Current perspectives on Gleason grading of prostate cancer

被引：25
|
作者：
Iczkowski K.A. [1 ]
Lucia M.S. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Campus Mail Stop 8104, Aurora, CO 80045, RC-1 North
来源：
Current Urology Reports | 2011年 / 12卷 / 3期
关键词：
Grading; Modified Gleason; Pattern; Prostate cancer;
D O I：
10.1007/s11934-011-0181-5
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The 5-tier Gleason grading system for prostate cancer, introduced in 1966, has been proven to be one of the main independent predictors of prostate cancer outcome. This review addresses interobserver concordance in Gleason grading; the persistence of grading discrepancies with frequent upgrading from the biopsy to the prostatectomy specimen; the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathologists' modifications to Gleason grading; the impact of this modified grading on grade migration and outcome prediction; and molecular correlates of cancer morphology. Data from the most recent years are emphasized. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码：216 / 222
页数：6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Interobserver reproducibility of gleason grading of prostate carcinoma
    Oyama, T
    Allsbrook, W
    Kurokawa, K
    Mikami, Y
    Segawa, A
    Sano, T
    Nakajima, T
    Suzuki, K
    Mangold, K
    Epstein, J
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2003, 83 (01) : 164A - 165A
  • [32] CANCER OF THE PROSTATE - CURRENT PERSPECTIVES
    HILARIS, BS
    NORI, D
    BATATA, M
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 1987, 5 (05) : 459 - 468
  • [33] Faster and Better: Artificial Intelligence Assisted Gleason Group Grading in Prostate Cancer
    Juhila, Juuso
    Kovala, Marja
    Noora, Neittaanmaki
    Puttonen, Henri
    Manninen, Anniina
    Wester, Anniina
    Blom, Sami
    Karjalainen, Marika
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2023, 103 (03) : S1295 - S1296
  • [34] Reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostate cancer can be improved by the use of reference images
    Egevad, L
    UROLOGY, 2001, 57 (02) : 291 - 295
  • [35] Re: Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer: The PANDA Challenge
    Bulten, W.
    Karatasalo, K.
    Chen, P. Cameron
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 82 (05) : 571 - 571
  • [36] Recent trends in Gleason grading of prostate cancer - I. Pattern interpretation
    Egevad, Lars
    ANALYTICAL AND QUANTITATIVE CYTOLOGY AND HISTOLOGY, 2008, 30 (04): : 190 - 198
  • [37] Quantitation of hypoechoic lesions for the prediction and Gleason grading of prostate cancer: a prospective study
    Lee, Kwang Suk
    Koo, Kyo Chul
    Chung, Byung Ha
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (07) : 1059 - 1065
  • [38] Ultrasonographic pathological grading of prostate cancer using automatic region-based Gleason grading network
    Lu, Xu
    Zhang, Shulian
    Liu, Zhiyong
    Liu, Shaopeng
    Huang, Jun
    Kong, Guoquan
    Li, Mingzhu
    Liang, Yinying
    Cui, Yunneng
    Yang, Chuan
    Zhao, Shen
    COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 2022, 102
  • [39] Nuclear Grading Versus Gleason Grading in Small Samples Containing Prostate Cancer: A Tissue Microarray Study
    Wittschieber, Daniel
    Koellermann, Jens
    Schlomm, Thorsten
    Sauter, Guido
    Erbersdobler, Andreas
    PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH, 2010, 16 (04) : 479 - 484
  • [40] THE "NEW" ISUP MODIFIED GLEASON GRADING SYSTEM AND ICCR DATASETS FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Kench, J.
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 11 : 30 - 30
12345