The Ancillary Benefits from Climate Policy in the United States

被引:1
|
作者
Britt Groosman
Nicholas Z. Muller
Erin O’Neill-Toy
机构
[1] Environmental Defense Fund,Economics Department
[2] Middlebury College,undefined
来源
关键词
Climate change; Co-benefits; Local air pollution; Human health; Value of a statistical life;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study investigates the benefits to human health that would occur in the United States (US) due to reductions in local air pollutant emissions stemming from a federal policy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In order to measure the impacts of reduced emissions of local pollutants, this study considers the Warner-Lieberman bill (S.2191) of 2007 and the paper considers the impacts of reduced emissions in the transport and electric power sectors. This analysis provides strong evidence that climate change policy in the US will generate significant returns to society in excess of the benefits due to climate stabilization. The total health-related co-benefits associated with a representative climate policy over the years 2010–2030 range between $103 billion and $1.2 trillion in present value terms. Much of the co-benefit stems from between 32,000 and 189,000 avoided premature mortalities associated with exposure to PM2.5 and O3. Most of the co-benefits are due to reduced emissions of SO2 from coal-fired power plants since these are an important contribution to ambient concentrations of PM2.5. Among the most important determinants of co-benefits is the relationship between climate policy and existing policies governing SO2 discharges from coal-fired power generation capacity. If SO2 emissions are permitted to remain at current levels, total co-benefits are cut by 65%. We find that the co-benefit per ton of CO2 emissions ranges between $1 and $77 depending on modeling assumptions and year.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 603
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CLIMATE REPORT FROM THE UNITED STATES
    Bay-Cheng, Sarah
    PERFORMANCE RESEARCH, 2018, 23 (03) : 112 - 112
  • [22] Willingness to Pay for Ancillary Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation
    Longo, Alberto
    Hoyos, David
    Markandya, Anil
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2012, 51 (01): : 119 - 140
  • [23] Willingness to Pay for Ancillary Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation
    Alberto Longo
    David Hoyos
    Anil Markandya
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2012, 51 : 119 - 140
  • [24] The impact of climate change on mortality in the United States: Benefits and costs of adaptation
    Deschenes, Olivier
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2022, 55 (03): : 1227 - 1249
  • [25] Economic and Climate Benefits of Electric Vehicles in China, the United States, and Germany
    He, Xiaoyi
    Zhang, Shaojun
    Wu, Ye
    Wallington, Timothy J.
    Lu, Xi
    Tamor, Michael A.
    McElroy, Michael B.
    Zhang, K. Max
    Nielsen, Chris P.
    Hao, Jiming
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 53 (18) : 11013 - 11022
  • [26] The health, climate, and equity benefits of freight truck electrification in the United States
    Hennessy, Eleanor M.
    Scown, Corinne D.
    Azevedo, Ines M. L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 19 (10):
  • [27] Adopting electric school buses in the United States: Health and climate benefits
    Choma, Ernani F.
    Robinson, Lisa A.
    Nadeau, Kari C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2024, 121 (22)
  • [28] Climate and health benefits of increasing renewable energy deployment in the United States
    Buonocore, Jonathan J.
    Hughes, Ethan J.
    Michanowicz, Drew R.
    Heo, Jinhyok
    Allen, Joseph G.
    Williams, Augusta
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 14 (11)
  • [29] Titans of the Climate: Explaining Policy Process in the United States and China
    Cooper, Richard N.
    FOREIGN AFFAIRS, 2019, 98 (05) : 225 - 226
  • [30] The role of science in policy: The climate change debate in the United States
    Skolnikoff, EB
    ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 41 (05): : 16 - +