Size effect on double-K fracture parameters of concrete based on fracture extreme theory

Based on fracture extreme theory (FET), the size effect on initial fracture toughness KIini\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$K_{\mathrm{I}}^{\mathrm{ini}}$$\end{document} and unstable fracture toughness KIun\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$K_{\mathrm{I}}^{\mathrm{un}}$$\end{document} of concrete for three-point bending beam was investigated. Nine groups of geometrically similar specimen were simulated to obtain peak load and critical crack mouth opening displacement, of which specimen depth was from 200 to 1000 mm and initial crack length-to-depth ratios were from 0.1 to 0.6. The KIini\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$K_{\mathrm{I}}^{\mathrm{ini}}$$\end{document} and KIun\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$K_{\mathrm{I}}^{\mathrm{un}}$$\end{document} were calculated by FET and double-K method, in which FET adopted the linear, bilinear, and trilinear cohesive stress distribution assumptions and double-K method only used the linear cohesive stress distribution assumption. With linear cohesive stress distribution assumption, KIini\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$K_{\mathrm{I}}^{\mathrm{ini}}$$\end{document} and KIun\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$K_{\mathrm{I}}^{\mathrm{un}}$$\end{document} determined by FET and double- K method were compared. Then, the influence of specimen depth on KIini\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$K_{\mathrm{I}}^{\mathrm{ini}}$$\end{document} and KIun\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$K_{\mathrm{I}}^{\mathrm{un}}$$\end{document} was discussed. In addition, KIini/KIun\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$K_{\mathrm{I}}^{\mathrm{ini}}/K_{\mathrm{I}}^{\mathrm{un}}$$\end{document} calculated via FET using different cohesive stress distribution assumptions were analyzed.