Environmental performance of phytosanitary control techniques on soybean crop estimated by life cycle assessment (LCA)

被引:0
|
作者
Kássio Ricardo Garcia Lucas
Maurício Ursi Ventura
Robson Rolland Monticelli Barizon
Marília Ieda da Silveira Folegatti-Matsuura
Ricardo Ralisch
Paulo Roberto Mrtvi
Edivan José Possamai
机构
[1] Universidade Estadual de Londrina,
[2] Embrapa Meio Ambiente,undefined
[3] Instituto de Desenvolvimento Rural do Paraná – Iapar-Emater (IDR-Paraná),undefined
关键词
Agricultural; Phytosanitary management; Integrated management; Transgenic cultivar; Modeling pesticides; PestLCI Consensus;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Phytosanitary control is essential to ensure agricultural productivity and quality. However, approaches based on scheduled use of pesticides, overuse of harmful molecules produce impacts on different types of living organisms. Integrated Pest and Disease Management (IPM-IDM) may significantly reduce the burden of pesticides in the environment. Plant resistance may also be included in the IPM-IDM and even in conventional management due to little requirement of additional knowledge and changes in agricultural practices. Robust environmental assessments using methodology of universal use, life cycle assessment (LCA), may estimate the impacts of specific pesticides that cause major damages, including remarkable category impacts. Therefore the objective of this study was to determine the impacts and (eco)toxicological effects of phytosanitary strategies (IPM-IDM including or not lepidopteran resistant transgenic cultivars) vs. the scheduled approach. Two inventory modeling methods were also applied to gather information on the use and applicability of these methods. Life cycle assessment (LCA) was applied using two inventory modeling methods: 100%Soil and PestLCI (Consensus) using data from Brazilian croplands under tropical conditions, by combining phytosanitary approaches (IPM-IDM, IPM-IDM + transgenic cultivar, conventional, conventional + transgenic cultivar) and modeling methods. Hence, eight soybean production scenarios were established. The IPM-IDM was efficient to reduce the (eco)toxicity impacts of soybean production mainly for freshwater ecotoxicity category. Due to the dynamic character of IPM-IDM approaches, the inclusion of recently introduced strategies (plant resistant and biological control to stink bugs and plant fungal diseases) may diminish even more the principal impacting substances throughout the Brazilian croplands. The PestLCI Consensus method, although its development is yet in progress, to date can be suggested to estimate the agriculture environmental impacts more properly under tropical conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:58315 / 58329
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Performance of phytosanitary products for control of soybean caterpillar
    Borges, Fabio S. P.
    Loureiro, Elisangela S.
    Jaurretche, Juan Esteban
    Pessoa, Luis Gustavo A.
    Arruda, Lucas A.
    Dias, Pamella M.
    Navarrete, Acacio A.
    ANAIS DA ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS, 2021, 93 (04):
  • [22] Concentrating solar systems: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and environmental issues
    Lamnatou, Chr
    Chemisana, D.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 78 : 916 - 932
  • [23] Environmental Performance of Alternative Hospital Waste Management Strategies Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Approach
    Mushtaq, Muhammad Hammad
    Noor, Fahad
    Mujtaba, M. A.
    Asghar, Salman
    Yusuf, Abdulfatah Abdu
    Soudagar, Manzoore Elahi M.
    Hussain, Abrar
    Badran, Mohamed Fathy
    Shahapurkar, Kiran
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (22)
  • [24] Environmental performance comparison of bioplastics and petrochemical plastics: A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) methodological decisions
    Bishop, George
    Styles, David
    Lens, Piet N. L.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 168
  • [25] Sustainable utilization of crop residues for energy generation: A life cycle assessment (LCA) perspective
    Prasad, Shiv
    Singh, Anoop
    Korres, Nicholas E.
    Rathore, Dheeraj
    Sevda, Surajbhan
    Pant, Deepak
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 303
  • [26] 'Bottom-up' approach to the implementation of environmental life cycle assessment (LCA)
    Mitchell, P
    Hyde, R
    FIRST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ENVIRONMENTALLY CONSCIOUS DEGIGN AND INVERSE MANUFACTURING, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 509 - 514
  • [27] How to benefit from decision analysis in environmental life cycle assessment (LCA)
    Miettinen, P
    Hamalainen, RP
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1997, 102 (02) : 279 - 294
  • [28] Environmental impacts of dry anaerobic biorefineries in a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach
    Rossi, Elena
    Pasciucco, Francesco
    Iannelli, Renato
    Pecorini, Isabella
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 371
  • [29] Environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) of Swedish semi-hard cheese
    Berlin, J
    INTERNATIONAL DAIRY JOURNAL, 2002, 12 (11) : 939 - 953
  • [30] Environmental impacts of dry anaerobic biorefineries in a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach
    Rossi, Elena
    Pasciucco, Francesco
    Iannelli, Renato
    Pecorini, Isabella
    Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 371