Forest Management for Mitigation of CO2 Emissions: How Much Mitigation and Who Gets the Credits?

被引:0
|
作者
G. Marland
B. Schlamadinger
L. Canella
机构
[1] Oak Ridge National Laboratory,
[2] Joanneum Research,undefined
关键词
Forestry; carbon balance; wood products; energy substitution; materials substitution;
D O I
10.1023/B:MITI.0000004484.37564.d5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Forestry projects can mitigate the net flux of carbon (C) to the atmosphere in four ways: (1) C is stored in forest biomass — trees, litter and soil, (2) C is stored in durable wood product, (3) biomass fuels displace consumption of fossil fuels, and (4) wood products often require less fossil-fuel energy for their production and use than do alternate products that provide the same service. We use a mathematical model of C stocks and flows (GORCAM) to illustrate the inter-relationships among these impacts on the C cycle and the changing C balance over time. The model suggests that sustainable management for the harvest of forest products will yield more net C offset than will forest protection when forest productivity is high, forest products are produced and used efficiently, and longer time periods are considered. Yet it is very difficult to attribute all of the C offsets to the forestry projects. It is, at least in concept, straightforward to measure, verify, and attribute the C stored in the forests and in wood products. It is more challenging to measure the amount of fossil fuel saved directly because of the use of biomass fuels and to give proper attribution to a mitigation project. The amount of fossil fuel saved indirectly because biomass provides materials and services that are used in place of other materials and services may be very difficult to estimate and impossible to allocate to any project. Nonetheless, over the long run, these two aspects of fossil fuel saved may be the largest impacts of forestry projects on the global C cycle.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 318
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An Evaluation Method of CO2 Emissions Reduction in Urban Traffic Congestion Mitigation
    Li Z.-Y.
    Liao K.
    Cui Z.-W.
    Liu Y.
    Jiaotong Yunshu Xitong Gongcheng Yu Xinxi/Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2020, 20 (02): : 8 - 12and19
  • [32] CO2 emissions mitigation potential of some renewable energy technologies in India
    Kumar, A.
    Kandpal, T. C.
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2007, 29 (13) : 1203 - 1214
  • [33] COST ESTIMATES FOR MITIGATION OF CO2 EMISSIONS OF TRANSPORTATION OF PARAIBA THROUGH REFORESTATION
    Bezerra Lima, Ana Carla
    Leite, Valderi Duarte
    Lima, Carlos Roberto
    NATIVA, 2015, 3 (04): : 258 - 262
  • [34] CO2 emissions mitigation from power generation using capture technologies
    Mathieu, Philippe
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES: OPTIONS AND PROSPECTS, 2008, : 195 - 205
  • [35] Analyzing CO2 emissions mitigation by technology improvement in Central and Eastern Europe
    Diana Ürge-Vorsatz
    Adam Szeszler
    GeoJournal, 2002, 57 (3) : 211 - 226
  • [36] Biological fossil CO2 mitigation
    Hughes, E
    Benemann, JR
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 38 : S467 - S473
  • [37] Methanol as an agent for CO2 mitigation
    Steinberg, M
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 38 : S423 - S430
  • [38] Scope of studies on CO2 mitigation
    Yamada, K
    ADVANCES IN CHEMICAL CONVERSIONS FOR MITIGATING CARBON DIOXIDE, 1998, 114 : 77 - 86
  • [39] CO2 mitigation with microalgae systems
    Benemann, JR
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 38 : S475 - S479
  • [40] CO2 mitigation by agriculture:: An overview
    Paustian, K
    Cole, CV
    Sauerbeck, D
    Sampson, N
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 1998, 40 (01) : 135 - 162