Forest Management for Mitigation of CO2 Emissions: How Much Mitigation and Who Gets the Credits?

被引:0
|
作者
G. Marland
B. Schlamadinger
L. Canella
机构
[1] Oak Ridge National Laboratory,
[2] Joanneum Research,undefined
关键词
Forestry; carbon balance; wood products; energy substitution; materials substitution;
D O I
10.1023/B:MITI.0000004484.37564.d5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Forestry projects can mitigate the net flux of carbon (C) to the atmosphere in four ways: (1) C is stored in forest biomass — trees, litter and soil, (2) C is stored in durable wood product, (3) biomass fuels displace consumption of fossil fuels, and (4) wood products often require less fossil-fuel energy for their production and use than do alternate products that provide the same service. We use a mathematical model of C stocks and flows (GORCAM) to illustrate the inter-relationships among these impacts on the C cycle and the changing C balance over time. The model suggests that sustainable management for the harvest of forest products will yield more net C offset than will forest protection when forest productivity is high, forest products are produced and used efficiently, and longer time periods are considered. Yet it is very difficult to attribute all of the C offsets to the forestry projects. It is, at least in concept, straightforward to measure, verify, and attribute the C stored in the forests and in wood products. It is more challenging to measure the amount of fossil fuel saved directly because of the use of biomass fuels and to give proper attribution to a mitigation project. The amount of fossil fuel saved indirectly because biomass provides materials and services that are used in place of other materials and services may be very difficult to estimate and impossible to allocate to any project. Nonetheless, over the long run, these two aspects of fossil fuel saved may be the largest impacts of forestry projects on the global C cycle.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 318
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Forest management for mitigation of CO2 emissions: How much mitigation and who gets the credits?
    Marland G.
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 1997, 2 (2-3) : 303 - 318
  • [2] Electrification of the economy and CO2 emissions mitigation
    Edmonds J.
    Wilson T.
    Wise M.
    Weyant J.
    Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2006, 7 (3) : 175 - 203
  • [3] Pledges for climate mitigation: the effects of the Copenhagen accord on CO2 emissions and mitigation costs
    Solveig Glomsrød
    Taoyuan Wei
    Knut H. Alfsen
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2013, 18 : 619 - 636
  • [4] Pledges for climate mitigation: the effects of the Copenhagen accord on CO2 emissions and mitigation costs
    Glomsrod, Solveig
    Wei, Taoyuan
    Alfsen, Knut H.
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2013, 18 (05) : 619 - 636
  • [5] Forest Fires in Mediterranean Countries: CO2 Emissions and Mitigation Possibilities Through Prescribed Burning
    Vilen, Terhi
    Fernandes, Paulo M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 48 (03) : 558 - 567
  • [6] Forest Fires in Mediterranean Countries: CO2 Emissions and Mitigation Possibilities Through Prescribed Burning
    Terhi Vilén
    Paulo M. Fernandes
    Environmental Management, 2011, 48 : 558 - 567
  • [7] Mitigation of CO2 emissions by optimizing energy storage capacity
    Chudy, Michal
    Mwaura, Jonathan
    2016 IEEE PES POWERAFRICA CONFERENCE, 2016, : 296 - 300
  • [8] CO2 emissions and mitigation potential of the Chinese manufacturing industry
    Yan, Xiao
    Fang, Yi-ping
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 103 : 759 - 773
  • [9] Mitigation of CO2 emissions from large industrial sources
    Wichterlova, J.
    Roubicek, V.
    Panek, P.
    CHEMICKE LISTY, 2008, 102 (07): : 500 - 505
  • [10] Electrochemical carbon capture processes for mitigation of CO2 emissions
    Rahimi, Mohammad
    Khurram, Aliza
    Hatton, T. Alan
    Gallant, Betar
    CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS, 2022, 51 (20) : 8676 - 8695