The long-term oncological outcomes of the 140 robotic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single surgeon experience

被引:0
|
作者
Vusal Aliyev
Handan Tokmak
Suha Goksel
Serhat Meric
Sami Acar
Hakan Kaya
Oktar Asoglu
机构
[1] Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital,Department of General Surgery
[2] Maslak Acıbadem Hospital,Department of Nuclear Medicine
[3] Maslak Acıbadem Hospital,Department of Pathology
[4] Health Sciences University Bagcılar Training and Research Hospital,Department of General Surgery
[5] Taksim Acıbadem Hospital,Department of General Surgery
[6] Maslak Acıbadem Hospital,Department of General Surgery
[7] Bosphorus Clinical Research Academy,undefined
来源
Journal of Robotic Surgery | 2020年 / 14卷
关键词
Robotic approach; Rectal cancer; TME; Oncological outcomes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Robotic surgery became more popularly in the colorectal surgical field. The aim of the study was to evaluate of the oncological outcomes which patients who underwent the robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. A series of 140 consecutive patients who underwent robotic rectal surgery between January 2012 and June 2019 was analyzed retrospectively in terms of demographics, pathological data, and surgical and oncological outcomes. There were 104 (74.28%) male and 36 (25.71%) female patients. The tumor was located in the lower rectum in 84 (60%) cases, in the mid rectum in 38 (27.14%) cases, and in the upper rectum in 18 (12.85%) cases. Ninety-eight (70%) of the patients has received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. All the patients underwent robotic sphincter-preserving surgery, 101 (72.14%) patients low-anterior resection, and 39 (27.85%) patients underwent intersphincteric resection with colo-anal anastomosis. There were no conversions. The circumferential resection margin was positive in five (3.57%) patients. The median distal resection margin of the operative specimen was 3.2 (0.2–7) cm. The median number of retrieved lymph nodes was 22 (16–42). TME quality in the in our study was rated as complete in 88.57% (n124) of patients, nearly complete in 7.14% (n10) of patients; and 4.28% (n6) of incomplete. The median hospital stay was 3.5 (3–12) days. In-hospital and 1-month mortality was zero. The median length of follow-up was 40 (2–80) months. The 5-year overall survival rate was 92.78%. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 90%. Locally recurrence and distance recurrence rate was 3.57% (n5/140) and 2.85% (n4/140), respectively. Robotic rectal cancer surgery has a good oncological outcomes and feasible tool in the field of the rectal surgery, but required a steep learning curve.
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 661
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] SURGICAL MORBIDITY AND LONG-TERM ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES AFTER SHORT COURSE RADIOTHERAPY AND TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION FOR RECTAL CANCER.
    Lieske, B.
    Robertson, R.
    Barnes, R.
    Gildersleve, J.
    Conaghan, P.
    Farouk, R.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2010, 53 (04) : 643 - 643
  • [32] The need to focus on long-term outcomes after transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
    Angulo-Cruzado, Michelle Antonella
    Luna-Abanto, Jorge
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2022, 24 (03) : 329 - 330
  • [33] Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer
    D'Annibale, Annibale
    Pernazza, Graziano
    Monsellato, Igor
    Pende, Vito
    Lucandri, Giorgio
    Mazzocchi, Paolo
    Alfano, Giovanni
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (06): : 1887 - 1895
  • [34] Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer
    Annibale D’Annibale
    Graziano Pernazza
    Igor Monsellato
    Vito Pende
    Giorgio Lucandri
    Paolo Mazzocchi
    Giovanni Alfano
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2013, 27 : 1887 - 1895
  • [35] LAPAROSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION FOR RECTAL CANCERS. IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES?
    Sukumar, V.
    Saklani, A.
    Kazi, M.
    DeSouza, A.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2022, 65 (05) : 245 - 245
  • [36] Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes
    Bianchi, P. P.
    Ceriani, C.
    Locatelli, A.
    Spinoglio, G.
    Zampino, M. G.
    Sonzogni, A.
    Crosta, C.
    Andreoni, B.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (11): : 2888 - 2894
  • [37] Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes
    P. P. Bianchi
    C. Ceriani
    A. Locatelli
    G. Spinoglio
    M. G. Zampino
    A. Sonzogni
    C. Crosta
    B. Andreoni
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2010, 24 : 2888 - 2894
  • [38] Robotic male and laparoscopic female sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision of mid-low rectal cancer share similar specimen quality, complication rates and long-term oncological outcomes
    Aliyev, Vusal
    Piozzi, Guglielmo Niccolo
    Huseynov, Elnur
    Mustafayev, Teuta Zoto
    Kayku, Vildan
    Goksel, Suha
    Asoglu, Oktar
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (04) : 1637 - 1644
  • [39] TRANSANAL TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION (TATME): LONG-TERM ONCOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES.
    Abedrapo, M.
    Carrillo, K.
    Sanguineti, A.
    Lopez, S.
    Azolas, R.
    Diaz, M.
    Llanos, J.
    Bocic, G.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2017, 60 (06) : E250 - E250
  • [40] The Impact of a Modular Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision Training Program on Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes in Robotic Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Stefan, Samuel
    Piozzi, Guglielmo
    Tejedor, Patricia
    Liao, Christopher
    Ahmad, Anwar
    Ahmad, Nasir
    Naqvi, Syed
    Heald, Richard
    Khan, Jim
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2024, 67 (11) : 1485 - 1494