Scientific Challenges, Opportunities and Priorities for the U.S. Fusion Energy Sciences Program

被引:0
|
作者
Charles Baker
Stewart Prager
Mohamed Abdou
Lee Berry
Riccardo Betti
Vincent Chan
Darren Craig
Jill Dahlburg
Ronald Davidson
James Drake
Richard Hawryluk
David Hill
Amanda Hubbard
Grant Logan
Earl Marmar
Michael Mauel
Kathryn McCarthy
Scott Parker
Ned Sauthoff
Ronald Stambaugh
Michael Ulrickson
James Van Dam
Glen Wurden
Michael Zarnstorff
Steven Zinkle
机构
[1] Sandia National Laboratories,
[2] University of Wisconsin,undefined
[3] University of California,undefined
[4] Oak Ridge National Laboratory,undefined
[5] University of Rochester,undefined
[6] General Atomics,undefined
[7] Naval Research Laboratory,undefined
[8] Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory,undefined
[9] University of Maryland,undefined
[10] Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,undefined
[11] Massachusetts Institute of Technology,undefined
[12] Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,undefined
[13] Columbia University,undefined
[14] Idaho National Engineering & Environmental Laboratory,undefined
[15] University of Colorado,undefined
[16] University of Texas-Austin,undefined
[17] Los Alamos National Laboratory,undefined
来源
Journal of Fusion Energy | 2005年 / 24卷
关键词
Fusion science; fusion energy; fusion priorities;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In October 2003, Dr. Raymond Orbach, Director of the Department of Energy’s Office of Science, issued a charge to the Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (FESAC) “to identify the major science and technology issues that need to be addressed, recommend how to organize campaigns to address these issues, and recommend the priority order for these campaigns.” The sections in this report document the results of the Panel’s work. The first two sections describe the concepts of the overarching themes, topical scientific questions, and campaigns. The next six sections (Sections 3–8) describe in detail the six scientific campaigns. Section 9 describes some important enabling research activities necessary for the campaigns. Sections 10–12 describe the overarching themes, which provide a crosscutting perspective of the activities in the six campaigns. Finally, the Panel’s recommendations are set forth in Section 13. The charge letter to the panel is provided as Appendix A; the FESAC response letter is provided as Appendix D.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 114
页数:101
相关论文
共 50 条