The Ancillary Benefits from Climate Policy in the United States

被引:1
|
作者
Britt Groosman
Nicholas Z. Muller
Erin O’Neill-Toy
机构
[1] Environmental Defense Fund,Economics Department
[2] Middlebury College,undefined
来源
关键词
Climate change; Co-benefits; Local air pollution; Human health; Value of a statistical life;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study investigates the benefits to human health that would occur in the United States (US) due to reductions in local air pollutant emissions stemming from a federal policy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In order to measure the impacts of reduced emissions of local pollutants, this study considers the Warner-Lieberman bill (S.2191) of 2007 and the paper considers the impacts of reduced emissions in the transport and electric power sectors. This analysis provides strong evidence that climate change policy in the US will generate significant returns to society in excess of the benefits due to climate stabilization. The total health-related co-benefits associated with a representative climate policy over the years 2010–2030 range between $103 billion and $1.2 trillion in present value terms. Much of the co-benefit stems from between 32,000 and 189,000 avoided premature mortalities associated with exposure to PM2.5 and O3. Most of the co-benefits are due to reduced emissions of SO2 from coal-fired power plants since these are an important contribution to ambient concentrations of PM2.5. Among the most important determinants of co-benefits is the relationship between climate policy and existing policies governing SO2 discharges from coal-fired power generation capacity. If SO2 emissions are permitted to remain at current levels, total co-benefits are cut by 65%. We find that the co-benefit per ton of CO2 emissions ranges between $1 and $77 depending on modeling assumptions and year.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 603
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Titans of the Climate: Explaining Policy Process in the United States and China
    Wu, Fengshi
    CHINA JOURNAL, 2020, 83 : 172 - 174
  • [32] The Water Problem: Climate Change and Water Policy in the United States
    Rad, Mani Rouhi
    WATER ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2018, 4 (03)
  • [33] Shift in the United States Climate Policy and the Arctic Council Agenda
    Sakharov, Andrei
    VESTNIK MEZHDUNARODNYKH ORGANIZATSII-INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2018, 13 (01): : 66 - 79
  • [34] CLIMATE CHANGE AND UNITED-STATES ENERGY-POLICY
    STREETS, DG
    BLOYD, CN
    BOYD, GA
    SANTINI, DJ
    VESELKA, TD
    ENERGY, 1991, 16 (11-12) : 1437 - 1466
  • [35] Advocacy coalitions, beliefs and climate change policy in the United States
    Kukkonen, Anna
    Yla-Anttila, Tuomas
    Broadbent, Jeffrey
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2017, 95 (03) : 713 - 729
  • [36] Adding A Climate Lens To Health Policy In The United States COMMENT
    Salas, Renee N.
    Friend, Tynan H.
    Bernstein, Aaron
    Jha, Ashish K.
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2020, 39 (12) : 2063 - 2070
  • [37] CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY OF THE UNITED STATES: DILEMMA OF COMMITMENT OR DENIAL
    Uysal Oguz, Ceren
    JOURNAL OF MEHMET AKIF ERSOY UNIVERSITY ECONOMICS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES FACULTY, 2019, 6 (02): : 523 - 543
  • [38] The road not taken: Climate change policy in Canada and the United States
    Harrison, Kathryn
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2007, 7 (04) : 92 - +
  • [39] UNITED-STATES HEALTH MANPOWER POLICY - WILL BENEFITS JUSTIFY COSTS
    MORROW, JH
    EDWARDS, AB
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1976, 51 (10): : 791 - 805
  • [40] Climate policy uncertainty and regional innovation performance: New empirical evidence from the United States
    Farooq, Umar
    Shafiq, Muhammad Nouman
    Subhani, Bilal Haider
    Gillani, Seemab
    MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2024, 45 (03) : 1497 - 1510