The differential effects of Elaborate Feedback and Basic Feedback on student performance in a modified, personalized system of instruction course

被引:23
|
作者
Chase J.A. [1 ]
Houmanfar R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Psychology/296, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno
关键词
Basic feedback; Elaborate feedback; Large-enrollment course; Personalized system of instruction (PSI);
D O I
10.1007/s10864-009-9089-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Educators in large-enrollment courses are faced with the challenge of effectively disseminating information to their students to ensure that they learn the content provided. A related issue involves the means by which instructors evaluate student performance. Offering effective forms of performance feedback may be one technique to provide students with additional information to facilitate learning. Accordingly, the purpose of this investigation was to determine the effects of elaborate feedback and basic feedback on student performance. Two groups from an introductory psychology course participated in the current study. The Basic Feedback Group (N = 108) received basic feedback on all quizzes. The Elaborate Feedback Group (N = 102) received elaborate feedback on all quizzes. Response accuracy and learning gain were evaluated between groups. Visual analyses demonstrated the relative effectiveness of elaborate feedback on subsequent student performance. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses revealed that elaborate feedback was beneficial in general and particularly for questions that were determined to be difficult by item analyses. Results and implications are discussed in further detail. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 265
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Student Feedback towards Media Based Instruction: Improving Student Retention in Introductory Electronics & Network Analysis course
    Thomassian, Jean-Claude
    Kumazawa, Risa
    2011 ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE & EXPOSITION, 2011,
  • [12] Reliability of Student Feedback on the Course Teaching Evaluation System (CTES) and System Usability
    Jaafar, Azizah
    Abdullah, Shahrir
    Abd Latif, Azian
    Paraidathathu, Thomas
    Ahmad, Wan Noorina Wan
    Abdullah, Narimah
    Daud, Sity
    Salim, Juhana
    Lee, Chan Siew
    KONGRES PENGAJARAN DAN PEMBELAJARAN UKM, 2010, 2011, 18
  • [13] Improving Student Success Rates Through a Semi-Personalized Feedback System
    Mosharraf, Maedeh
    Taghiyareh, Fattaneh
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON E-LEARNING, 2012, : 364 - 369
  • [14] LOCUS OF CONTROL IN RELATION TO ACADEMIC ATTITUDES AND PERFORMANCE IN A PERSONALIZED SYSTEM OF INSTRUCTION COURSE
    KELLER, JM
    GOLDMAN, JA
    SUTTERER, JR
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1978, 70 (03) : 414 - 421
  • [15] EFFECTS OF FADING, FEEDBACK, AND FEEDBACK PLUS INSTRUCTION ON PERFORMANCE OF INSTITUTIONALIZED RETARDED-CHILDREN IN NUMBER RETENTION EXERCISES
    KERN, HJ
    PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 1972, 35 (04): : 243 - 262
  • [16] Effects of a Weight Training Personalized System of Instruction Course on Fitness Levels and Knowledge
    Pritchard, Tony
    Penix, Kellie
    Colquitt, Gavin
    McCollum, Starla
    PHYSICAL EDUCATOR-US, 2012, 69 (04): : 342 - 359
  • [17] An Adaptive Feedback System to Improve Student Performance Based on Collaborative Behavior
    Awais, Muhammad
    Habiba, Ume
    Khalid, Hina
    Shoaib, Muhammad
    Arshad, Shazia
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 107171 - 107178
  • [18] Effects of student engagement in peer feedback on writing performance in higher education
    Jin, Xinquan
    Jiang, Qiang
    Xiong, Weiyan
    Feng, Yanan
    Zhao, Wei
    INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2024, 32 (01) : 128 - 143
  • [20] Effects of training and feedback on Discrete Trial Teaching skills and student performance
    Downs, Andrew
    Downs, Robyn Conley
    Rau, Kathryn
    RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2008, 29 (03) : 235 - 246