Quantifying the effect of experimental perturbations at single-cell resolution

被引:0
|
作者
Daniel B. Burkhardt
Jay S. Stanley
Alexander Tong
Ana Luisa Perdigoto
Scott A. Gigante
Kevan C. Herold
Guy Wolf
Antonio J. Giraldez
David van Dijk
Smita Krishnaswamy
机构
[1] Yale University,Department of Genetics
[2] Yale University,Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Program
[3] Yale University,Department of Computer Science
[4] Yale University,Department of Immunobiology
[5] Yale University,Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology)
[6] Université de Montréal,Department of Mathematics and Statistics
[7] Mila – Quebec AI Institute,undefined
来源
Nature Biotechnology | 2021年 / 39卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Current methods for comparing single-cell RNA sequencing datasets collected in multiple conditions focus on discrete regions of the transcriptional state space, such as clusters of cells. Here we quantify the effects of perturbations at the single-cell level using a continuous measure of the effect of a perturbation across the transcriptomic space. We describe this space as a manifold and develop a relative likelihood estimate of observing each cell in each of the experimental conditions using graph signal processing. This likelihood estimate can be used to identify cell populations specifically affected by a perturbation. We also develop vertex frequency clustering to extract populations of affected cells at the level of granularity that matches the perturbation response. The accuracy of our algorithm at identifying clusters of cells that are enriched or depleted in each condition is, on average, 57% higher than the next-best-performing algorithm tested. Gene signatures derived from these clusters are more accurate than those of six alternative algorithms in ground truth comparisons.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 629
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantifying the effect of experimental perturbations at single-cell resolution
    Burkhardt, Daniel B.
    Stanley, Jay S., III
    Tong, Alexander
    Perdigoto, Ana Luisa
    Gigante, Scott A.
    Herold, Kevan C.
    Wolf, Guy
    Giraldez, Antonio J.
    van Dijk, David
    Krishnaswamy, Smita
    NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 39 (05) : 619 - +
  • [2] Factoring single-cell perturbations
    Song, Bicna
    Li, Wei
    NATURE METHODS, 2023,
  • [3] Factoring single-cell perturbations
    Bicna Song
    Wei Li
    Nature Methods, 2023, 20 : 1629 - 1630
  • [4] Factoring single-cell perturbations
    Song, Bicna
    Li, Wei
    NATURE METHODS, 2023, 20 (11) : 1629 - 1630
  • [5] Predicting Cellular Responses to Novel Drug Perturbations at a Single-Cell Resolution
    Hetzel, Leon
    Boehm, Simon
    Kilbertus, Niki
    Guennemann, Stephan
    Lotfollahi, Mohammad
    Theis, Fabian
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 35 (NEURIPS 2022), 2022,
  • [6] Quantifying the Integration of Quorum-Sensing Signals with Single-Cell Resolution
    Long, Tao
    Tu, Kimberly C.
    Wang, Yufang
    Mehta, Pankaj
    Ong, N. P.
    Bassler, Bonnie L.
    Wingreen, Ned S.
    PLOS BIOLOGY, 2009, 7 (03): : 640 - 649
  • [7] Effect of aging on the human myometrium at single-cell resolution
    Punzon-Jimenez, Paula
    Machado-Lopez, Alba
    Perez-Moraga, Raul
    Llera-Oyola, Jaime
    Grases, Daniela
    Galvez-Viedma, Marta
    Sibai, Mustafa
    Satorres-Perez, Elena
    Lopez-Agullo, Susana
    Badenes, Rafael
    Ferrer-Gomez, Carolina
    Porta-Pardo, Eduard
    Roson, Beatriz
    Simon, Carlos
    Mas, Aymara
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [8] Quantifying how TCR sequence variation affects T cell fate at single-cell resolution
    Lagattuta, Kaitlyn
    Kwun, Mujin
    Raychaudhuri, Soumya
    JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 2023, 210 (01):
  • [9] Carcinogenesis at single-cell resolution
    Senft, Daniela
    NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2024, 24 (08) : 520 - 520
  • [10] Hematopoiesis at single-cell resolution
    Bryder, David
    BLOOD, 2016, 128 (08) : 1025 - 1026