Multi-criteria Group Decision Making with Various Ordinal Assessments

被引:0
|
作者
Wenjun Chang
Chao Fu
Nanping Feng
Shanlin Yang
机构
[1] Hefei University of Technology,School of Management
[2] Hefei,Key Laboratory of Process Optimization and Intelligent Decision
[3] Ministry of Education,making
[4] Ministry of Education Engineering Research Center for Intelligent Decision-Making & Information System Technologies,undefined
来源
关键词
Multi-criteria group decision making; Various ordinal assessments; Ordinal distribution; Evidential reasoning rule; Internal consistency;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper proposes a method for addressing multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM) problems with various types of ordinal assessments. In addition to two existing types of ordinal assessments including ordinal scale and ordinal interval, a new type of ordinal assessment named as ordinal distribution is developed, which is profiled by a belief distribution on a ranking framework of alternatives. Ordinal scales and ordinal intervals are transformed into ordinal distributions to implement unification of three types of ordinal assessments. Internal consistency about transformation from ordinal scales and ordinal intervals into ordinal distributions is theoretically analyzed and proven. To find solutions, dominating degrees between two alternatives are constructed based on the unified ordinal distributions to determine possibility degree to which one alternative is superior to another. A control mode selection problem for an enterprise located in Changzhou, Jiangsu, China, who mainly manufactures core parts of high-speed train, is analyzed using the proposed method to demonstrate its applicability. Based on the data in the control mode selection problem, internal consistency about transformation from ordinal scales and ordinal intervals into ordinal distributions is verified. It is also verified by simulation in a general case.
引用
收藏
页码:1285 / 1314
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE MULTI-CRITERIA HESITANT FUZZY GROUP DECISION MAKING WITH MULTIMOORA METHOD
    Zeng, Shouzhen
    Balezentis, Alvydas
    Su, Weihua
    ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 2013, 47 (03): : 171 - 184
  • [32] MULTI-CRITERIA GROUP DECISION MAKING IN THE SUPPLIER SELECTION OF CAPITAL PARTS
    Rodrigues, Marcio
    Sirova, Eva
    MM SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2019, 2019 : 3690 - 3694
  • [33] A multi-criteria decision-making model for hotel selection with linguistic distribution assessments
    Yu, Su-min
    Wang, Jing
    Wang, Jian-qiang
    Li, Lin
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2018, 67 : 741 - 755
  • [34] Multi-criteria group decision making with a partial-ranking-based ordinal consensus reaching process for automotive development management
    Wu, Zheng
    Liao, Huchang
    ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022, 35 (01): : 4839 - 4864
  • [35] EVALUATION OF GROUP DECISION MAKING BASED ON GROUP PREFERENCES UNDER A MULTI-CRITERIA ENVIRONMENT
    Wu, Wenshuai
    Xu, Zeshui
    Kou, Gang
    TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2020, 26 (06) : 1187 - 1212
  • [36] A condition number based group correspondence method for multi-criteria group decision making
    Chang, Wenjun
    Fu, Chao
    Ding, Xiaoyi
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 183
  • [37] Multi-criteria probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy group decision making for supply chain finance credit risk assessments
    Li, Ziyang
    Zhang, Xingyu
    Wang, Wenju
    Li, Zhi
    EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2022, 39 (08)
  • [38] Dual Consensus Measure for Multi-Perspective Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making
    Palomares, Ivan
    Crosscombe, Michael
    Chen, Zhen-Song
    Lawry, Jonathan
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2018, : 3313 - 3318
  • [39] Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Models in a Multi-Choice Environment
    Ahmad, Qazi Shoeb
    Khan, Mohammad Faisal
    Ahmad, Naeem
    AXIOMS, 2022, 11 (11)
  • [40] Structure of multi-criteria decision-making
    Brugha, C
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2004, 55 (11) : 1156 - 1168