Thermodynamic parameters of the LaH10 superconductor were an object of our interest. LaH10 is characterised by the highest experimentally observed value of the critical temperature: TCa=215\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$${{\boldsymbol{T}}}_{{\boldsymbol{C}}}^{{\boldsymbol{a}}}={\bf{215}}$$\end{document} K (pa = 150 GPa) and TCb=260\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$${{\boldsymbol{T}}}_{{\boldsymbol{C}}}^{b}={\bf{260}}$$\end{document} K (pb = 190 GPa). It belongs to the group of superconductors with a strong electron-phonon coupling (λa ~ 2.2 and λb ~ 2.8). We calculated the thermodynamic parameters of this superconductor and found that the values of the order parameter, the thermodynamic critical field, and the specific heat differ significantly from the values predicted by the conventional BCS theory. Due to the specific structure of the Eliashberg function for the hydrogenated compounds, the qualitative analysis suggests that the superconductors of the LaδX1−δH10-type (LaXH-type) structure, where X ∈ {Sc, Y}, would exhibit significantly higher critical temperature than TC obtained for LaH10. In the case of LaScH we came to the following assessments: TCa∈220,267\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$${{\boldsymbol{T}}}_{{\boldsymbol{C}}}^{{\boldsymbol{a}}}\in \left\langle {\bf{220}},{\bf{267}}\right\rangle $$\end{document} K and TCb∈263,294\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$${{\boldsymbol{T}}}_{{\boldsymbol{C}}}^{{\boldsymbol{b}}}\in \left\langle {\bf{263}},{\bf{294}}\right\rangle $$\end{document} K, while the results for LaYH were: TCa∈218,247\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$${{\boldsymbol{T}}}_{{\boldsymbol{C}}}^{{\boldsymbol{a}}}\in \left\langle {\bf{218}},{\bf{247}}\right\rangle $$\end{document} K and TCb∈261,274\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$${{\boldsymbol{T}}}_{{\boldsymbol{C}}}^{{\boldsymbol{b}}}\in \left\langle {\bf{261}},{\bf{274}}\right\rangle $$\end{document} K.
