Influence of MR damper response time on semiactive suspension control efficiency

被引:1
|
作者
Zbyněk Strecker
Ivan Mazůrek
Jakub Roupec
Milan Klapka
机构
[1] Brno University of Technology,
来源
Meccanica | 2015年 / 50卷
关键词
MR damper; Response time; Semiactive algorithm ; Modified Groundhook;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper tries to find the reasons of differences between results from semiactive suspension simulations and from real measurements. Simulations of semiactive algorithms which have already been published in many scientific papers have showned a great potential for improvement of the suspension quality. However, experiments with suspension controlled by semiactive algorithms which are supposed to improve grip did not bring any benefits. The reason of algorithm failure seems to be the response time of the damper used in the suspension. This paper compares the quality of suspension using three different semiactive algorithms (Skyhook, Groundhook, modified Groundhook) and passive settings for different damping levels. All the simulations were conducted for three different response times of MR damper: 1.5, 8 and 20 ms. Response time 20 ms is usual for commercial MR dampers control. Response time 8 ms corresponds to commercial MR dampers which are controlled by the newly developed PWM controller. Response time 1.5 ms corresponds to the fastest available MR devices. Simulations show a significant influence of the MR damper response time on the suspension quality if semiactive algorithms are used. The simulations are confirmed by measurements on a quarter car suspension controlled by modified Groundhook algorithm using MR damper with response time 8 and 20 ms.
引用
收藏
页码:1949 / 1959
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence of MR damper response time on semiactive suspension control efficiency
    Strecker, Zbynek
    Mazurek, Ivan
    Roupec, Jakub
    Klapka, Milan
    MECCANICA, 2015, 50 (08) : 1949 - 1959
  • [2] Modeling and Control of a Shear-Valve Mode MR Damper for Semiactive Vehicle Suspension
    Meng, Fanxu
    Zhou, Jin
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2019, 2019
  • [3] Adaptive Control of Semiactive Quarter Car Model with MR Damper
    Yildiz, Ali S.
    Sivrioglu, S.
    Zergeroglu, E.
    Cetin, S.
    2013 9TH ASIAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ASCC), 2013,
  • [4] Semiactive vibration control of a smart seat with an MR fluid damper considering its time delay
    Park, CH
    Jeon, DY
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MATERIAL SYSTEMS AND STRUCTURES, 2002, 13 (7-8) : 521 - 524
  • [5] Resetting semiactive stiffness damper for seismic response control
    Yang, JN
    Kim, JH
    Agrawal, AK
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2000, 126 (12): : 1427 - 1433
  • [6] Semiactive Control of Structural Nonlinear Vibration Considering the MR Damper Model
    Li, Luyu
    Liang, Haizhi
    JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2018, 31 (06)
  • [7] FORCE CONTROL OF A SEMIACTIVE DAMPER
    BESINGER, FH
    CEBON, D
    COLE, DJ
    VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 1995, 24 (09) : 695 - 723
  • [8] Real-time hybrid testing of semiactive control strategies for vibration reduction in a structure with MR damper
    Zapateiro, M.
    Karimi, H. R.
    Luo, N.
    Spencer, B. F., Jr.
    STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2010, 17 (04): : 427 - 451
  • [9] Response Time of MR Suspension System and Control Compensation
    Yu, Miao
    Li, L. X.
    Dong, X. M.
    Li, Zushu
    2008 CONFERENCE ON HUMAN SYSTEM INTERACTIONS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 803 - +
  • [10] An Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Hybrid Control Strategy for a Semiactive Suspension with Magneto Rheological Damper
    Pipit Wahyu Nugroho
    Li, Weihua
    Du, Haiping
    Alici, Gursel
    Yang, Jian
    ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2014,