Scientific Challenges, Opportunities and Priorities for the U.S. Fusion Energy Sciences Program

被引:0
|
作者
Charles Baker
Stewart Prager
Mohamed Abdou
Lee Berry
Riccardo Betti
Vincent Chan
Darren Craig
Jill Dahlburg
Ronald Davidson
James Drake
Richard Hawryluk
David Hill
Amanda Hubbard
Grant Logan
Earl Marmar
Michael Mauel
Kathryn McCarthy
Scott Parker
Ned Sauthoff
Ronald Stambaugh
Michael Ulrickson
James Van Dam
Glen Wurden
Michael Zarnstorff
Steven Zinkle
机构
[1] Sandia National Laboratories,
[2] University of Wisconsin,undefined
[3] University of California,undefined
[4] Oak Ridge National Laboratory,undefined
[5] University of Rochester,undefined
[6] General Atomics,undefined
[7] Naval Research Laboratory,undefined
[8] Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory,undefined
[9] University of Maryland,undefined
[10] Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,undefined
[11] Massachusetts Institute of Technology,undefined
[12] Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,undefined
[13] Columbia University,undefined
[14] Idaho National Engineering & Environmental Laboratory,undefined
[15] University of Colorado,undefined
[16] University of Texas-Austin,undefined
[17] Los Alamos National Laboratory,undefined
来源
Journal of Fusion Energy | 2005年 / 24卷
关键词
Fusion science; fusion energy; fusion priorities;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In October 2003, Dr. Raymond Orbach, Director of the Department of Energy’s Office of Science, issued a charge to the Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (FESAC) “to identify the major science and technology issues that need to be addressed, recommend how to organize campaigns to address these issues, and recommend the priority order for these campaigns.” The sections in this report document the results of the Panel’s work. The first two sections describe the concepts of the overarching themes, topical scientific questions, and campaigns. The next six sections (Sections 3–8) describe in detail the six scientific campaigns. Section 9 describes some important enabling research activities necessary for the campaigns. Sections 10–12 describe the overarching themes, which provide a crosscutting perspective of the activities in the six campaigns. Finally, the Panel’s recommendations are set forth in Section 13. The charge letter to the panel is provided as Appendix A; the FESAC response letter is provided as Appendix D.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 114
页数:101
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] U.S. Health Disparities - Opportunities for Radiologists
    Kadom, Nadja
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 48 (04) : 303 - 304
  • [33] U.S. Fusion Energy Development via Public-Private Partnerships
    Scott C. Hsu
    Journal of Fusion Energy, 2023, 42
  • [34] U.S. SCIENCE BUDGET Bigger Contribution to ITER Erodes Domestic Fusion Program
    Cho, Adrian
    SCIENCE, 2012, 335 (6071) : 901 - 902
  • [35] Trajectories in land use change around U.S. National Parks and challenges and opportunities for management
    Davis, Cory R.
    Hansen, Andrew J.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2011, 21 (08) : 3299 - 3316
  • [36] The Challenges and Opportunities Faced by Skilled African Immigrants in the U.S. Job Market: A Personal Perspective
    Andemariam, Ephrem M.
    JOURNAL OF IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE STUDIES, 2007, 5 (01) : 111 - 116
  • [37] Five U.S. Power Companies Adopt WWF Energy Switch Program
    Power Engineering (Barrington, Illinois), 2004, 108 (03):
  • [38] Research Priorities for Healthcare Chaplaincy: Views of U.S. Chaplains
    Damen, Annelieke
    Delaney, Allison
    Fitchett, George
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE CHAPLAINCY, 2018, 24 (02) : 57 - 66
  • [40] Scientific workflows for computational reproducibility in the life sciences: Status, challenges and opportunities
    Cohen-Boulakia, Sarah
    Belhajjame, Khalid
    Collin, Olivier
    Chopard, Jerome
    Froidevaux, Christine
    Gaignard, Alban
    Hinsen, Konrad
    Larmande, Pierre
    Le Brass, Yvan
    Lemoine, Frederic
    Mareuil, Fabien
    Menager, Herve
    Pradal, Christophe
    Blanchet, Christophe
    FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2017, 75 : 284 - 298