Forest Management for Mitigation of CO2 Emissions: How Much Mitigation and Who Gets the Credits?

被引:0
|
作者
G. Marland
B. Schlamadinger
L. Canella
机构
[1] Oak Ridge National Laboratory,
[2] Joanneum Research,undefined
关键词
Forestry; carbon balance; wood products; energy substitution; materials substitution;
D O I
10.1023/B:MITI.0000004484.37564.d5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Forestry projects can mitigate the net flux of carbon (C) to the atmosphere in four ways: (1) C is stored in forest biomass — trees, litter and soil, (2) C is stored in durable wood product, (3) biomass fuels displace consumption of fossil fuels, and (4) wood products often require less fossil-fuel energy for their production and use than do alternate products that provide the same service. We use a mathematical model of C stocks and flows (GORCAM) to illustrate the inter-relationships among these impacts on the C cycle and the changing C balance over time. The model suggests that sustainable management for the harvest of forest products will yield more net C offset than will forest protection when forest productivity is high, forest products are produced and used efficiently, and longer time periods are considered. Yet it is very difficult to attribute all of the C offsets to the forestry projects. It is, at least in concept, straightforward to measure, verify, and attribute the C stored in the forests and in wood products. It is more challenging to measure the amount of fossil fuel saved directly because of the use of biomass fuels and to give proper attribution to a mitigation project. The amount of fossil fuel saved indirectly because biomass provides materials and services that are used in place of other materials and services may be very difficult to estimate and impossible to allocate to any project. Nonetheless, over the long run, these two aspects of fossil fuel saved may be the largest impacts of forestry projects on the global C cycle.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 318
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CO2 Mitigation by Agriculture: An Overview
    Keith Paustian
    C. Vernon Cole
    Dieter Sauerbeck
    Neil Sampson
    Climatic Change, 1998, 40 : 135 - 162
  • [42] Who gets how much of what: A description of intensive case management
    Durbin, J
    Goering, P
    Wasylenki, D
    Roth, J
    PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION JOURNAL, 1997, 20 (03): : 49 - 56
  • [43] The current situation on CO2 emissions from the steel industry in Thailand and mitigation options
    Sodsai, Promtida
    Rachdawong, Pichaya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2012, 6 : 48 - 55
  • [44] Potential and cost of CO2 emissions mitigation by using solar photovoltaic pumps in India
    Kumar, Atul
    Kandpal, Tara C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2007, 26 (03) : 159 - 166
  • [45] CO2 emissions in calcium carbide industry: An analysis of China's mitigation potential
    Liu, Xiaoyu
    Zhu, Bing
    Zhou, Wenji
    Hu, Shanying
    Chen, Dingjiang
    Griffy-Brown, Charla
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2011, 5 (05) : 1240 - 1249
  • [46] Impact of maritime emissions trading system on fleet deployment and mitigation of CO2 emission
    Zhu, Mo
    Yuen, Kum Fai
    Ge, Jia Wei
    Li, Kevin X.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 62 : 474 - 488
  • [47] Assessing China's Scope 2 CO2 emissions and mitigation pace from space
    Pan, Guanna
    Xu, Yuan
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 309
  • [48] National corridors for climate change mitigation: managing industrial CO2 emissions in France
    Bielicki, Jeffrey M.
    Calas, Guillaume
    Middleton, Richard S.
    Minh Ha-Duong
    GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 4 (03): : 262 - 277
  • [49] Decomposition of the US CO2 emissions and its mitigation potential: An aggregate and sectoral analysis
    Wang, Zhaojing
    Jiang, Qingzhe
    Dong, Kangyin
    Mubarik, Muhammad Shujaat
    Dong, Xiucheng
    ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 147
  • [50] Calculation of CO2 net sinks emissions in Russian forests and assessment of mitigation options
    Kokorin, AO
    Lelyakin, AL
    Nazarov, IM
    Fillipchuk, AN
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1996, 20 : S101 - S109