The long-term oncological outcomes of the 140 robotic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single surgeon experience

被引:0
|
作者
Vusal Aliyev
Handan Tokmak
Suha Goksel
Serhat Meric
Sami Acar
Hakan Kaya
Oktar Asoglu
机构
[1] Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital,Department of General Surgery
[2] Maslak Acıbadem Hospital,Department of Nuclear Medicine
[3] Maslak Acıbadem Hospital,Department of Pathology
[4] Health Sciences University Bagcılar Training and Research Hospital,Department of General Surgery
[5] Taksim Acıbadem Hospital,Department of General Surgery
[6] Maslak Acıbadem Hospital,Department of General Surgery
[7] Bosphorus Clinical Research Academy,undefined
来源
关键词
Robotic approach; Rectal cancer; TME; Oncological outcomes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Robotic surgery became more popularly in the colorectal surgical field. The aim of the study was to evaluate of the oncological outcomes which patients who underwent the robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. A series of 140 consecutive patients who underwent robotic rectal surgery between January 2012 and June 2019 was analyzed retrospectively in terms of demographics, pathological data, and surgical and oncological outcomes. There were 104 (74.28%) male and 36 (25.71%) female patients. The tumor was located in the lower rectum in 84 (60%) cases, in the mid rectum in 38 (27.14%) cases, and in the upper rectum in 18 (12.85%) cases. Ninety-eight (70%) of the patients has received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. All the patients underwent robotic sphincter-preserving surgery, 101 (72.14%) patients low-anterior resection, and 39 (27.85%) patients underwent intersphincteric resection with colo-anal anastomosis. There were no conversions. The circumferential resection margin was positive in five (3.57%) patients. The median distal resection margin of the operative specimen was 3.2 (0.2–7) cm. The median number of retrieved lymph nodes was 22 (16–42). TME quality in the in our study was rated as complete in 88.57% (n124) of patients, nearly complete in 7.14% (n10) of patients; and 4.28% (n6) of incomplete. The median hospital stay was 3.5 (3–12) days. In-hospital and 1-month mortality was zero. The median length of follow-up was 40 (2–80) months. The 5-year overall survival rate was 92.78%. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 90%. Locally recurrence and distance recurrence rate was 3.57% (n5/140) and 2.85% (n4/140), respectively. Robotic rectal cancer surgery has a good oncological outcomes and feasible tool in the field of the rectal surgery, but required a steep learning curve.
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 661
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robotic male and laparoscopic female sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision of mid-low rectal cancer share similar specimen quality, complication rates and long-term oncological outcomes
    Vusal Aliyev
    Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi
    Elnur Huseynov
    Teuta Zoto Mustafayev
    Vildan Kayku
    Suha Goksel
    Oktar Asoglu
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 17 : 1637 - 1644
  • [42] Multidimensional Analysis of the Learning Curve for Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: Lessons From a Single Surgeon's Experience
    Kim, Hye Jin
    Choi, Gyu-Seog
    Park, Jun Seok
    Park, Soo Yeun
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (09) : 1066 - 1074
  • [43] ROBOTIC VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION FOR SPHINCTER-SAVING SURGERY: A SINGLE-CENTER SERIES OF 400 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS.
    Rouanet, P.
    Bertrand, M.
    Jarlier, M.
    Mourregot, A.
    Carrere, S.
    Quenet, F.
    Colombo, P.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2016, 59 (05) : E327 - E329
  • [44] Comment on: Oncological outcomes after transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
    Gachabayov, Mahir
    Bergamaschi, Roberto
    Wasmuth, Hans
    Faerden, Arne
    Javadov, Mirkhalig
    Cianchi, Fabio
    Nasseri, Yosef
    Barnajian, Moshe
    Popa, Dorin E.
    Lee, Hanjoo
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 110 (11) : 1557 - 1557
  • [45] Perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a retrospective study of 672 patients
    Shadmanov, Niyaz
    Aliyev, Vusal
    Piozzi, Guglielmo Niccolo
    Bakir, Baris
    Goksel, Suha
    Asoglu, Oktar
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [46] Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: Long-term results
    Jacopo Martellucci
    Carlo Bergamini
    Alessandro Bruscino
    Paolo Prosperi
    Pietro Tonelli
    Antonio Todaro
    Andrea Valeri
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2014, 29 : 1493 - 1499
  • [47] Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: Outcomes after 140 Patients
    Lacy, Antonio M.
    Tasende, Marta M.
    Delgado, Salvadora
    Fernandez-Hevia, Maria
    Jimenez, Marta
    De lacy, Borja
    Castells, Antoni
    Bravo, Raquel
    Wexner, Steven D.
    Heald, Richard J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2015, 221 (02) : 415 - 423
  • [48] Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: Long-term results
    Martellucci, Jacopo
    Bergamini, Carlo
    Bruscino, Alessandro
    Prosperi, Paolo
    Tonelli, Pietro
    Todaro, Antonio
    Valeri, Andrea
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 29 (12) : 1493 - 1499
  • [49] Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of long-term survival and urogenital functional outcomes
    Li, Xian
    Liu, Zhen-Hua
    Wang, Ning
    Ding, Jie
    Fan, Fei
    Cen, Xiang-Ying
    Wu, Ming
    Mi, Rui
    Liu, Hang
    Zhang, Yuan-Ling
    MINERVA GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 69 (03): : 403 - 411
  • [50] Long-term results of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: prospective single-center study
    Sidorov, D.
    Petrov, L.
    Lozhkin, M.
    Troitskiy, A.
    Isaeva, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 72 : S63 - S63