effects of Elaborate Feedback and Basic Feedback on student performance in a modified, personalized system of instruction course

被引:23
|
作者
Chase J.A. [1 ]
Houmanfar R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Psychology/296, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno
关键词
Basic feedback; Elaborate feedback; Large-enrollment course; Personalized system of instruction (PSI);
D O I
10.1007/s10864-009-9089-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Educators in large-enrollment courses are faced with the challenge of effectively disseminating information to their students to ensure that they learn the content provided. A related issue involves the means by which instructors evaluate student performance. Offering effective forms of performance feedback may be one technique to provide students with additional information to facilitate learning. Accordingly, the purpose of this investigation was to determine the effects of elaborate feedback and basic feedback on student performance. Two groups from an introductory psychology course participated in the current study. The Basic Feedback Group (N = 108) received basic feedback on all quizzes. The Elaborate Feedback Group (N = 102) received elaborate feedback on all quizzes. Response accuracy and learning gain were evaluated between groups. Visual analyses demonstrated the relative effectiveness of elaborate feedback on subsequent student performance. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses revealed that elaborate feedback was beneficial in general and particularly for questions that were determined to be difficult by item analyses. Results and implications are discussed in further detail. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 265
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Effects of Genre-Based Instruction and Genre-Focused Feedback on L2 Writing Performance
    Uzun, Kutay
    Topkaya, Ece Zehir
    READING & WRITING QUARTERLY, 2020, 36 (05) : 438 - 461
  • [42] THE INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF CONSONANT AND DISSONANT TEACHER EXPECTANCY AND FEEDBACK COMMUNICATION ON STUDENT PERFORMANCE IN A NATURAL SCHOOL SETTING
    MEANS, V
    MOORE, JW
    GAGNE, E
    HAUCK, WE
    AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 1979, 16 (04) : 367 - 373
  • [43] Effects of Computer-Based, Formative Tests with Diverse Feedback Formats on Student Performance in Science Classes
    Maier, Uwe
    Randler, Christoph
    Wolf, Nicole
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PADAGOGIK, 2016, 62 (02): : 241 - 262
  • [44] Effects of public feedback during RTI team meetings on teacher implementation integrity and student academic performance
    Duhon, Gary J.
    Mesmer, Eric M.
    Gregerson, Lezlee
    Witt, Joseph C.
    JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 47 (01) : 19 - 37
  • [45] Incorporating modified team-based learning into a flipped basic medical laboratory course: impact on student performance and perceptions
    Jing Shen
    Hongyan Qi
    Yingying Chen
    Ruhuan Mei
    Cencen Sun
    Zhengyang Wang
    BMC Medical Education, 22
  • [46] Incorporating modified team-based learning into a flipped basic medical laboratory course: impact on student performance and perceptions
    Shen, Jing
    Qi, Hongyan
    Chen, Yingying
    Mei, Ruhuan
    Sun, Cencen
    Wang, Zhengyang
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [47] The effects of personalized video feedback of basic cardiac life support on knowledge and skills levels in undergraduate nursing students: a randomized controlled trial
    Mohsenzadeh, Habibeh
    Farsi, Zahra
    Afaghi, Effat
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [48] EFFECTS OF 3 LEVELS OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND 2 COGNITIVE LEVELS OF TASKS ON PERFORMANCE IN COMPUTER-DIRECTED MATHEMATICS INSTRUCTION
    WHITE, JA
    TROUTMAN, AP
    STONE, DE
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-BASED INSTRUCTION, 1991, 18 (04): : 130 - 134
  • [49] EFFECTS OF FEEDBACK, LEARNER CONTROL, AND COGNITIVE-ABILITIES ON STATE ANXIETY AND PERFORMANCE IN A COMPUTER-ASSISTED-INSTRUCTION TASK
    HANSEN, JB
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 66 (02) : 247 - 254
  • [50] Exploring the effects of automated tracking of student responses to teacher feedback in draft revision: evidence from an undergraduate EFL writing course
    Cheng, Gary
    INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2022, 30 (02) : 353 - 375