Influence of MR damper response time on semiactive suspension control efficiency

被引:1
|
作者
Zbyněk Strecker
Ivan Mazůrek
Jakub Roupec
Milan Klapka
机构
[1] Brno University of Technology,
来源
Meccanica | 2015年 / 50卷
关键词
MR damper; Response time; Semiactive algorithm ; Modified Groundhook;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper tries to find the reasons of differences between results from semiactive suspension simulations and from real measurements. Simulations of semiactive algorithms which have already been published in many scientific papers have showned a great potential for improvement of the suspension quality. However, experiments with suspension controlled by semiactive algorithms which are supposed to improve grip did not bring any benefits. The reason of algorithm failure seems to be the response time of the damper used in the suspension. This paper compares the quality of suspension using three different semiactive algorithms (Skyhook, Groundhook, modified Groundhook) and passive settings for different damping levels. All the simulations were conducted for three different response times of MR damper: 1.5, 8 and 20 ms. Response time 20 ms is usual for commercial MR dampers control. Response time 8 ms corresponds to commercial MR dampers which are controlled by the newly developed PWM controller. Response time 1.5 ms corresponds to the fastest available MR devices. Simulations show a significant influence of the MR damper response time on the suspension quality if semiactive algorithms are used. The simulations are confirmed by measurements on a quarter car suspension controlled by modified Groundhook algorithm using MR damper with response time 8 and 20 ms.
引用
收藏
页码:1949 / 1959
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Semiactive control for a distributed mass damper system
    Fu, Tat S.
    Johnson, Erik A.
    STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2017, 24 (04):
  • [22] Semiactive control of a secondary train suspension
    Codeca, Fabio
    Savaresi, Sergio M.
    Spelta, Cristiano
    Montiglio, Mauro
    Ieluzzi, Michele
    2007 IEEE/ASME INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED INTELLIGENT MECHATRONICS, VOLS 1-3, 2007, : 655 - +
  • [23] Structural Control Using a Semiactive Friction Damper
    Mantilla, Juan S.
    Gomez, Daniel
    Thomson, Peter
    SPECIAL TOPICS IN STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, VOL 6, 34TH IMAC, 2016, : 175 - 183
  • [24] The Application of MR Dampers in the Field of Semiactive Vehicle Suspension
    Strecker, Z.
    Ruzicka, B.
    MECHATRONICS: RECENT TECHNOLOGICAL AND SCIENTIFIC ADVANCES, 2011, : 149 - 154
  • [25] Semiactive Self-Tuning Fuzzy Logic Control of Full Vehicle Model with MR Damper
    Paksoy, Mahmut
    Guclu, Rahmi
    Cetin, Saban
    ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2014,
  • [26] Application of MR dampers for semiactive suspension of railway vehicles
    Wang, DH
    Liao, WH
    ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, VOLS I & II, 2000, 10 : 1389 - 1396
  • [27] Sensitivity Control of a MR-Damper Semi-Active Suspension
    Turnip, Arjon
    Park, Seonghun
    Hong, Keum-Shik
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRECISION ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING, 2010, 11 (02) : 209 - 218
  • [28] Sensitivity control of a MR-damper semi-active suspension
    Arjon Turnip
    Seonghun Park
    Keum-Shik Hong
    International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 2010, 11 : 209 - 218
  • [29] Semiactive fuzzy control of the seismic response of building frames with MR dampers
    Das, Diptesh
    Datta, T. K.
    Madan, Alok
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2012, 41 (01): : 99 - 118
  • [30] Semi-active H∞ control of seat suspension with MR damper
    Yao, H. J.
    Fu, J.
    Yu, M.
    Peng, Y. X.
    13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRORHEOLOGICAL FLUIDS AND MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL SUSPENSIONS (ERMR2012), 2013, 412