Multi-criteria Group Decision Making with Various Ordinal Assessments

被引:0
|
作者
Wenjun Chang
Chao Fu
Nanping Feng
Shanlin Yang
机构
[1] Hefei University of Technology,School of Management
[2] Hefei,Key Laboratory of Process Optimization and Intelligent Decision
[3] Ministry of Education,making
[4] Ministry of Education Engineering Research Center for Intelligent Decision-Making & Information System Technologies,undefined
来源
关键词
Multi-criteria group decision making; Various ordinal assessments; Ordinal distribution; Evidential reasoning rule; Internal consistency;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper proposes a method for addressing multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM) problems with various types of ordinal assessments. In addition to two existing types of ordinal assessments including ordinal scale and ordinal interval, a new type of ordinal assessment named as ordinal distribution is developed, which is profiled by a belief distribution on a ranking framework of alternatives. Ordinal scales and ordinal intervals are transformed into ordinal distributions to implement unification of three types of ordinal assessments. Internal consistency about transformation from ordinal scales and ordinal intervals into ordinal distributions is theoretically analyzed and proven. To find solutions, dominating degrees between two alternatives are constructed based on the unified ordinal distributions to determine possibility degree to which one alternative is superior to another. A control mode selection problem for an enterprise located in Changzhou, Jiangsu, China, who mainly manufactures core parts of high-speed train, is analyzed using the proposed method to demonstrate its applicability. Based on the data in the control mode selection problem, internal consistency about transformation from ordinal scales and ordinal intervals into ordinal distributions is verified. It is also verified by simulation in a general case.
引用
收藏
页码:1285 / 1314
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Categorization in multi-criteria decision making
    Yager, Ronald R.
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2018, 460 : 416 - 423
  • [22] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [23] A group stability-based consensus model for multi-criteria group decision-making problems with linguistic distribution assessments
    Ding, Xiaoyi
    Chang, Wenjun
    Liao, Baoyu
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2025, 76 (04) : 708 - 724
  • [24] Multi-criteria group decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy soft topology
    Riaz, Muhammad
    Naeem, Khalid
    Aslam, Muhammad
    Afzal, Deeba
    Almandi, Fuad Ali Ahmed
    Jamal, Sajjad Shaukat
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 39 (05) : 6703 - 6720
  • [25] Multi-criteria linguistic interval group decision-making approach
    Wang Jianqiang
    Chen Xiaohong
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND ELECTRONICS, 2008, 19 (05) : 934 - 938
  • [26] An approach to multi-criteria group decision making with linguistic preference information
    Li, Quan
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NETWORKING, SENSING AND CONTROL, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 494 - 497
  • [27] Subjective and objective information in linguistic multi-criteria group decision making
    Merigo, Jose M.
    Palacios-Marques, Daniel
    Zeng, Shouzhen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 248 (02) : 522 - 531
  • [28] Multi-criteria linguistic interval group decision-making approach
    Wang Jianqiang & Chen Xiaohong School of Business
    Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2008, (05) : 934 - 938
  • [29] Multi-criteria linguistic interval group decision-making approach*
    School of Business, Central South Univ., Changsha, 410083, China
    J Syst Eng Electron, 2008, 5 (934-938):
  • [30] A compromise weight for multi-criteria group decision making with individual preference
    Wei, Q
    Yan, H
    Ma, J
    Fan, Z
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2000, 51 (05) : 625 - 634