Environmental performance of phytosanitary control techniques on soybean crop estimated by life cycle assessment (LCA)

被引:0
|
作者
Kássio Ricardo Garcia Lucas
Maurício Ursi Ventura
Robson Rolland Monticelli Barizon
Marília Ieda da Silveira Folegatti-Matsuura
Ricardo Ralisch
Paulo Roberto Mrtvi
Edivan José Possamai
机构
[1] Universidade Estadual de Londrina,
[2] Embrapa Meio Ambiente,undefined
[3] Instituto de Desenvolvimento Rural do Paraná – Iapar-Emater (IDR-Paraná),undefined
关键词
Agricultural; Phytosanitary management; Integrated management; Transgenic cultivar; Modeling pesticides; PestLCI Consensus;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Phytosanitary control is essential to ensure agricultural productivity and quality. However, approaches based on scheduled use of pesticides, overuse of harmful molecules produce impacts on different types of living organisms. Integrated Pest and Disease Management (IPM-IDM) may significantly reduce the burden of pesticides in the environment. Plant resistance may also be included in the IPM-IDM and even in conventional management due to little requirement of additional knowledge and changes in agricultural practices. Robust environmental assessments using methodology of universal use, life cycle assessment (LCA), may estimate the impacts of specific pesticides that cause major damages, including remarkable category impacts. Therefore the objective of this study was to determine the impacts and (eco)toxicological effects of phytosanitary strategies (IPM-IDM including or not lepidopteran resistant transgenic cultivars) vs. the scheduled approach. Two inventory modeling methods were also applied to gather information on the use and applicability of these methods. Life cycle assessment (LCA) was applied using two inventory modeling methods: 100%Soil and PestLCI (Consensus) using data from Brazilian croplands under tropical conditions, by combining phytosanitary approaches (IPM-IDM, IPM-IDM + transgenic cultivar, conventional, conventional + transgenic cultivar) and modeling methods. Hence, eight soybean production scenarios were established. The IPM-IDM was efficient to reduce the (eco)toxicity impacts of soybean production mainly for freshwater ecotoxicity category. Due to the dynamic character of IPM-IDM approaches, the inclusion of recently introduced strategies (plant resistant and biological control to stink bugs and plant fungal diseases) may diminish even more the principal impacting substances throughout the Brazilian croplands. The PestLCI Consensus method, although its development is yet in progress, to date can be suggested to estimate the agriculture environmental impacts more properly under tropical conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:58315 / 58329
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The source of performance and excretion data affects the environmental impact of pig rearing estimated by life cycle assessment
    Monteiro, A. N. T. R.
    Dourmad, J-Y
    Moreira, C. A.
    Rossi, R. M.
    Ferreira, L. F. M.
    Costa, A. E. R.
    Pozza, P. C.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 100 (01) : 184 - 192
  • [42] Land use change (LUC) analysis and life cycle assessment (LCA) of Brazilian soybean biodiesel
    Pecanha Esteves, Victor Paulo
    Mano Esteves, Elisa Maria
    Bungenstab, Davi Jose
    dos Santos Wendriner Loebmann, Daniel Gomes
    Victoria, Daniel de Castro
    Vicente, Luiz Eduardo
    Fernandes Araujo, Ofelia de Queiroz
    Vaz Morgado, Claudia do Rosario
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2016, 18 (06) : 1655 - 1673
  • [43] Dairy Buffalo Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Affected by a Management Choice: The Production of Wheat Crop
    Romano, Elio
    De Palo, Pasquale
    Tidona, Flavio
    Maggiolino, Aristide
    Bragaglio, Andrea
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (19)
  • [44] Land use change (LUC) analysis and life cycle assessment (LCA) of Brazilian soybean biodiesel
    Victor Paulo Peçanha Esteves
    Elisa Maria Mano Esteves
    Davi José Bungenstab
    Daniel Gomes dos Santos Wendriner Loebmann
    Daniel de Castro Victoria
    Luiz Eduardo Vicente
    Ofélia de Queiroz Fernandes Araújo
    Cláudia do Rosário Vaz Morgado
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2016, 18 : 1655 - 1673
  • [45] Life cycle assessment (LCA) of two rearing techniques of sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax)
    Jerbi, M. A.
    Aubin, J.
    Garnaoui, K.
    Achour, L.
    Kacem, A.
    AQUACULTURAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 46 : 1 - 9
  • [46] Status of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in Africa
    Karkour, Selim
    Rachid, Safa
    Maaoui, Mariem
    Lin, Chia-Chun
    Itsubo, Norihiro
    ENVIRONMENTS, 2021, 8 (02) : 1 - 46
  • [47] Life cycle assessment (LCA) — quo vadis?
    Bradley A. Grimsted
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1997, 2 (1) : 32 - 32
  • [48] Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and degradable polymers
    Grant, Tim
    ACS Symposium Series, 2012, 1114 : 45 - 58
  • [49] Application of life cycle assessment (LCA) to analyze the environmental loads of heavy machinery components
    Siwiec, Dominika
    Pacana, Andrzej
    Mikeska, Martin
    ACTA MONTANISTICA SLOVACA, 2024, 29 (01) : 138 - 144
  • [50] Interaction of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and BIM in a Construction Project to Reduce the Environmental Footprint
    Osorio-Gomez, Cristian C.
    Alzate-Buitrago, Alejandro
    Amariles-Lopez, Cristhian C.
    Aristizabal-Torres, Daniel
    Mancilla-Rico, Edwin A.
    CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-TEHRAN, 2025, 11 (01): : 120 - 130